Cargando…

Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Introduction  Low-tone sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is a well-recognized disease, in which the hearing loss is restricted to low frequencies. In contrast to low-tone SSHL, high-tone SSHL is characterized by high-frequency (4,000, 8,000 Hz) hearing loss and preservation of low-, middle-fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Psillas, George, Rizou, Aikaterini, Rachovitsas, Dimitrios, Tsiropoulos, Gabriel, Constantinidis, Jiannis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1657789
_version_ 1783387111513128960
author Psillas, George
Rizou, Aikaterini
Rachovitsas, Dimitrios
Tsiropoulos, Gabriel
Constantinidis, Jiannis
author_facet Psillas, George
Rizou, Aikaterini
Rachovitsas, Dimitrios
Tsiropoulos, Gabriel
Constantinidis, Jiannis
author_sort Psillas, George
collection PubMed
description Introduction  Low-tone sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is a well-recognized disease, in which the hearing loss is restricted to low frequencies. In contrast to low-tone SSHL, high-tone SSHL is characterized by high-frequency (4,000, 8,000 Hz) hearing loss and preservation of low-, middle-frequency hearing. Objective  The objective of this study is to compare the hearing recovery and long-term outcome of low-tone SSHL with those of patients affected by high-tone SSHL in a follow-up of ∼ 3 years. Methods  The low-tone SSHL and high-tone SSHL groups included 27 and 20 patients, respectively; the patients of both groups were treated with intravenous steroids. Predictive factors (gender, affected side, delay of treatment, follow-up time) were also examined. Results  Overall, complete hearing recovery was observed in 77.7% of the patients in the low-tone SSHL group and in 15% of the patients in the high-tone SSHL group. In the high-tone SSHL group, a higher proportion of patients reported tinnitus compared with the low-tone SSHL group (13 cases [65%] versus 3 cases [11%]); however, recurrences were more common in the low-tone SSHL (22%, 6 patients) compared with the high-tone SSHL (2 cases [10%]) group. No predictive factor was found to statistically impact on hearing outcome. Conclusion  After initial therapy, the low-tone SSHL patients have more favorable hearing outcome than high-tone SSHL patients. However, recurrences occurred more frequently in the low-tone SSHL group, while the high-tone SSHL group was more often accompanied by residual symptoms, such as tinnitus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6331312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63313122019-01-15 Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Psillas, George Rizou, Aikaterini Rachovitsas, Dimitrios Tsiropoulos, Gabriel Constantinidis, Jiannis Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction  Low-tone sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is a well-recognized disease, in which the hearing loss is restricted to low frequencies. In contrast to low-tone SSHL, high-tone SSHL is characterized by high-frequency (4,000, 8,000 Hz) hearing loss and preservation of low-, middle-frequency hearing. Objective  The objective of this study is to compare the hearing recovery and long-term outcome of low-tone SSHL with those of patients affected by high-tone SSHL in a follow-up of ∼ 3 years. Methods  The low-tone SSHL and high-tone SSHL groups included 27 and 20 patients, respectively; the patients of both groups were treated with intravenous steroids. Predictive factors (gender, affected side, delay of treatment, follow-up time) were also examined. Results  Overall, complete hearing recovery was observed in 77.7% of the patients in the low-tone SSHL group and in 15% of the patients in the high-tone SSHL group. In the high-tone SSHL group, a higher proportion of patients reported tinnitus compared with the low-tone SSHL group (13 cases [65%] versus 3 cases [11%]); however, recurrences were more common in the low-tone SSHL (22%, 6 patients) compared with the high-tone SSHL (2 cases [10%]) group. No predictive factor was found to statistically impact on hearing outcome. Conclusion  After initial therapy, the low-tone SSHL patients have more favorable hearing outcome than high-tone SSHL patients. However, recurrences occurred more frequently in the low-tone SSHL group, while the high-tone SSHL group was more often accompanied by residual symptoms, such as tinnitus. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2019-01 2018-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6331312/ /pubmed/30647786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1657789 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Psillas, George
Rizou, Aikaterini
Rachovitsas, Dimitrios
Tsiropoulos, Gabriel
Constantinidis, Jiannis
Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
title Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
title_full Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
title_fullStr Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
title_full_unstemmed Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
title_short Hearing Outcome of Low-tone Compared to High-tone Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
title_sort hearing outcome of low-tone compared to high-tone sudden sensorineural hearing loss
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1657789
work_keys_str_mv AT psillasgeorge hearingoutcomeoflowtonecomparedtohightonesuddensensorineuralhearingloss
AT rizouaikaterini hearingoutcomeoflowtonecomparedtohightonesuddensensorineuralhearingloss
AT rachovitsasdimitrios hearingoutcomeoflowtonecomparedtohightonesuddensensorineuralhearingloss
AT tsiropoulosgabriel hearingoutcomeoflowtonecomparedtohightonesuddensensorineuralhearingloss
AT constantinidisjiannis hearingoutcomeoflowtonecomparedtohightonesuddensensorineuralhearingloss