Cargando…
Standard-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Initial Non-eradication Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Background: Short-term use of standard-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is the first-line initial non-eradication treatment for duodenal ulcer (DU), but the choice on individual PPI drug is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30666204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01512 |
_version_ | 1783386944327122944 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Jiaxing Ge, Long Hill, Matt Liang, Yi Xie, Juan Cui, Dejun Li, Xiaosi Zheng, Wenyi He, Rui |
author_facet | Zhang, Jiaxing Ge, Long Hill, Matt Liang, Yi Xie, Juan Cui, Dejun Li, Xiaosi Zheng, Wenyi He, Rui |
author_sort | Zhang, Jiaxing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Short-term use of standard-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is the first-line initial non-eradication treatment for duodenal ulcer (DU), but the choice on individual PPI drug is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of standard-dose PPI medications in the initial non-eradication treatment of DU. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP database, and the Wanfang database from their earliest records to September 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating omeprazole (20 mg/day), pantoprazole (40 mg/day), lansoprazole (30 mg/day), rabeprazole (20 mg/day), ilaprazole (10 mg/day), ranitidine (300 mg/day), famotidine (40 mg/day), or placebo for DU were included. The outcomes were 4-week ulcer healing rate (4-UHR) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). A network meta-analysis (NMA) using a Bayesian random effects model was conducted, and a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree was performed from the payer’s perspective over 1 year. Results: A total of 62 RCTs involving 10,339 participants (eight interventions) were included. The NMA showed that all the PPIs significantly increased the 4-UHR compared to H(2) receptor antagonists (H(2)RA) and placebo, while there was no significant difference for 4-UHR among PPIs. As to the incidence of AEs, no significant difference was observed among PPIs, H(2)RA, and placebo during 4-week follow-up. Based on the costs of both PPIs and management of AEs in China, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year (in US dollars) for pantoprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, and ilaprazole compared to omeprazole corresponded to $5134.67, $17801.67, $25488.31, and $44572.22, respectively. Conclusion: Although the efficacy and tolerance of different PPIs are similar in the initial non-eradication treatment of DU, pantoprazole (40 mg/day) seems to be the most cost-effective option in China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6330312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63303122019-01-21 Standard-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Initial Non-eradication Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Zhang, Jiaxing Ge, Long Hill, Matt Liang, Yi Xie, Juan Cui, Dejun Li, Xiaosi Zheng, Wenyi He, Rui Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Short-term use of standard-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is the first-line initial non-eradication treatment for duodenal ulcer (DU), but the choice on individual PPI drug is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of standard-dose PPI medications in the initial non-eradication treatment of DU. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP database, and the Wanfang database from their earliest records to September 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating omeprazole (20 mg/day), pantoprazole (40 mg/day), lansoprazole (30 mg/day), rabeprazole (20 mg/day), ilaprazole (10 mg/day), ranitidine (300 mg/day), famotidine (40 mg/day), or placebo for DU were included. The outcomes were 4-week ulcer healing rate (4-UHR) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). A network meta-analysis (NMA) using a Bayesian random effects model was conducted, and a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree was performed from the payer’s perspective over 1 year. Results: A total of 62 RCTs involving 10,339 participants (eight interventions) were included. The NMA showed that all the PPIs significantly increased the 4-UHR compared to H(2) receptor antagonists (H(2)RA) and placebo, while there was no significant difference for 4-UHR among PPIs. As to the incidence of AEs, no significant difference was observed among PPIs, H(2)RA, and placebo during 4-week follow-up. Based on the costs of both PPIs and management of AEs in China, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year (in US dollars) for pantoprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, and ilaprazole compared to omeprazole corresponded to $5134.67, $17801.67, $25488.31, and $44572.22, respectively. Conclusion: Although the efficacy and tolerance of different PPIs are similar in the initial non-eradication treatment of DU, pantoprazole (40 mg/day) seems to be the most cost-effective option in China. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6330312/ /pubmed/30666204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01512 Text en Copyright © 2019 Zhang, Ge, Hill, Liang, Xie, Cui, Li, Zheng and He. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Zhang, Jiaxing Ge, Long Hill, Matt Liang, Yi Xie, Juan Cui, Dejun Li, Xiaosi Zheng, Wenyi He, Rui Standard-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Initial Non-eradication Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title | Standard-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Initial Non-eradication Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_full | Standard-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Initial Non-eradication Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_fullStr | Standard-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Initial Non-eradication Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Standard-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Initial Non-eradication Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_short | Standard-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Initial Non-eradication Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_sort | standard-dose proton pump inhibitors in the initial non-eradication treatment of duodenal ulcer: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30666204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjiaxing standarddoseprotonpumpinhibitorsintheinitialnoneradicationtreatmentofduodenalulcersystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT gelong standarddoseprotonpumpinhibitorsintheinitialnoneradicationtreatmentofduodenalulcersystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT hillmatt standarddoseprotonpumpinhibitorsintheinitialnoneradicationtreatmentofduodenalulcersystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT liangyi standarddoseprotonpumpinhibitorsintheinitialnoneradicationtreatmentofduodenalulcersystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT xiejuan standarddoseprotonpumpinhibitorsintheinitialnoneradicationtreatmentofduodenalulcersystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT cuidejun standarddoseprotonpumpinhibitorsintheinitialnoneradicationtreatmentofduodenalulcersystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT lixiaosi standarddoseprotonpumpinhibitorsintheinitialnoneradicationtreatmentofduodenalulcersystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT zhengwenyi standarddoseprotonpumpinhibitorsintheinitialnoneradicationtreatmentofduodenalulcersystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT herui standarddoseprotonpumpinhibitorsintheinitialnoneradicationtreatmentofduodenalulcersystematicreviewnetworkmetaanalysisandcosteffectivenessanalysis |