Cargando…
A randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate local heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: the preHEAT trial
OBJECTIVE: preHEAT was a randomised controlled feasibility trial to determine how best to measure skin necrosis in breast reconstruction to inform the design of a larger multicentre trial. BACKGROUND: Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) is a serious complication resulting in prolonged wound healing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0392-y |
_version_ | 1783386782242439168 |
---|---|
author | Mehta, Saahil Cro, Suzie Cro Coomber, Billie Rolph, Rachel Cornelius, Victoria Farhadi, Jian |
author_facet | Mehta, Saahil Cro, Suzie Cro Coomber, Billie Rolph, Rachel Cornelius, Victoria Farhadi, Jian |
author_sort | Mehta, Saahil |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: preHEAT was a randomised controlled feasibility trial to determine how best to measure skin necrosis in breast reconstruction to inform the design of a larger multicentre trial. BACKGROUND: Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) is a serious complication resulting in prolonged wound healing. Local heat preconditioning of the MSF before surgery has been shown to reduce skin necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction patients (IBR). METHOD: preHEAT was a single-centre, randomised control two-arm single-blind parallel arm feasibility trial of local heat preconditioning in breast cancer patients undergoing SSM and NSM at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK. All patients undergoing IBR above the age of 18 were included. Intervention patients heated breast skin to 43 °C in three, 30-min cycles interrupted by spontaneous cooling using hot water bottles. The primary aim was to compare measurement of skin necrosis using binary ‘yes/no’ assessment, the SKIN score, and wound area. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one patients were randomised over a 2-year period (71 heated group, 70 controls). There was near perfect agreement between assessors using the “yes/no” measurement of necrosis. The proportion of patients experiencing necrosis in controls was 35% (n = 23/66) in the heated 26% (n = 18/68]). In the control group, 17% (n = 4/23) patients experiencing necrosis required surgical intervention for necrosis compared to 11% (n = 2/18) in the heated group. CONCLUSION: The binary outcome of MSFN “yes/no” is a suitable and reliable primary outcome measure of necrosis and was superior to the SKIN Score or necrosis area. The trial study design is feasible for a larger definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN15744669. Date of registration: 25/02/2018 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-019-0392-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6329155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63291552019-01-17 A randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate local heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: the preHEAT trial Mehta, Saahil Cro, Suzie Cro Coomber, Billie Rolph, Rachel Cornelius, Victoria Farhadi, Jian Pilot Feasibility Stud Research OBJECTIVE: preHEAT was a randomised controlled feasibility trial to determine how best to measure skin necrosis in breast reconstruction to inform the design of a larger multicentre trial. BACKGROUND: Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) is a serious complication resulting in prolonged wound healing. Local heat preconditioning of the MSF before surgery has been shown to reduce skin necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction patients (IBR). METHOD: preHEAT was a single-centre, randomised control two-arm single-blind parallel arm feasibility trial of local heat preconditioning in breast cancer patients undergoing SSM and NSM at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK. All patients undergoing IBR above the age of 18 were included. Intervention patients heated breast skin to 43 °C in three, 30-min cycles interrupted by spontaneous cooling using hot water bottles. The primary aim was to compare measurement of skin necrosis using binary ‘yes/no’ assessment, the SKIN score, and wound area. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one patients were randomised over a 2-year period (71 heated group, 70 controls). There was near perfect agreement between assessors using the “yes/no” measurement of necrosis. The proportion of patients experiencing necrosis in controls was 35% (n = 23/66) in the heated 26% (n = 18/68]). In the control group, 17% (n = 4/23) patients experiencing necrosis required surgical intervention for necrosis compared to 11% (n = 2/18) in the heated group. CONCLUSION: The binary outcome of MSFN “yes/no” is a suitable and reliable primary outcome measure of necrosis and was superior to the SKIN Score or necrosis area. The trial study design is feasible for a larger definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN15744669. Date of registration: 25/02/2018 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-019-0392-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6329155/ /pubmed/30656059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0392-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Mehta, Saahil Cro, Suzie Cro Coomber, Billie Rolph, Rachel Cornelius, Victoria Farhadi, Jian A randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate local heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: the preHEAT trial |
title | A randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate local heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: the preHEAT trial |
title_full | A randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate local heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: the preHEAT trial |
title_fullStr | A randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate local heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: the preHEAT trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate local heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: the preHEAT trial |
title_short | A randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate local heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: the preHEAT trial |
title_sort | randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate local heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: the preheat trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0392-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehtasaahil arandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial AT crosuziecro arandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial AT coomberbillie arandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial AT rolphrachel arandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial AT corneliusvictoria arandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial AT farhadijian arandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial AT mehtasaahil randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial AT crosuziecro randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial AT coomberbillie randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial AT rolphrachel randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial AT corneliusvictoria randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial AT farhadijian randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialtoevaluatelocalheatpreconditioningonwoundhealingafterreconstructivebreastsurgerythepreheattrial |