Cargando…

Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are the third most common fracture in older patients. The purpose of the study was to prospectively evaluate the outcomes of PHF fixation with a locking blade nail (LBN) or locking plate (PHILOS) osteosynthesis in a homogeneous elderly patient population...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plath, Johannes E., Kerschbaum, Christian, Seebauer, Tobias, Holz, Rainer, Henderson, Daniel J. H., Förch, Stefan, Mayr, Edgar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30630465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2399-1
_version_ 1783386784389922816
author Plath, Johannes E.
Kerschbaum, Christian
Seebauer, Tobias
Holz, Rainer
Henderson, Daniel J. H.
Förch, Stefan
Mayr, Edgar
author_facet Plath, Johannes E.
Kerschbaum, Christian
Seebauer, Tobias
Holz, Rainer
Henderson, Daniel J. H.
Förch, Stefan
Mayr, Edgar
author_sort Plath, Johannes E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are the third most common fracture in older patients. The purpose of the study was to prospectively evaluate the outcomes of PHF fixation with a locking blade nail (LBN) or locking plate (PHILOS) osteosynthesis in a homogeneous elderly patient population. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were an age > 60 years and the capacity to give informed consent. Patients with isolated tuberosity fractures, previous trauma or surgery, advanced osteoarthritis, fracture dislocation, pathological fractures, open fractures, neurological disorders, full-thickness rotator cuff tears, fracture line at the nail entry point or severely reduced bone quality intra-operatively were excluded. Eighty one patients with PHFs were randomised to treatment using LBN or PHILOS. Outcome measures comprised Constant score, age and gender adjusted Constant score, DASH score, VAS for pain, subjective overall condition of the shoulder (1–6) and active shoulder range-of-motion in flexion and abduction. Plain radiographs were obtained in two planes. All data were collected by an independent observer at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were excluded intra-operatively due to rotator cuff tears, fracture morphology or poor bone-quality. Of the remaining 68 patients, 27 in the LBN and 28 in the PHILOS group completed the full follow-up. Mean age at surgery was 75.6 years and the majority of PHFs were three-part fractures (49 patients). Baseline demographics between groups were comparable. All outcome measures improved between assessments (p < 0.001). The LBN group showed improved DASH scores as compared to PHILOS at 12 months (p = 0.042) with fewer incidences of secondary loss of reduction and screw cut-out (p = 0.039). A total of 29 complications (in 23 patients) were recorded, 13 complications (in 12 patients) in the LBN group and 16 complications (in 11 patients) in the PHILOS group (p = 0.941). No significant inter-group difference was observed for any other outcome measures, nor was fracture morphology seen to be associated with clinical outcome or complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: At short-term follow-up, LBN osteosynthesis yielded similar outcomes and complication rates to PHILOS plate fracture fixation in an elderly patient population, though with a significantly lower rate of secondary loss of reduction and screw cut-out. REGISTRATION TRIAL: No. DRKS00015245 at Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, registered: 22.08.2018, retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6329164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63291642019-01-16 Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial Plath, Johannes E. Kerschbaum, Christian Seebauer, Tobias Holz, Rainer Henderson, Daniel J. H. Förch, Stefan Mayr, Edgar BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are the third most common fracture in older patients. The purpose of the study was to prospectively evaluate the outcomes of PHF fixation with a locking blade nail (LBN) or locking plate (PHILOS) osteosynthesis in a homogeneous elderly patient population. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were an age > 60 years and the capacity to give informed consent. Patients with isolated tuberosity fractures, previous trauma or surgery, advanced osteoarthritis, fracture dislocation, pathological fractures, open fractures, neurological disorders, full-thickness rotator cuff tears, fracture line at the nail entry point or severely reduced bone quality intra-operatively were excluded. Eighty one patients with PHFs were randomised to treatment using LBN or PHILOS. Outcome measures comprised Constant score, age and gender adjusted Constant score, DASH score, VAS for pain, subjective overall condition of the shoulder (1–6) and active shoulder range-of-motion in flexion and abduction. Plain radiographs were obtained in two planes. All data were collected by an independent observer at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were excluded intra-operatively due to rotator cuff tears, fracture morphology or poor bone-quality. Of the remaining 68 patients, 27 in the LBN and 28 in the PHILOS group completed the full follow-up. Mean age at surgery was 75.6 years and the majority of PHFs were three-part fractures (49 patients). Baseline demographics between groups were comparable. All outcome measures improved between assessments (p < 0.001). The LBN group showed improved DASH scores as compared to PHILOS at 12 months (p = 0.042) with fewer incidences of secondary loss of reduction and screw cut-out (p = 0.039). A total of 29 complications (in 23 patients) were recorded, 13 complications (in 12 patients) in the LBN group and 16 complications (in 11 patients) in the PHILOS group (p = 0.941). No significant inter-group difference was observed for any other outcome measures, nor was fracture morphology seen to be associated with clinical outcome or complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: At short-term follow-up, LBN osteosynthesis yielded similar outcomes and complication rates to PHILOS plate fracture fixation in an elderly patient population, though with a significantly lower rate of secondary loss of reduction and screw cut-out. REGISTRATION TRIAL: No. DRKS00015245 at Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, registered: 22.08.2018, retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2019-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6329164/ /pubmed/30630465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2399-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Plath, Johannes E.
Kerschbaum, Christian
Seebauer, Tobias
Holz, Rainer
Henderson, Daniel J. H.
Förch, Stefan
Mayr, Edgar
Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial
title Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_full Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_short Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial
title_sort locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30630465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2399-1
work_keys_str_mv AT plathjohannese lockingnailversuslockingplateforproximalhumeralfracturefixationinanelderlypopulationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kerschbaumchristian lockingnailversuslockingplateforproximalhumeralfracturefixationinanelderlypopulationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT seebauertobias lockingnailversuslockingplateforproximalhumeralfracturefixationinanelderlypopulationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT holzrainer lockingnailversuslockingplateforproximalhumeralfracturefixationinanelderlypopulationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hendersondanieljh lockingnailversuslockingplateforproximalhumeralfracturefixationinanelderlypopulationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT forchstefan lockingnailversuslockingplateforproximalhumeralfracturefixationinanelderlypopulationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mayredgar lockingnailversuslockingplateforproximalhumeralfracturefixationinanelderlypopulationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrial