Cargando…
Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation
Understanding why some renewable resources are overharvested while others are conserved remains an important challenge. Most explanations focus on institutional or ecological differences among resources. Here, we provide theoretical and empirical evidence that conservation and overharvest can be alt...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806852116 |
_version_ | 1783386905082068992 |
---|---|
author | Tekwa, Edward W. Fenichel, Eli P. Levin, Simon A. Pinsky, Malin L. |
author_facet | Tekwa, Edward W. Fenichel, Eli P. Levin, Simon A. Pinsky, Malin L. |
author_sort | Tekwa, Edward W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding why some renewable resources are overharvested while others are conserved remains an important challenge. Most explanations focus on institutional or ecological differences among resources. Here, we provide theoretical and empirical evidence that conservation and overharvest can be alternative stable states within the same exclusive-resource management system because of path-dependent processes, including slow institutional adaptation. Surprisingly, this theory predicts that the alternative states of strong conservation or overharvest are most likely for resources that were previously thought to be easily conserved under optimal management or even open access. Quantitative analyses of harvest rates from 217 intensely managed fisheries supports the predictions. Fisheries’ harvest rates also showed transient dynamics characteristic of path dependence, as well as convergence to the alternative stable state after unexpected transitions. This statistical evidence for path dependence differs from previous empirical support that was based largely on case studies, experiments, and distributional analyses. Alternative stable states in conservation appear likely outcomes for many cooperatively managed renewable resources, which implies that achieving conservation outcomes hinges on harnessing existing policy tools to navigate transitions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6329967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63299672019-01-14 Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation Tekwa, Edward W. Fenichel, Eli P. Levin, Simon A. Pinsky, Malin L. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Understanding why some renewable resources are overharvested while others are conserved remains an important challenge. Most explanations focus on institutional or ecological differences among resources. Here, we provide theoretical and empirical evidence that conservation and overharvest can be alternative stable states within the same exclusive-resource management system because of path-dependent processes, including slow institutional adaptation. Surprisingly, this theory predicts that the alternative states of strong conservation or overharvest are most likely for resources that were previously thought to be easily conserved under optimal management or even open access. Quantitative analyses of harvest rates from 217 intensely managed fisheries supports the predictions. Fisheries’ harvest rates also showed transient dynamics characteristic of path dependence, as well as convergence to the alternative stable state after unexpected transitions. This statistical evidence for path dependence differs from previous empirical support that was based largely on case studies, experiments, and distributional analyses. Alternative stable states in conservation appear likely outcomes for many cooperatively managed renewable resources, which implies that achieving conservation outcomes hinges on harnessing existing policy tools to navigate transitions. National Academy of Sciences 2019-01-08 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6329967/ /pubmed/30567975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806852116 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Biological Sciences Tekwa, Edward W. Fenichel, Eli P. Levin, Simon A. Pinsky, Malin L. Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation |
title | Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation |
title_full | Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation |
title_fullStr | Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation |
title_full_unstemmed | Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation |
title_short | Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation |
title_sort | path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation |
topic | Biological Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806852116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tekwaedwardw pathdependentinstitutionsdrivealternativestablestatesinconservation AT fenichelelip pathdependentinstitutionsdrivealternativestablestatesinconservation AT levinsimona pathdependentinstitutionsdrivealternativestablestatesinconservation AT pinskymalinl pathdependentinstitutionsdrivealternativestablestatesinconservation |