Cargando…

Robotic Repair of Supratrigonal Vesicovaginal Fistula with Sigmoid Epiploica Interposition

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: In the United States, vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) most often results from gynecologic surgery causing significant morbidity and distress to both the patient and surgeon. The use of tissue interposition at time of primary repair has been advocated to decrease the risk of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanderson, Derrick J., Rutkowski, John, Attuwaybi, Bashir, Eddib, Abeer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662253
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00055
_version_ 1783386634659561472
author Sanderson, Derrick J.
Rutkowski, John
Attuwaybi, Bashir
Eddib, Abeer
author_facet Sanderson, Derrick J.
Rutkowski, John
Attuwaybi, Bashir
Eddib, Abeer
author_sort Sanderson, Derrick J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: In the United States, vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) most often results from gynecologic surgery causing significant morbidity and distress to both the patient and surgeon. The use of tissue interposition at time of primary repair has been advocated to decrease the risk of recurrence. The aim of this study is to describe our experience with interposition of sigmoid epiploica during robotic extravesical repair of supratrigonal VVF. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series from June 2015 to September 2016. Features of the surgical technique include 1) cystoscopic ureteral catheterization, 2) cannulation of the fistula, 3) mobilization of the bladder from the vagina, 4) removal of the epithelialized edges of the fistulous tract, 5) single-layer closure of the vagina, 6) tension-free layered closure of the bladder, 7) retrograde fill of the bladder to ensure water-tight repair, 8) interposition of sigmoid epiploica appendage(s), and 9) prolonged bladder drainage with indwelling transurethral catheter. RESULTS: In total, 5 women underwent successful robotic VVF repair with epiploic appendage interposition. Mean surgical time was 218 minutes with an average console time of 147 minutes and an estimated blood loss of 49 mL. Most the patients were discharged to home on postoperative day 1 with no untoward effects due to the epiploica interposition. There have been no recurrences to date. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic repair of VVF with sigmoid epiploica interposition is efficient and well tolerated. Use of this technique may increase the number of patients eligible for tissue interposition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6328364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63283642019-01-18 Robotic Repair of Supratrigonal Vesicovaginal Fistula with Sigmoid Epiploica Interposition Sanderson, Derrick J. Rutkowski, John Attuwaybi, Bashir Eddib, Abeer JSLS Case Series INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: In the United States, vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) most often results from gynecologic surgery causing significant morbidity and distress to both the patient and surgeon. The use of tissue interposition at time of primary repair has been advocated to decrease the risk of recurrence. The aim of this study is to describe our experience with interposition of sigmoid epiploica during robotic extravesical repair of supratrigonal VVF. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series from June 2015 to September 2016. Features of the surgical technique include 1) cystoscopic ureteral catheterization, 2) cannulation of the fistula, 3) mobilization of the bladder from the vagina, 4) removal of the epithelialized edges of the fistulous tract, 5) single-layer closure of the vagina, 6) tension-free layered closure of the bladder, 7) retrograde fill of the bladder to ensure water-tight repair, 8) interposition of sigmoid epiploica appendage(s), and 9) prolonged bladder drainage with indwelling transurethral catheter. RESULTS: In total, 5 women underwent successful robotic VVF repair with epiploic appendage interposition. Mean surgical time was 218 minutes with an average console time of 147 minutes and an estimated blood loss of 49 mL. Most the patients were discharged to home on postoperative day 1 with no untoward effects due to the epiploica interposition. There have been no recurrences to date. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic repair of VVF with sigmoid epiploica interposition is efficient and well tolerated. Use of this technique may increase the number of patients eligible for tissue interposition. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6328364/ /pubmed/30662253 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00055 Text en © 2018 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Case Series
Sanderson, Derrick J.
Rutkowski, John
Attuwaybi, Bashir
Eddib, Abeer
Robotic Repair of Supratrigonal Vesicovaginal Fistula with Sigmoid Epiploica Interposition
title Robotic Repair of Supratrigonal Vesicovaginal Fistula with Sigmoid Epiploica Interposition
title_full Robotic Repair of Supratrigonal Vesicovaginal Fistula with Sigmoid Epiploica Interposition
title_fullStr Robotic Repair of Supratrigonal Vesicovaginal Fistula with Sigmoid Epiploica Interposition
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Repair of Supratrigonal Vesicovaginal Fistula with Sigmoid Epiploica Interposition
title_short Robotic Repair of Supratrigonal Vesicovaginal Fistula with Sigmoid Epiploica Interposition
title_sort robotic repair of supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula with sigmoid epiploica interposition
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662253
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00055
work_keys_str_mv AT sandersonderrickj roboticrepairofsupratrigonalvesicovaginalfistulawithsigmoidepiploicainterposition
AT rutkowskijohn roboticrepairofsupratrigonalvesicovaginalfistulawithsigmoidepiploicainterposition
AT attuwaybibashir roboticrepairofsupratrigonalvesicovaginalfistulawithsigmoidepiploicainterposition
AT eddibabeer roboticrepairofsupratrigonalvesicovaginalfistulawithsigmoidepiploicainterposition