Cargando…
Indicators for monitoring maternal and neonatal quality care: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Research and different organizations have proposed indicators to monitor the quality of maternal and child healthcare, such indicators are used for different purposes. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of indicators for the central phases of the maternal and child healthcare cont...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30634946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2173-2 |
_version_ | 1783386961948442624 |
---|---|
author | Saturno-Hernández, Pedro J. Martínez-Nicolás, Ismael Moreno-Zegbe, Estephania Fernández-Elorriaga, María Poblano-Verástegui, Ofelia |
author_facet | Saturno-Hernández, Pedro J. Martínez-Nicolás, Ismael Moreno-Zegbe, Estephania Fernández-Elorriaga, María Poblano-Verástegui, Ofelia |
author_sort | Saturno-Hernández, Pedro J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Research and different organizations have proposed indicators to monitor the quality of maternal and child healthcare, such indicators are used for different purposes. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of indicators for the central phases of the maternal and child healthcare continuum of care (pregnancy, childbirth, newborn care and postpartum). METHOD: A search conducted using international repositories, national and international indicator sets, scientific articles published between 2012 and 2016, and grey literature. The eligibility criteria was documents in Spanish or English with indicators to monitor aspects of the continuum of care phases of interest. The identified indicators were characterized as follows: formula, justification, evidence level, pilot study, indicator type, phase of the continuum, intended organizational level of application, level of care, and income level of the countries. Selection was based on the characteristics associated with scientific soundness (formula, evidence level, and reliability). RESULTS: We identified 1791 indicators. Three hundred forty-six were duplicated, which resulted in 1445 indicators for analysis. Only 6.7% indicators exhibited all requirements for scientific soundness. The distribution by the classifying variables is clearly uneven, with a predominance of indicators for childbirth, hospital care and facility level. CONCLUSIONS: There is a broad choice of indicators for maternal and child healthcare. However, most indicators lack demonstrated scientific soundness and refer to particular continuum phases and levels within the healthcare system. Additional efforts are needed to identify good indicators for a comprehensive maternal and child healthcare monitoring system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2173-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6330388 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63303882019-01-16 Indicators for monitoring maternal and neonatal quality care: a systematic review Saturno-Hernández, Pedro J. Martínez-Nicolás, Ismael Moreno-Zegbe, Estephania Fernández-Elorriaga, María Poblano-Verástegui, Ofelia BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Research and different organizations have proposed indicators to monitor the quality of maternal and child healthcare, such indicators are used for different purposes. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of indicators for the central phases of the maternal and child healthcare continuum of care (pregnancy, childbirth, newborn care and postpartum). METHOD: A search conducted using international repositories, national and international indicator sets, scientific articles published between 2012 and 2016, and grey literature. The eligibility criteria was documents in Spanish or English with indicators to monitor aspects of the continuum of care phases of interest. The identified indicators were characterized as follows: formula, justification, evidence level, pilot study, indicator type, phase of the continuum, intended organizational level of application, level of care, and income level of the countries. Selection was based on the characteristics associated with scientific soundness (formula, evidence level, and reliability). RESULTS: We identified 1791 indicators. Three hundred forty-six were duplicated, which resulted in 1445 indicators for analysis. Only 6.7% indicators exhibited all requirements for scientific soundness. The distribution by the classifying variables is clearly uneven, with a predominance of indicators for childbirth, hospital care and facility level. CONCLUSIONS: There is a broad choice of indicators for maternal and child healthcare. However, most indicators lack demonstrated scientific soundness and refer to particular continuum phases and levels within the healthcare system. Additional efforts are needed to identify good indicators for a comprehensive maternal and child healthcare monitoring system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2173-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6330388/ /pubmed/30634946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2173-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Saturno-Hernández, Pedro J. Martínez-Nicolás, Ismael Moreno-Zegbe, Estephania Fernández-Elorriaga, María Poblano-Verástegui, Ofelia Indicators for monitoring maternal and neonatal quality care: a systematic review |
title | Indicators for monitoring maternal and neonatal quality care: a systematic review |
title_full | Indicators for monitoring maternal and neonatal quality care: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Indicators for monitoring maternal and neonatal quality care: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Indicators for monitoring maternal and neonatal quality care: a systematic review |
title_short | Indicators for monitoring maternal and neonatal quality care: a systematic review |
title_sort | indicators for monitoring maternal and neonatal quality care: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30634946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2173-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saturnohernandezpedroj indicatorsformonitoringmaternalandneonatalqualitycareasystematicreview AT martineznicolasismael indicatorsformonitoringmaternalandneonatalqualitycareasystematicreview AT morenozegbeestephania indicatorsformonitoringmaternalandneonatalqualitycareasystematicreview AT fernandezelorriagamaria indicatorsformonitoringmaternalandneonatalqualitycareasystematicreview AT poblanoverasteguiofelia indicatorsformonitoringmaternalandneonatalqualitycareasystematicreview |