Cargando…

Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We compared the outcome of robotic hysterectomy (RH) with laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) for large uteri (≥16 weeks). METHODS: This was a retrospective review over 5 years of 165 women (RH, 46; LH, 119). Demographic data, conversion, hemoglobin drop, indication, operating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinha, Rooma, Bana, Rupa, Sanjay, Madhumathi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675091
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00068
_version_ 1783386633735766016
author Sinha, Rooma
Bana, Rupa
Sanjay, Madhumathi
author_facet Sinha, Rooma
Bana, Rupa
Sanjay, Madhumathi
author_sort Sinha, Rooma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We compared the outcome of robotic hysterectomy (RH) with laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) for large uteri (≥16 weeks). METHODS: This was a retrospective review over 5 years of 165 women (RH, 46; LH, 119). Demographic data, conversion, hemoglobin drop, indication, operating time, postoperative stay, and intra-operative strategies (adhesiolysis, myomectomy) were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age was 45.7 ± 6.4 years and 44.5 ± 5.4 years (no diff) and body mass index was 30.2 ± 6.3 kg/m(2) and 27.8 ± 4.8 kg/m(2) (P = .009) in the RH and LH groups. There was no difference in percentage of women with previous laparotomy (RH, 15.2% vs LH, 13.4%) and mean number of lower-segment caesarean section (RH, 1.0 vs LH, 0.8). Mean size of uterus was similar (RH, 20.0 weeks vs LH, 17.4 weeks). The mean number of ports was higher in the RH group (RH, 4.2 vs LH, 3.4; P < .001) as was needed for adhesiolysis (RH, 71.7% vs LH, 35.3%; P < .001). Difficult bladder dissection was more in the RH group (56.5% vs 26.1%; P < .001). Vaginal morcellation was similar in both groups (RH, 89.1%; LH, 83.2%). RH took longer operating time (131.0 vs 110.6 minutes; P = .006). RH had less drop in Hb (1.0 vs 1.8 g/dL; P < .001) and remained the same after multiple regression analysis. Postoperative stay was similar in both groups (1.4 days). Requirement of intravenous analgesia was significantly lower in the RH group (12.5 vs 30.9 hours; P < .001). Open conversion rate was 4.3% (RH) and 10.9% (LH) but not significant. CONCLUSION: A higher body mass index, more adhesiolysis, and difficult bladder dissection imply a more challenging nature of women who underwent RH. Despite this, RH was shown to be feasible and safe with a lower blood loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6328360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63283602019-01-23 Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus Sinha, Rooma Bana, Rupa Sanjay, Madhumathi JSLS Scientific Paper BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We compared the outcome of robotic hysterectomy (RH) with laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) for large uteri (≥16 weeks). METHODS: This was a retrospective review over 5 years of 165 women (RH, 46; LH, 119). Demographic data, conversion, hemoglobin drop, indication, operating time, postoperative stay, and intra-operative strategies (adhesiolysis, myomectomy) were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age was 45.7 ± 6.4 years and 44.5 ± 5.4 years (no diff) and body mass index was 30.2 ± 6.3 kg/m(2) and 27.8 ± 4.8 kg/m(2) (P = .009) in the RH and LH groups. There was no difference in percentage of women with previous laparotomy (RH, 15.2% vs LH, 13.4%) and mean number of lower-segment caesarean section (RH, 1.0 vs LH, 0.8). Mean size of uterus was similar (RH, 20.0 weeks vs LH, 17.4 weeks). The mean number of ports was higher in the RH group (RH, 4.2 vs LH, 3.4; P < .001) as was needed for adhesiolysis (RH, 71.7% vs LH, 35.3%; P < .001). Difficult bladder dissection was more in the RH group (56.5% vs 26.1%; P < .001). Vaginal morcellation was similar in both groups (RH, 89.1%; LH, 83.2%). RH took longer operating time (131.0 vs 110.6 minutes; P = .006). RH had less drop in Hb (1.0 vs 1.8 g/dL; P < .001) and remained the same after multiple regression analysis. Postoperative stay was similar in both groups (1.4 days). Requirement of intravenous analgesia was significantly lower in the RH group (12.5 vs 30.9 hours; P < .001). Open conversion rate was 4.3% (RH) and 10.9% (LH) but not significant. CONCLUSION: A higher body mass index, more adhesiolysis, and difficult bladder dissection imply a more challenging nature of women who underwent RH. Despite this, RH was shown to be feasible and safe with a lower blood loss. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6328360/ /pubmed/30675091 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00068 Text en © 2019 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Paper
Sinha, Rooma
Bana, Rupa
Sanjay, Madhumathi
Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus
title Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus
title_full Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus
title_fullStr Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus
title_short Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus
title_sort comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for the large uterus
topic Scientific Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675091
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00068
work_keys_str_mv AT sinharooma comparisonofroboticandlaparoscopichysterectomyforthelargeuterus
AT banarupa comparisonofroboticandlaparoscopichysterectomyforthelargeuterus
AT sanjaymadhumathi comparisonofroboticandlaparoscopichysterectomyforthelargeuterus