Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries
BACKGROUND: Infraclavicular approach is a common technique of brachial plexus block. The main difficulty of ultrasound guided technique is in needle visualization due to deep location of the cords. Hebbard et al described a retroclavicular approach wherein the needle was inserted posteriorly to the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30692886 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_737_17 |
_version_ | 1783386800274800640 |
---|---|
author | Sinha, Chandni Kumar, Neeraj Kumar, Amarjeet Kumar, Ajeet Kumar, Anup |
author_facet | Sinha, Chandni Kumar, Neeraj Kumar, Amarjeet Kumar, Ajeet Kumar, Anup |
author_sort | Sinha, Chandni |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Infraclavicular approach is a common technique of brachial plexus block. The main difficulty of ultrasound guided technique is in needle visualization due to deep location of the cords. Hebbard et al described a retroclavicular approach wherein the needle was inserted posteriorly to the clavicle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, we have compared the classical technique with the retroclavicular approach in terms of needle visibility, block success rate, number of needle passes, block performance time, procedure-related pain, complications, patient and operator comfort and satisfaction. RESULTS: The rate of block success was similar in both the groups. The needle tip and shaft visibility was more in the retroclavicular group (P < 0.05). The number of needle passes was also less in the retroclavicular group. Time for the block procedure was less in retroclavicular group when compared to the classical coracoid group. The patients reported less pain in retroclavicular group (P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Retroclavicular approach is a feasible option of infraclavicular brachial plexus block in Indian Subpopulation in terms of needle visibility and block success rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6329239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63292392019-01-28 Comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries Sinha, Chandni Kumar, Neeraj Kumar, Amarjeet Kumar, Ajeet Kumar, Anup Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Infraclavicular approach is a common technique of brachial plexus block. The main difficulty of ultrasound guided technique is in needle visualization due to deep location of the cords. Hebbard et al described a retroclavicular approach wherein the needle was inserted posteriorly to the clavicle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, we have compared the classical technique with the retroclavicular approach in terms of needle visibility, block success rate, number of needle passes, block performance time, procedure-related pain, complications, patient and operator comfort and satisfaction. RESULTS: The rate of block success was similar in both the groups. The needle tip and shaft visibility was more in the retroclavicular group (P < 0.05). The number of needle passes was also less in the retroclavicular group. Time for the block procedure was less in retroclavicular group when compared to the classical coracoid group. The patients reported less pain in retroclavicular group (P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Retroclavicular approach is a feasible option of infraclavicular brachial plexus block in Indian Subpopulation in terms of needle visibility and block success rate. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6329239/ /pubmed/30692886 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_737_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Saudi Journal of Anesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sinha, Chandni Kumar, Neeraj Kumar, Amarjeet Kumar, Ajeet Kumar, Anup Comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries |
title | Comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of two approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper-limb surgeries |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30692886 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_737_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sinhachandni comparativeevaluationoftwoapproachesofinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblockforupperlimbsurgeries AT kumarneeraj comparativeevaluationoftwoapproachesofinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblockforupperlimbsurgeries AT kumaramarjeet comparativeevaluationoftwoapproachesofinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblockforupperlimbsurgeries AT kumarajeet comparativeevaluationoftwoapproachesofinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblockforupperlimbsurgeries AT kumaranup comparativeevaluationoftwoapproachesofinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblockforupperlimbsurgeries |