Cargando…
Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Introduction Low-tone sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is a well-recognized disease, in which the hearing loss is restricted to low frequencies. In contrast to low-tone SSHL, high-tone SSHL is characterized by high-frequency (4,000, 8,000 Hz) hearing loss and preservation of low-, middle-fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1657789 |
_version_ | 1783387111513128960 |
---|---|
author | Psillas, George Rizou, Aikaterini Rachovitsas, Dimitrios Tsiropoulos, Gabriel Constantinidis, Jiannis |
author_facet | Psillas, George Rizou, Aikaterini Rachovitsas, Dimitrios Tsiropoulos, Gabriel Constantinidis, Jiannis |
author_sort | Psillas, George |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Low-tone sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is a well-recognized disease, in which the hearing loss is restricted to low frequencies. In contrast to low-tone SSHL, high-tone SSHL is characterized by high-frequency (4,000, 8,000 Hz) hearing loss and preservation of low-, middle-frequency hearing. Objective The objective of this study is to compare the hearing recovery and long-term outcome of low-tone SSHL with those of patients affected by high-tone SSHL in a follow-up of ∼ 3 years. Methods The low-tone SSHL and high-tone SSHL groups included 27 and 20 patients, respectively; the patients of both groups were treated with intravenous steroids. Predictive factors (gender, affected side, delay of treatment, follow-up time) were also examined. Results Overall, complete hearing recovery was observed in 77.7% of the patients in the low-tone SSHL group and in 15% of the patients in the high-tone SSHL group. In the high-tone SSHL group, a higher proportion of patients reported tinnitus compared with the low-tone SSHL group (13 cases [65%] versus 3 cases [11%]); however, recurrences were more common in the low-tone SSHL (22%, 6 patients) compared with the high-tone SSHL (2 cases [10%]) group. No predictive factor was found to statistically impact on hearing outcome. Conclusion After initial therapy, the low-tone SSHL patients have more favorable hearing outcome than high-tone SSHL patients. However, recurrences occurred more frequently in the low-tone SSHL group, while the high-tone SSHL group was more often accompanied by residual symptoms, such as tinnitus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6331312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63313122019-01-15 Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Psillas, George Rizou, Aikaterini Rachovitsas, Dimitrios Tsiropoulos, Gabriel Constantinidis, Jiannis Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction Low-tone sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is a well-recognized disease, in which the hearing loss is restricted to low frequencies. In contrast to low-tone SSHL, high-tone SSHL is characterized by high-frequency (4,000, 8,000 Hz) hearing loss and preservation of low-, middle-frequency hearing. Objective The objective of this study is to compare the hearing recovery and long-term outcome of low-tone SSHL with those of patients affected by high-tone SSHL in a follow-up of ∼ 3 years. Methods The low-tone SSHL and high-tone SSHL groups included 27 and 20 patients, respectively; the patients of both groups were treated with intravenous steroids. Predictive factors (gender, affected side, delay of treatment, follow-up time) were also examined. Results Overall, complete hearing recovery was observed in 77.7% of the patients in the low-tone SSHL group and in 15% of the patients in the high-tone SSHL group. In the high-tone SSHL group, a higher proportion of patients reported tinnitus compared with the low-tone SSHL group (13 cases [65%] versus 3 cases [11%]); however, recurrences were more common in the low-tone SSHL (22%, 6 patients) compared with the high-tone SSHL (2 cases [10%]) group. No predictive factor was found to statistically impact on hearing outcome. Conclusion After initial therapy, the low-tone SSHL patients have more favorable hearing outcome than high-tone SSHL patients. However, recurrences occurred more frequently in the low-tone SSHL group, while the high-tone SSHL group was more often accompanied by residual symptoms, such as tinnitus. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2019-01 2018-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6331312/ /pubmed/30647786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1657789 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Psillas, George Rizou, Aikaterini Rachovitsas, Dimitrios Tsiropoulos, Gabriel Constantinidis, Jiannis Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss |
title | Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss |
title_full | Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss |
title_fullStr | Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss |
title_full_unstemmed | Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss |
title_short | Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss |
title_sort | hearing outcome of low-tone compared to high-tone sudden sensorineural hearing loss |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1657789 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT psillasgeorge hearingoutcomeoflowtonecomparedtohightonesuddensensorineuralhearingloss AT rizouaikaterini hearingoutcomeoflowtonecomparedtohightonesuddensensorineuralhearingloss AT rachovitsasdimitrios hearingoutcomeoflowtonecomparedtohightonesuddensensorineuralhearingloss AT tsiropoulosgabriel hearingoutcomeoflowtonecomparedtohightonesuddensensorineuralhearingloss AT constantinidisjiannis hearingoutcomeoflowtonecomparedtohightonesuddensensorineuralhearingloss |