Cargando…

Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation

Understanding why some renewable resources are overharvested while others are conserved remains an important challenge. Most explanations focus on institutional or ecological differences among resources. Here, we provide theoretical and empirical evidence that conservation and overharvest can be alt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tekwa, Edward W., Fenichel, Eli P., Levin, Simon A., Pinsky, Malin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806852116
_version_ 1783386905082068992
author Tekwa, Edward W.
Fenichel, Eli P.
Levin, Simon A.
Pinsky, Malin L.
author_facet Tekwa, Edward W.
Fenichel, Eli P.
Levin, Simon A.
Pinsky, Malin L.
author_sort Tekwa, Edward W.
collection PubMed
description Understanding why some renewable resources are overharvested while others are conserved remains an important challenge. Most explanations focus on institutional or ecological differences among resources. Here, we provide theoretical and empirical evidence that conservation and overharvest can be alternative stable states within the same exclusive-resource management system because of path-dependent processes, including slow institutional adaptation. Surprisingly, this theory predicts that the alternative states of strong conservation or overharvest are most likely for resources that were previously thought to be easily conserved under optimal management or even open access. Quantitative analyses of harvest rates from 217 intensely managed fisheries supports the predictions. Fisheries’ harvest rates also showed transient dynamics characteristic of path dependence, as well as convergence to the alternative stable state after unexpected transitions. This statistical evidence for path dependence differs from previous empirical support that was based largely on case studies, experiments, and distributional analyses. Alternative stable states in conservation appear likely outcomes for many cooperatively managed renewable resources, which implies that achieving conservation outcomes hinges on harnessing existing policy tools to navigate transitions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6329967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63299672019-01-14 Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation Tekwa, Edward W. Fenichel, Eli P. Levin, Simon A. Pinsky, Malin L. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Understanding why some renewable resources are overharvested while others are conserved remains an important challenge. Most explanations focus on institutional or ecological differences among resources. Here, we provide theoretical and empirical evidence that conservation and overharvest can be alternative stable states within the same exclusive-resource management system because of path-dependent processes, including slow institutional adaptation. Surprisingly, this theory predicts that the alternative states of strong conservation or overharvest are most likely for resources that were previously thought to be easily conserved under optimal management or even open access. Quantitative analyses of harvest rates from 217 intensely managed fisheries supports the predictions. Fisheries’ harvest rates also showed transient dynamics characteristic of path dependence, as well as convergence to the alternative stable state after unexpected transitions. This statistical evidence for path dependence differs from previous empirical support that was based largely on case studies, experiments, and distributional analyses. Alternative stable states in conservation appear likely outcomes for many cooperatively managed renewable resources, which implies that achieving conservation outcomes hinges on harnessing existing policy tools to navigate transitions. National Academy of Sciences 2019-01-08 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6329967/ /pubmed/30567975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806852116 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Tekwa, Edward W.
Fenichel, Eli P.
Levin, Simon A.
Pinsky, Malin L.
Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation
title Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation
title_full Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation
title_fullStr Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation
title_full_unstemmed Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation
title_short Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation
title_sort path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation
topic Biological Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6329967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30567975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806852116
work_keys_str_mv AT tekwaedwardw pathdependentinstitutionsdrivealternativestablestatesinconservation
AT fenichelelip pathdependentinstitutionsdrivealternativestablestatesinconservation
AT levinsimona pathdependentinstitutionsdrivealternativestablestatesinconservation
AT pinskymalinl pathdependentinstitutionsdrivealternativestablestatesinconservation