Cargando…
Rifamycin SV-MMX(®) for treatment of travellers’ diarrhea: equally effective as ciprofloxacin and not associated with the acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria
BACKGROUND: The novel oral antibiotic formulation Rifamycin SV-MMX(®), with a targeted delivery to the distal small bowel and colon, was superior to placebo in treating travellers’ diarrhea (TD) in a previous study. Thus, a study was designed to compare this poorly absorbed antibiotic with the syste...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30462260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jtm/tay116 |
_version_ | 1783387091721256960 |
---|---|
author | Steffen, Robert Jiang, Zhi-Dong Gracias Garcia, Mónica L Araujo, Prithi Stiess, Michael Nacak, Tanju Greinwald, Roland DuPont, Herbert L |
author_facet | Steffen, Robert Jiang, Zhi-Dong Gracias Garcia, Mónica L Araujo, Prithi Stiess, Michael Nacak, Tanju Greinwald, Roland DuPont, Herbert L |
author_sort | Steffen, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The novel oral antibiotic formulation Rifamycin SV-MMX(®), with a targeted delivery to the distal small bowel and colon, was superior to placebo in treating travellers’ diarrhea (TD) in a previous study. Thus, a study was designed to compare this poorly absorbed antibiotic with the systemic agent ciprofloxacin. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind phase 3 study (ERASE), the efficacy and safety of Rifamycin SV-MMX® 400 mg twice daily (RIF-MMX) was compared with ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily in the oral treatment of TD. Overall, 835 international visitors to India, Guatemala or Ecuador with acute TD were randomized to receive a 3-day treatment with RIF-MMX (n = 420) or ciprofloxacin (n = 415). Primary endpoint was time to last unformed stool (TLUS), after which clinical cure was declared. Stools samples for microbiological evaluation were collected at the baseline visit and the end of treatment visit. RESULTS: Median TLUS in the RIF-MMX group was 42.8 h versus 36.8 h in the ciprofloxacin group indicating non-inferiority of RIF-MMX to ciprofloxacin (P = 0.0035). Secondary efficacy endpoint results including clinical cure rate, treatment failure rate, requirement of rescue therapy as well as microbiological eradication rate confirmed those of the primary analysis indicating equal efficacy for both compounds. While patients receiving ciprofloxacin showed a significant increase of Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase Producing—Escherichia coli (ESBL-E. Coli) colonization rates after 3-days treatment (6.9%), rates did not increase in patients receiving RIF-MMX (−0.3%). Both drugs were well-tolerated and safe. CONCLUSION: The novel multi-matrix formulation of the broad-spectrum, poorly absorbed antibiotic Rifamycin SV was found non-inferior to the systemic antibiotic ciprofloxacin in the oral treatment of non-dysenteric TD with the advantage of a lower risk of ESBL-E. Coli acquisition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6331114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63311142019-01-29 Rifamycin SV-MMX(®) for treatment of travellers’ diarrhea: equally effective as ciprofloxacin and not associated with the acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria Steffen, Robert Jiang, Zhi-Dong Gracias Garcia, Mónica L Araujo, Prithi Stiess, Michael Nacak, Tanju Greinwald, Roland DuPont, Herbert L J Travel Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The novel oral antibiotic formulation Rifamycin SV-MMX(®), with a targeted delivery to the distal small bowel and colon, was superior to placebo in treating travellers’ diarrhea (TD) in a previous study. Thus, a study was designed to compare this poorly absorbed antibiotic with the systemic agent ciprofloxacin. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind phase 3 study (ERASE), the efficacy and safety of Rifamycin SV-MMX® 400 mg twice daily (RIF-MMX) was compared with ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily in the oral treatment of TD. Overall, 835 international visitors to India, Guatemala or Ecuador with acute TD were randomized to receive a 3-day treatment with RIF-MMX (n = 420) or ciprofloxacin (n = 415). Primary endpoint was time to last unformed stool (TLUS), after which clinical cure was declared. Stools samples for microbiological evaluation were collected at the baseline visit and the end of treatment visit. RESULTS: Median TLUS in the RIF-MMX group was 42.8 h versus 36.8 h in the ciprofloxacin group indicating non-inferiority of RIF-MMX to ciprofloxacin (P = 0.0035). Secondary efficacy endpoint results including clinical cure rate, treatment failure rate, requirement of rescue therapy as well as microbiological eradication rate confirmed those of the primary analysis indicating equal efficacy for both compounds. While patients receiving ciprofloxacin showed a significant increase of Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase Producing—Escherichia coli (ESBL-E. Coli) colonization rates after 3-days treatment (6.9%), rates did not increase in patients receiving RIF-MMX (−0.3%). Both drugs were well-tolerated and safe. CONCLUSION: The novel multi-matrix formulation of the broad-spectrum, poorly absorbed antibiotic Rifamycin SV was found non-inferior to the systemic antibiotic ciprofloxacin in the oral treatment of non-dysenteric TD with the advantage of a lower risk of ESBL-E. Coli acquisition. Oxford University Press 2018-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6331114/ /pubmed/30462260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jtm/tay116 Text en © International Society of Travel Medicine, 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Steffen, Robert Jiang, Zhi-Dong Gracias Garcia, Mónica L Araujo, Prithi Stiess, Michael Nacak, Tanju Greinwald, Roland DuPont, Herbert L Rifamycin SV-MMX(®) for treatment of travellers’ diarrhea: equally effective as ciprofloxacin and not associated with the acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria |
title | Rifamycin SV-MMX(®) for treatment of travellers’ diarrhea: equally effective as ciprofloxacin and not associated with the acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria |
title_full | Rifamycin SV-MMX(®) for treatment of travellers’ diarrhea: equally effective as ciprofloxacin and not associated with the acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria |
title_fullStr | Rifamycin SV-MMX(®) for treatment of travellers’ diarrhea: equally effective as ciprofloxacin and not associated with the acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Rifamycin SV-MMX(®) for treatment of travellers’ diarrhea: equally effective as ciprofloxacin and not associated with the acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria |
title_short | Rifamycin SV-MMX(®) for treatment of travellers’ diarrhea: equally effective as ciprofloxacin and not associated with the acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria |
title_sort | rifamycin sv-mmx(®) for treatment of travellers’ diarrhea: equally effective as ciprofloxacin and not associated with the acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30462260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jtm/tay116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steffenrobert rifamycinsvmmxfortreatmentoftravellersdiarrheaequallyeffectiveasciprofloxacinandnotassociatedwiththeacquisitionofmultidrugresistantbacteria AT jiangzhidong rifamycinsvmmxfortreatmentoftravellersdiarrheaequallyeffectiveasciprofloxacinandnotassociatedwiththeacquisitionofmultidrugresistantbacteria AT graciasgarciamonical rifamycinsvmmxfortreatmentoftravellersdiarrheaequallyeffectiveasciprofloxacinandnotassociatedwiththeacquisitionofmultidrugresistantbacteria AT araujoprithi rifamycinsvmmxfortreatmentoftravellersdiarrheaequallyeffectiveasciprofloxacinandnotassociatedwiththeacquisitionofmultidrugresistantbacteria AT stiessmichael rifamycinsvmmxfortreatmentoftravellersdiarrheaequallyeffectiveasciprofloxacinandnotassociatedwiththeacquisitionofmultidrugresistantbacteria AT nacaktanju rifamycinsvmmxfortreatmentoftravellersdiarrheaequallyeffectiveasciprofloxacinandnotassociatedwiththeacquisitionofmultidrugresistantbacteria AT greinwaldroland rifamycinsvmmxfortreatmentoftravellersdiarrheaequallyeffectiveasciprofloxacinandnotassociatedwiththeacquisitionofmultidrugresistantbacteria AT dupontherbertl rifamycinsvmmxfortreatmentoftravellersdiarrheaequallyeffectiveasciprofloxacinandnotassociatedwiththeacquisitionofmultidrugresistantbacteria |