Cargando…

Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal

Proponents of artificial reef (AR) deployment are often motivated by the usefulness of such structures. The usefulness of ARs is related to their capability of providing ecosystem services/additional functions. We present two distinct Portuguese AR case studies: (1) The Nazaré reef off the central c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramos, Jorge, Lino, Pedro G., Himes-Cornell, Amber, Santos, Miguel N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647998
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6206
_version_ 1783387060472643584
author Ramos, Jorge
Lino, Pedro G.
Himes-Cornell, Amber
Santos, Miguel N.
author_facet Ramos, Jorge
Lino, Pedro G.
Himes-Cornell, Amber
Santos, Miguel N.
author_sort Ramos, Jorge
collection PubMed
description Proponents of artificial reef (AR) deployment are often motivated by the usefulness of such structures. The usefulness of ARs is related to their capability of providing ecosystem services/additional functions. We present two distinct Portuguese AR case studies: (1) The Nazaré reef off the central coast of Portugal and (2) the Oura reef off the Algarve coast. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with local fishermen in the fishing towns of Nazaré and Quarteira pre-and post-AR deployment. The main focus of the interviews was to understand fishermen’s perception of AR usefulness (or lack thereof) in terms of nine ecosystem services/additional functions potentially provided by the ARs. We tested the null hypothesis that ARs do not provide additional ecosystem services/additional functions. When queried pre-AR deployment, fishermen indicated that ARs are most likely to provide three ecosystem services: “habitat and refuge,” “biodiversity preservation” and “food production.” Fishermen had similar perceptions post-deployment. For the Nazaré reef, fishermen tended to have a positive or neutral perception of ecosystem services/additional functions being provided by ARs. For the Oura reef, fishermen tended to have a mostly neutral perception of AR ecosystem services; however, there were also some positive and other negative perceptions. It was difficult for stakeholders to conceptualize some of the ecosystem services/additional functions provided by ARs prior to actively using them. As a result, some stakeholders changed their perception of the ecosystem services/additional functions after using the structures. These results indicate that stakeholders likely need to perceive ARs as useful in order for them to provide their support for AR installation. Likewise, their support is often needed to justify the use of public funds to install ARs, therefore making it imperative for resource managers to undertake similar interviews with fishermen when considering the use of ARs in other areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6330946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63309462019-01-15 Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal Ramos, Jorge Lino, Pedro G. Himes-Cornell, Amber Santos, Miguel N. PeerJ Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science Proponents of artificial reef (AR) deployment are often motivated by the usefulness of such structures. The usefulness of ARs is related to their capability of providing ecosystem services/additional functions. We present two distinct Portuguese AR case studies: (1) The Nazaré reef off the central coast of Portugal and (2) the Oura reef off the Algarve coast. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with local fishermen in the fishing towns of Nazaré and Quarteira pre-and post-AR deployment. The main focus of the interviews was to understand fishermen’s perception of AR usefulness (or lack thereof) in terms of nine ecosystem services/additional functions potentially provided by the ARs. We tested the null hypothesis that ARs do not provide additional ecosystem services/additional functions. When queried pre-AR deployment, fishermen indicated that ARs are most likely to provide three ecosystem services: “habitat and refuge,” “biodiversity preservation” and “food production.” Fishermen had similar perceptions post-deployment. For the Nazaré reef, fishermen tended to have a positive or neutral perception of ecosystem services/additional functions being provided by ARs. For the Oura reef, fishermen tended to have a mostly neutral perception of AR ecosystem services; however, there were also some positive and other negative perceptions. It was difficult for stakeholders to conceptualize some of the ecosystem services/additional functions provided by ARs prior to actively using them. As a result, some stakeholders changed their perception of the ecosystem services/additional functions after using the structures. These results indicate that stakeholders likely need to perceive ARs as useful in order for them to provide their support for AR installation. Likewise, their support is often needed to justify the use of public funds to install ARs, therefore making it imperative for resource managers to undertake similar interviews with fishermen when considering the use of ARs in other areas. PeerJ Inc. 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6330946/ /pubmed/30647998 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6206 Text en © 2019 Ramos et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science
Ramos, Jorge
Lino, Pedro G.
Himes-Cornell, Amber
Santos, Miguel N.
Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal
title Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal
title_full Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal
title_fullStr Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal
title_short Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal
title_sort local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in portugal
topic Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647998
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6206
work_keys_str_mv AT ramosjorge localfishermensperceptionsoftheusefulnessofartificialreefecosystemservicesinportugal
AT linopedrog localfishermensperceptionsoftheusefulnessofartificialreefecosystemservicesinportugal
AT himescornellamber localfishermensperceptionsoftheusefulnessofartificialreefecosystemservicesinportugal
AT santosmigueln localfishermensperceptionsoftheusefulnessofartificialreefecosystemservicesinportugal