Cargando…

Immunochemical detection of mycotoxins in donkey milk

The applicability of enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for aflatoxin M(1) (AFM(1)), ochratoxin A (OTA) and zearalenone (ZEN) to analyse these toxins in donkey milk (Equus asinus) was studied. For AFM(1) and OTA analysis, milk could be analysed by EIA without sample pretreatment. For ZEN, heat treatment at 7...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gross, Madeleine, Ploetz, Christian Puck, Gottschalk, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30343381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12550-018-0333-2
_version_ 1783387144218214400
author Gross, Madeleine
Ploetz, Christian Puck
Gottschalk, Christoph
author_facet Gross, Madeleine
Ploetz, Christian Puck
Gottschalk, Christoph
author_sort Gross, Madeleine
collection PubMed
description The applicability of enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for aflatoxin M(1) (AFM(1)), ochratoxin A (OTA) and zearalenone (ZEN) to analyse these toxins in donkey milk (Equus asinus) was studied. For AFM(1) and OTA analysis, milk could be analysed by EIA without sample pretreatment. For ZEN, heat treatment at 78 °C for 30 min prior EIA analysis was required to avoid false positives. To include detection of phase II metabolites of ZEN, samples were additionally treated with glucuronidase/sulfatase for this EIA. Detection limits were 5 ng/kg (AFM(1)), 9 ng/kg (OTA) and 600 ng/kg (ZEN). All donkey milk samples were negative for all three toxins. Satisfactory quantitation was achieved for spiked samples. Analysis of some cereal-containing donkey feed components (pellets, oats) by EIA revealed absence of aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1), < 3 μg/kg) and OTA (< 4 μg/kg), while ZEN was found in pellets (180 μg/kg) and in oats (7 μg/kg). This is the first one study on multitoxin determination in donkey milk by antibody-based test systems. In general, the results confirm that EIAs are convenient tools for mycotoxin detection in donkey milk. However, false-positive results may occur, possibly due to the high lysozyme content of donkey milk, which may exert inhibitory activity in some competitive EIA systems. Therefore, specific validation of each EIA for this specific matrix is required, and re-analysis after heat treatment of EIA-positive donkey milk is highly recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6331496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63314962019-01-27 Immunochemical detection of mycotoxins in donkey milk Gross, Madeleine Ploetz, Christian Puck Gottschalk, Christoph Mycotoxin Res Original Article The applicability of enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for aflatoxin M(1) (AFM(1)), ochratoxin A (OTA) and zearalenone (ZEN) to analyse these toxins in donkey milk (Equus asinus) was studied. For AFM(1) and OTA analysis, milk could be analysed by EIA without sample pretreatment. For ZEN, heat treatment at 78 °C for 30 min prior EIA analysis was required to avoid false positives. To include detection of phase II metabolites of ZEN, samples were additionally treated with glucuronidase/sulfatase for this EIA. Detection limits were 5 ng/kg (AFM(1)), 9 ng/kg (OTA) and 600 ng/kg (ZEN). All donkey milk samples were negative for all three toxins. Satisfactory quantitation was achieved for spiked samples. Analysis of some cereal-containing donkey feed components (pellets, oats) by EIA revealed absence of aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1), < 3 μg/kg) and OTA (< 4 μg/kg), while ZEN was found in pellets (180 μg/kg) and in oats (7 μg/kg). This is the first one study on multitoxin determination in donkey milk by antibody-based test systems. In general, the results confirm that EIAs are convenient tools for mycotoxin detection in donkey milk. However, false-positive results may occur, possibly due to the high lysozyme content of donkey milk, which may exert inhibitory activity in some competitive EIA systems. Therefore, specific validation of each EIA for this specific matrix is required, and re-analysis after heat treatment of EIA-positive donkey milk is highly recommended. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-10-20 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6331496/ /pubmed/30343381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12550-018-0333-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gross, Madeleine
Ploetz, Christian Puck
Gottschalk, Christoph
Immunochemical detection of mycotoxins in donkey milk
title Immunochemical detection of mycotoxins in donkey milk
title_full Immunochemical detection of mycotoxins in donkey milk
title_fullStr Immunochemical detection of mycotoxins in donkey milk
title_full_unstemmed Immunochemical detection of mycotoxins in donkey milk
title_short Immunochemical detection of mycotoxins in donkey milk
title_sort immunochemical detection of mycotoxins in donkey milk
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30343381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12550-018-0333-2
work_keys_str_mv AT grossmadeleine immunochemicaldetectionofmycotoxinsindonkeymilk
AT ploetzchristianpuck immunochemicaldetectionofmycotoxinsindonkeymilk
AT gottschalkchristoph immunochemicaldetectionofmycotoxinsindonkeymilk