Cargando…
Digital recruitment and enrollment in a remote nationwide trial of screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: Lessons from the randomized, controlled mSToPS trial
OBJECTIVES: The advent of large databases, wearable technology, and novel communications methods has the potential to expand the pool of candidate research participants and offer them the flexibility and convenience of participating in remote research. However, reports of their effectiveness are spa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100318 |
_version_ | 1783386821542019072 |
---|---|
author | Baca-Motes, Katie Edwards, Alison M. Waalen, Jill Edmonds, Shawn Mehta, Rajesh R. Ariniello, Lauren Ebner, Gail S. Talantov, Dimitri Fastenau, John M. Carter, Chureen T. Sarich, Troy C. Felicione, Elise Topol, Eric J. Steinhubl, Steven R. |
author_facet | Baca-Motes, Katie Edwards, Alison M. Waalen, Jill Edmonds, Shawn Mehta, Rajesh R. Ariniello, Lauren Ebner, Gail S. Talantov, Dimitri Fastenau, John M. Carter, Chureen T. Sarich, Troy C. Felicione, Elise Topol, Eric J. Steinhubl, Steven R. |
author_sort | Baca-Motes, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The advent of large databases, wearable technology, and novel communications methods has the potential to expand the pool of candidate research participants and offer them the flexibility and convenience of participating in remote research. However, reports of their effectiveness are sparse. We assessed the use of various forms of outreach within a nationwide randomized clinical trial being conducted entirely by remote means. METHODS: Candidate participants at possibly higher risk for atrial fibrillation were identified by means of a large insurance claims database and invited to participate in the study by their insurance provider. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups testing a wearable sensor device for detection of the arrhythmia. RESULTS: Over 10 months, the various outreach methods used resulted in enrollment of 2659 participants meeting eligibility criteria. Starting with a baseline enrollment rate of 0.8% in response to an email invitation, the recruitment campaign was iteratively optimized to ultimately include website changes and the use of a five-step outreach process (three short, personalized emails and two direct mailers) that highlighted the appeal of new technology used in the study, resulting in an enrollment rate of 9.4%. Messaging that highlighted access to new technology outperformed both appeals to altruism and appeals that highlighted accessing personal health information. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted outreach, enrollment, and management of large remote clinical trials is feasible and can be improved with an iterative approach, although more work is needed to learn how to best recruit and retain potential research participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.govNCT02506244. Registered 23 July 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6329362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63293622019-01-17 Digital recruitment and enrollment in a remote nationwide trial of screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: Lessons from the randomized, controlled mSToPS trial Baca-Motes, Katie Edwards, Alison M. Waalen, Jill Edmonds, Shawn Mehta, Rajesh R. Ariniello, Lauren Ebner, Gail S. Talantov, Dimitri Fastenau, John M. Carter, Chureen T. Sarich, Troy C. Felicione, Elise Topol, Eric J. Steinhubl, Steven R. Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article OBJECTIVES: The advent of large databases, wearable technology, and novel communications methods has the potential to expand the pool of candidate research participants and offer them the flexibility and convenience of participating in remote research. However, reports of their effectiveness are sparse. We assessed the use of various forms of outreach within a nationwide randomized clinical trial being conducted entirely by remote means. METHODS: Candidate participants at possibly higher risk for atrial fibrillation were identified by means of a large insurance claims database and invited to participate in the study by their insurance provider. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups testing a wearable sensor device for detection of the arrhythmia. RESULTS: Over 10 months, the various outreach methods used resulted in enrollment of 2659 participants meeting eligibility criteria. Starting with a baseline enrollment rate of 0.8% in response to an email invitation, the recruitment campaign was iteratively optimized to ultimately include website changes and the use of a five-step outreach process (three short, personalized emails and two direct mailers) that highlighted the appeal of new technology used in the study, resulting in an enrollment rate of 9.4%. Messaging that highlighted access to new technology outperformed both appeals to altruism and appeals that highlighted accessing personal health information. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted outreach, enrollment, and management of large remote clinical trials is feasible and can be improved with an iterative approach, although more work is needed to learn how to best recruit and retain potential research participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.govNCT02506244. Registered 23 July 2015. Elsevier 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6329362/ /pubmed/30656241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100318 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Baca-Motes, Katie Edwards, Alison M. Waalen, Jill Edmonds, Shawn Mehta, Rajesh R. Ariniello, Lauren Ebner, Gail S. Talantov, Dimitri Fastenau, John M. Carter, Chureen T. Sarich, Troy C. Felicione, Elise Topol, Eric J. Steinhubl, Steven R. Digital recruitment and enrollment in a remote nationwide trial of screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: Lessons from the randomized, controlled mSToPS trial |
title | Digital recruitment and enrollment in a remote nationwide trial of screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: Lessons from the randomized, controlled mSToPS trial |
title_full | Digital recruitment and enrollment in a remote nationwide trial of screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: Lessons from the randomized, controlled mSToPS trial |
title_fullStr | Digital recruitment and enrollment in a remote nationwide trial of screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: Lessons from the randomized, controlled mSToPS trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital recruitment and enrollment in a remote nationwide trial of screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: Lessons from the randomized, controlled mSToPS trial |
title_short | Digital recruitment and enrollment in a remote nationwide trial of screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: Lessons from the randomized, controlled mSToPS trial |
title_sort | digital recruitment and enrollment in a remote nationwide trial of screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: lessons from the randomized, controlled mstops trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bacamoteskatie digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT edwardsalisonm digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT waalenjill digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT edmondsshawn digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT mehtarajeshr digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT ariniellolauren digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT ebnergails digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT talantovdimitri digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT fastenaujohnm digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT carterchureent digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT sarichtroyc digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT felicioneelise digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT topolericj digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial AT steinhublstevenr digitalrecruitmentandenrollmentinaremotenationwidetrialofscreeningforundiagnosedatrialfibrillationlessonsfromtherandomizedcontrolledmstopstrial |