Cargando…
Predicting responses to platin chemotherapy agents with biochemically-inspired machine learning
The selection of effective genes that accurately predict chemotherapy responses might improve cancer outcomes. We compare optimized gene signatures for cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin responses in the same cell lines and validate each signature using data from patients with cancer. Supervise...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30652029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41392-018-0034-5 |
_version_ | 1783386872050876416 |
---|---|
author | Mucaki, Eliseos J. Zhao, Jonathan Z. L. Lizotte, Daniel J. Rogan, Peter K. |
author_facet | Mucaki, Eliseos J. Zhao, Jonathan Z. L. Lizotte, Daniel J. Rogan, Peter K. |
author_sort | Mucaki, Eliseos J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The selection of effective genes that accurately predict chemotherapy responses might improve cancer outcomes. We compare optimized gene signatures for cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin responses in the same cell lines and validate each signature using data from patients with cancer. Supervised support vector machine learning is used to derive gene sets whose expression is related to the cell line GI(50) values by backwards feature selection with cross-validation. Specific genes and functional pathways distinguishing sensitive from resistant cell lines are identified by contrasting signatures obtained at extreme and median GI(50) thresholds. Ensembles of gene signatures at different thresholds are combined to reduce the dependence on specific GI(50) values for predicting drug responses. The most accurate gene signatures for each platin are: cisplatin: BARD1, BCL2, BCL2L1, CDKN2C, FAAP24, FEN1, MAP3K1, MAPK13, MAPK3, NFKB1, NFKB2, SLC22A5, SLC31A2, TLR4, and TWIST1; carboplatin: AKT1, EIF3K, ERCC1, GNGT1, GSR, MTHFR, NEDD4L, NLRP1, NRAS, RAF1, SGK1, TIGD1, TP53, VEGFB, and VEGFC; and oxaliplatin: BRAF, FCGR2A, IGF1, MSH2, NAGK, NFE2L2, NQO1, PANK3, SLC47A1, SLCO1B1, and UGT1A1. Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) patients with bladder, ovarian, and colorectal cancer were used to test the cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin signatures, resulting in 71.0%, 60.2%, and 54.5% accuracies in predicting disease recurrence and 59%, 61%, and 72% accuracies in predicting remission, respectively. One cisplatin signature predicted 100% of recurrence in non-smoking patients with bladder cancer (57% disease-free; N = 19), and 79% recurrence in smokers (62% disease-free; N = 35). This approach should be adaptable to other studies of chemotherapy responses, regardless of the drug or cancer types. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6329797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63297972019-01-16 Predicting responses to platin chemotherapy agents with biochemically-inspired machine learning Mucaki, Eliseos J. Zhao, Jonathan Z. L. Lizotte, Daniel J. Rogan, Peter K. Signal Transduct Target Ther Article The selection of effective genes that accurately predict chemotherapy responses might improve cancer outcomes. We compare optimized gene signatures for cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin responses in the same cell lines and validate each signature using data from patients with cancer. Supervised support vector machine learning is used to derive gene sets whose expression is related to the cell line GI(50) values by backwards feature selection with cross-validation. Specific genes and functional pathways distinguishing sensitive from resistant cell lines are identified by contrasting signatures obtained at extreme and median GI(50) thresholds. Ensembles of gene signatures at different thresholds are combined to reduce the dependence on specific GI(50) values for predicting drug responses. The most accurate gene signatures for each platin are: cisplatin: BARD1, BCL2, BCL2L1, CDKN2C, FAAP24, FEN1, MAP3K1, MAPK13, MAPK3, NFKB1, NFKB2, SLC22A5, SLC31A2, TLR4, and TWIST1; carboplatin: AKT1, EIF3K, ERCC1, GNGT1, GSR, MTHFR, NEDD4L, NLRP1, NRAS, RAF1, SGK1, TIGD1, TP53, VEGFB, and VEGFC; and oxaliplatin: BRAF, FCGR2A, IGF1, MSH2, NAGK, NFE2L2, NQO1, PANK3, SLC47A1, SLCO1B1, and UGT1A1. Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) patients with bladder, ovarian, and colorectal cancer were used to test the cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin signatures, resulting in 71.0%, 60.2%, and 54.5% accuracies in predicting disease recurrence and 59%, 61%, and 72% accuracies in predicting remission, respectively. One cisplatin signature predicted 100% of recurrence in non-smoking patients with bladder cancer (57% disease-free; N = 19), and 79% recurrence in smokers (62% disease-free; N = 35). This approach should be adaptable to other studies of chemotherapy responses, regardless of the drug or cancer types. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6329797/ /pubmed/30652029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41392-018-0034-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Mucaki, Eliseos J. Zhao, Jonathan Z. L. Lizotte, Daniel J. Rogan, Peter K. Predicting responses to platin chemotherapy agents with biochemically-inspired machine learning |
title | Predicting responses to platin chemotherapy agents with biochemically-inspired machine learning |
title_full | Predicting responses to platin chemotherapy agents with biochemically-inspired machine learning |
title_fullStr | Predicting responses to platin chemotherapy agents with biochemically-inspired machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting responses to platin chemotherapy agents with biochemically-inspired machine learning |
title_short | Predicting responses to platin chemotherapy agents with biochemically-inspired machine learning |
title_sort | predicting responses to platin chemotherapy agents with biochemically-inspired machine learning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30652029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41392-018-0034-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mucakieliseosj predictingresponsestoplatinchemotherapyagentswithbiochemicallyinspiredmachinelearning AT zhaojonathanzl predictingresponsestoplatinchemotherapyagentswithbiochemicallyinspiredmachinelearning AT lizottedanielj predictingresponsestoplatinchemotherapyagentswithbiochemicallyinspiredmachinelearning AT roganpeterk predictingresponsestoplatinchemotherapyagentswithbiochemicallyinspiredmachinelearning |