Cargando…

Outcomes used in randomised controlled trials of nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: No evidence exists to date on which to base the selection of outcome measures for assessing nutritional interventions in critically ill patients. We conducted a systematic literature review to describe the outcomes used in recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing nutritional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taverny, Garry, Lescot, Thomas, Pardo, Emmanuel, Thonon, Frederique, Maarouf, Manar, Alberti, Corinne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2303-7
_version_ 1783387386000965632
author Taverny, Garry
Lescot, Thomas
Pardo, Emmanuel
Thonon, Frederique
Maarouf, Manar
Alberti, Corinne
author_facet Taverny, Garry
Lescot, Thomas
Pardo, Emmanuel
Thonon, Frederique
Maarouf, Manar
Alberti, Corinne
author_sort Taverny, Garry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No evidence exists to date on which to base the selection of outcome measures for assessing nutritional interventions in critically ill patients. We conducted a systematic literature review to describe the outcomes used in recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing nutritional interventions in critically ill patients. Our objective was to set the foundation for the development of a core set of outcome measures for use in future RCTs. METHODS: We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for RCTs of nutritional interventions in critically ill patients aged 18 years or older, published and/or registered between January 2000 and August 2018. Outcomes were divided into six categories (mortality, length of stay, duration of organ dysfunction, complications, functional outcomes, and others) and analysed according to the study characteristics and publication year. RESULTS: Of the 885 references retrieved, 170 were included in the review. Of these, 136 (80%) defined a primary outcome, 114 (67%) defined secondary outcomes (two per study on average), and 34 (20%) did not specify whether outcomes were primary or secondary. We identified 24 different outcomes in all, of which 19 were primary. Complications were the most widely used primary outcome (65/136, 48%). Mortality was the primary outcome in 17/136 (13%) studies, with six different timepoints. The main secondary outcomes were length of stay (90/114, 79%), mortality (82/114, 72%), and duration of organ dysfunction (75/114, 65%). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the heterogeneity of outcomes used in recent randomized controlled trials evaluating nutritional interventions in critically ill patients. The results of our systematic review may have implications for designing future RCTs of nutritional interventions in the ICU. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2303-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6332589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63325892019-01-16 Outcomes used in randomised controlled trials of nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review Taverny, Garry Lescot, Thomas Pardo, Emmanuel Thonon, Frederique Maarouf, Manar Alberti, Corinne Crit Care Research Article BACKGROUND: No evidence exists to date on which to base the selection of outcome measures for assessing nutritional interventions in critically ill patients. We conducted a systematic literature review to describe the outcomes used in recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing nutritional interventions in critically ill patients. Our objective was to set the foundation for the development of a core set of outcome measures for use in future RCTs. METHODS: We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for RCTs of nutritional interventions in critically ill patients aged 18 years or older, published and/or registered between January 2000 and August 2018. Outcomes were divided into six categories (mortality, length of stay, duration of organ dysfunction, complications, functional outcomes, and others) and analysed according to the study characteristics and publication year. RESULTS: Of the 885 references retrieved, 170 were included in the review. Of these, 136 (80%) defined a primary outcome, 114 (67%) defined secondary outcomes (two per study on average), and 34 (20%) did not specify whether outcomes were primary or secondary. We identified 24 different outcomes in all, of which 19 were primary. Complications were the most widely used primary outcome (65/136, 48%). Mortality was the primary outcome in 17/136 (13%) studies, with six different timepoints. The main secondary outcomes were length of stay (90/114, 79%), mortality (82/114, 72%), and duration of organ dysfunction (75/114, 65%). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the heterogeneity of outcomes used in recent randomized controlled trials evaluating nutritional interventions in critically ill patients. The results of our systematic review may have implications for designing future RCTs of nutritional interventions in the ICU. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2303-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6332589/ /pubmed/30642377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2303-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Taverny, Garry
Lescot, Thomas
Pardo, Emmanuel
Thonon, Frederique
Maarouf, Manar
Alberti, Corinne
Outcomes used in randomised controlled trials of nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review
title Outcomes used in randomised controlled trials of nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review
title_full Outcomes used in randomised controlled trials of nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review
title_fullStr Outcomes used in randomised controlled trials of nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes used in randomised controlled trials of nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review
title_short Outcomes used in randomised controlled trials of nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review
title_sort outcomes used in randomised controlled trials of nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2303-7
work_keys_str_mv AT tavernygarry outcomesusedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofnutritioninthecriticallyillasystematicreview
AT lescotthomas outcomesusedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofnutritioninthecriticallyillasystematicreview
AT pardoemmanuel outcomesusedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofnutritioninthecriticallyillasystematicreview
AT thononfrederique outcomesusedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofnutritioninthecriticallyillasystematicreview
AT maaroufmanar outcomesusedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofnutritioninthecriticallyillasystematicreview
AT alberticorinne outcomesusedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofnutritioninthecriticallyillasystematicreview