Cargando…

Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Plain abdominal radiography (PAR) is routinely performed in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to (1) identify the indications for PAR in EDs and compare them against international guidelines, (2) uncover predictors of non-compliance with guidelines, and (3) describe the use o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertin, Christophe L., Ponthus, Simon, Vivekanantham, Hari, Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre, Kherad, Omar, Rutschmann, Olivier T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3870-2
_version_ 1783387368443609088
author Bertin, Christophe L.
Ponthus, Simon
Vivekanantham, Hari
Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre
Kherad, Omar
Rutschmann, Olivier T.
author_facet Bertin, Christophe L.
Ponthus, Simon
Vivekanantham, Hari
Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre
Kherad, Omar
Rutschmann, Olivier T.
author_sort Bertin, Christophe L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Plain abdominal radiography (PAR) is routinely performed in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to (1) identify the indications for PAR in EDs and compare them against international guidelines, (2) uncover predictors of non-compliance with guidelines, and (3) describe the use of additional radiological examinations in EDs. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in the EDs of two hospitals in Geneva, Switzerland, including all adult patients who underwent PAR in the EDs. Indications were considered “appropriate” if complying with guidelines. Predictors of non-compliance were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Over 1 year, PAR was performed in 1997 patients (2.2% of all admissions). Their mean age was 59.7 years, with 53.1% of female patients. The most common indications were constipation (30.8%), suspected ileus (28.9%), and abdominal pain (15.3%). According to the French and American guidelines, only 11.8% of the PARs were indicated, while 46.2% of them complied with the Australian and British guidelines. On multivariate analysis, admission to the private hospital ED (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% CI 1.78–8.45), female gender (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.46–2.59), and an age >  65 years (OR 2.41, 95%CI 1.74–3.32) were associated with a higher risk of inappropriate PAR. Additional radiological examinations were performed in 73.7% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most indications for PAR did not comply with guidelines and elderly women appeared particularly at risk of being exposed to inappropriate examination. PAR did not prevent the need for additional examinations. Local guidelines should be developed, and initiatives should be implemented to reduce unnecessary PARs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02980081.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6332516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63325162019-01-16 Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study Bertin, Christophe L. Ponthus, Simon Vivekanantham, Hari Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre Kherad, Omar Rutschmann, Olivier T. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Plain abdominal radiography (PAR) is routinely performed in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to (1) identify the indications for PAR in EDs and compare them against international guidelines, (2) uncover predictors of non-compliance with guidelines, and (3) describe the use of additional radiological examinations in EDs. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in the EDs of two hospitals in Geneva, Switzerland, including all adult patients who underwent PAR in the EDs. Indications were considered “appropriate” if complying with guidelines. Predictors of non-compliance were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Over 1 year, PAR was performed in 1997 patients (2.2% of all admissions). Their mean age was 59.7 years, with 53.1% of female patients. The most common indications were constipation (30.8%), suspected ileus (28.9%), and abdominal pain (15.3%). According to the French and American guidelines, only 11.8% of the PARs were indicated, while 46.2% of them complied with the Australian and British guidelines. On multivariate analysis, admission to the private hospital ED (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% CI 1.78–8.45), female gender (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.46–2.59), and an age >  65 years (OR 2.41, 95%CI 1.74–3.32) were associated with a higher risk of inappropriate PAR. Additional radiological examinations were performed in 73.7% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most indications for PAR did not comply with guidelines and elderly women appeared particularly at risk of being exposed to inappropriate examination. PAR did not prevent the need for additional examinations. Local guidelines should be developed, and initiatives should be implemented to reduce unnecessary PARs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02980081. BioMed Central 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6332516/ /pubmed/30642302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3870-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bertin, Christophe L.
Ponthus, Simon
Vivekanantham, Hari
Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre
Kherad, Omar
Rutschmann, Olivier T.
Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
title Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3870-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bertinchristophel overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ponthussimon overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vivekananthamhari overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT polettipierrealexandre overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kheradomar overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT rutschmannoliviert overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy