Cargando…
Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal
Proponents of artificial reef (AR) deployment are often motivated by the usefulness of such structures. The usefulness of ARs is related to their capability of providing ecosystem services/additional functions. We present two distinct Portuguese AR case studies: (1) The Nazaré reef off the central c...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647998 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6206 |
_version_ | 1783387060472643584 |
---|---|
author | Ramos, Jorge Lino, Pedro G. Himes-Cornell, Amber Santos, Miguel N. |
author_facet | Ramos, Jorge Lino, Pedro G. Himes-Cornell, Amber Santos, Miguel N. |
author_sort | Ramos, Jorge |
collection | PubMed |
description | Proponents of artificial reef (AR) deployment are often motivated by the usefulness of such structures. The usefulness of ARs is related to their capability of providing ecosystem services/additional functions. We present two distinct Portuguese AR case studies: (1) The Nazaré reef off the central coast of Portugal and (2) the Oura reef off the Algarve coast. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with local fishermen in the fishing towns of Nazaré and Quarteira pre-and post-AR deployment. The main focus of the interviews was to understand fishermen’s perception of AR usefulness (or lack thereof) in terms of nine ecosystem services/additional functions potentially provided by the ARs. We tested the null hypothesis that ARs do not provide additional ecosystem services/additional functions. When queried pre-AR deployment, fishermen indicated that ARs are most likely to provide three ecosystem services: “habitat and refuge,” “biodiversity preservation” and “food production.” Fishermen had similar perceptions post-deployment. For the Nazaré reef, fishermen tended to have a positive or neutral perception of ecosystem services/additional functions being provided by ARs. For the Oura reef, fishermen tended to have a mostly neutral perception of AR ecosystem services; however, there were also some positive and other negative perceptions. It was difficult for stakeholders to conceptualize some of the ecosystem services/additional functions provided by ARs prior to actively using them. As a result, some stakeholders changed their perception of the ecosystem services/additional functions after using the structures. These results indicate that stakeholders likely need to perceive ARs as useful in order for them to provide their support for AR installation. Likewise, their support is often needed to justify the use of public funds to install ARs, therefore making it imperative for resource managers to undertake similar interviews with fishermen when considering the use of ARs in other areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6330946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63309462019-01-15 Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal Ramos, Jorge Lino, Pedro G. Himes-Cornell, Amber Santos, Miguel N. PeerJ Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science Proponents of artificial reef (AR) deployment are often motivated by the usefulness of such structures. The usefulness of ARs is related to their capability of providing ecosystem services/additional functions. We present two distinct Portuguese AR case studies: (1) The Nazaré reef off the central coast of Portugal and (2) the Oura reef off the Algarve coast. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with local fishermen in the fishing towns of Nazaré and Quarteira pre-and post-AR deployment. The main focus of the interviews was to understand fishermen’s perception of AR usefulness (or lack thereof) in terms of nine ecosystem services/additional functions potentially provided by the ARs. We tested the null hypothesis that ARs do not provide additional ecosystem services/additional functions. When queried pre-AR deployment, fishermen indicated that ARs are most likely to provide three ecosystem services: “habitat and refuge,” “biodiversity preservation” and “food production.” Fishermen had similar perceptions post-deployment. For the Nazaré reef, fishermen tended to have a positive or neutral perception of ecosystem services/additional functions being provided by ARs. For the Oura reef, fishermen tended to have a mostly neutral perception of AR ecosystem services; however, there were also some positive and other negative perceptions. It was difficult for stakeholders to conceptualize some of the ecosystem services/additional functions provided by ARs prior to actively using them. As a result, some stakeholders changed their perception of the ecosystem services/additional functions after using the structures. These results indicate that stakeholders likely need to perceive ARs as useful in order for them to provide their support for AR installation. Likewise, their support is often needed to justify the use of public funds to install ARs, therefore making it imperative for resource managers to undertake similar interviews with fishermen when considering the use of ARs in other areas. PeerJ Inc. 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6330946/ /pubmed/30647998 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6206 Text en © 2019 Ramos et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science Ramos, Jorge Lino, Pedro G. Himes-Cornell, Amber Santos, Miguel N. Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal |
title | Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal |
title_full | Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal |
title_fullStr | Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal |
title_full_unstemmed | Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal |
title_short | Local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal |
title_sort | local fishermen’s perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in portugal |
topic | Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6330946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647998 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramosjorge localfishermensperceptionsoftheusefulnessofartificialreefecosystemservicesinportugal AT linopedrog localfishermensperceptionsoftheusefulnessofartificialreefecosystemservicesinportugal AT himescornellamber localfishermensperceptionsoftheusefulnessofartificialreefecosystemservicesinportugal AT santosmigueln localfishermensperceptionsoftheusefulnessofartificialreefecosystemservicesinportugal |