Cargando…

Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in maternal anticoagulation therapy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is widely used due to the increasing awareness of maternal hypercoagulability. Few studies have reported the use of minimally invasive spinal anesthesia in these parturients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Dan, Zhu, Linjie, Chen, Jie, Zhou, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30636632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0679-1
_version_ 1783386965274525696
author Huang, Dan
Zhu, Linjie
Chen, Jie
Zhou, Jie
author_facet Huang, Dan
Zhu, Linjie
Chen, Jie
Zhou, Jie
author_sort Huang, Dan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is widely used due to the increasing awareness of maternal hypercoagulability. Few studies have reported the use of minimally invasive spinal anesthesia in these parturients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive spinal anesthesia in parturients with anticoagulation therapy undergoing cesarean section. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled study conducted in 239 parturients using anticoagulants and undergoing selective cesarean section. 37 parturients withdrew, and finally parturients received spinal anesthesia using 27gauge pen type fine spinal needles (experimental group, n = 110) and 22gauge traditional spinal needles (control group, n = 92). The primary efficacy outcomes included low back pain (LBP) and postdural puncture headache (PDPH) after delivery. Secondary efficacy outcomes included visual analogue scale during subarachnoid puncture (VASdural), difference between visual analogue scale (VAS) during peripheral venipuncture and VASdural (∆VAS), VAS of back puncture point 24, 48 and 72 h after operation (VASdural-24 h, VASdural-48 h and VASdural-72 h, respectively), maternal satisfaction and hospitalization stay. RESULTS: No parturient had PDPH and was suspected with spinal or intracranial haematoma in two groups. There was no significant difference in VASlbp-24 h, VASlbp-48 h and VASlbp-72 h (P = 0.056; P = 0.813; P = 0.189, respectively) between two groups. In experimental group, VASdural (P = 0.017), ∆VAS (P = 0.001) and VASdural-24 h (P < 0.0001) were lower, whereas maternal satisfaction was higher (P = 0.046). There was no significant difference in VASdural-48 h, VASdural-72 h, urination function, strength recovery and hospitalization stay (P = 0.069; P = 0.667; P = 0.105; P = 0.133; P = 0.754, respectively) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia provided lower VASdural, VASdrual-24 h and a higher maternal satisfaction. Hence, it is considered as a safe, reliable and reasonable option for cesarean section parturients during maternal anticoagulation therapy with normal platelet count and coagulation time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov at November 11th, 2016 (NCT02987192).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6330402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63304022019-01-16 Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in maternal anticoagulation therapy: a randomized controlled trial Huang, Dan Zhu, Linjie Chen, Jie Zhou, Jie BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is widely used due to the increasing awareness of maternal hypercoagulability. Few studies have reported the use of minimally invasive spinal anesthesia in these parturients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive spinal anesthesia in parturients with anticoagulation therapy undergoing cesarean section. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled study conducted in 239 parturients using anticoagulants and undergoing selective cesarean section. 37 parturients withdrew, and finally parturients received spinal anesthesia using 27gauge pen type fine spinal needles (experimental group, n = 110) and 22gauge traditional spinal needles (control group, n = 92). The primary efficacy outcomes included low back pain (LBP) and postdural puncture headache (PDPH) after delivery. Secondary efficacy outcomes included visual analogue scale during subarachnoid puncture (VASdural), difference between visual analogue scale (VAS) during peripheral venipuncture and VASdural (∆VAS), VAS of back puncture point 24, 48 and 72 h after operation (VASdural-24 h, VASdural-48 h and VASdural-72 h, respectively), maternal satisfaction and hospitalization stay. RESULTS: No parturient had PDPH and was suspected with spinal or intracranial haematoma in two groups. There was no significant difference in VASlbp-24 h, VASlbp-48 h and VASlbp-72 h (P = 0.056; P = 0.813; P = 0.189, respectively) between two groups. In experimental group, VASdural (P = 0.017), ∆VAS (P = 0.001) and VASdural-24 h (P < 0.0001) were lower, whereas maternal satisfaction was higher (P = 0.046). There was no significant difference in VASdural-48 h, VASdural-72 h, urination function, strength recovery and hospitalization stay (P = 0.069; P = 0.667; P = 0.105; P = 0.133; P = 0.754, respectively) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia provided lower VASdural, VASdrual-24 h and a higher maternal satisfaction. Hence, it is considered as a safe, reliable and reasonable option for cesarean section parturients during maternal anticoagulation therapy with normal platelet count and coagulation time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov at November 11th, 2016 (NCT02987192). BioMed Central 2019-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6330402/ /pubmed/30636632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0679-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Dan
Zhu, Linjie
Chen, Jie
Zhou, Jie
Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in maternal anticoagulation therapy: a randomized controlled trial
title Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in maternal anticoagulation therapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in maternal anticoagulation therapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in maternal anticoagulation therapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in maternal anticoagulation therapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in maternal anticoagulation therapy: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort minimally invasive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in maternal anticoagulation therapy: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30636632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0679-1
work_keys_str_mv AT huangdan minimallyinvasivespinalanesthesiaforcesareansectioninmaternalanticoagulationtherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhulinjie minimallyinvasivespinalanesthesiaforcesareansectioninmaternalanticoagulationtherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenjie minimallyinvasivespinalanesthesiaforcesareansectioninmaternalanticoagulationtherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhoujie minimallyinvasivespinalanesthesiaforcesareansectioninmaternalanticoagulationtherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial