Cargando…
Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research
BACKGROUND: Currently, thanks to the growing number of public database resources, most evidence on planning and management, healthcare institutions, policies and practices is becoming available to everyone. However, one of the limitations for the advancement of data and literature-driven research ha...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0404-z |
_version_ | 1783387399592607744 |
---|---|
author | Martínez-García, Mireya Vallejo, Maite Hernández-Lemus, Enrique Álvarez-Díaz, Jorge Alberto |
author_facet | Martínez-García, Mireya Vallejo, Maite Hernández-Lemus, Enrique Álvarez-Díaz, Jorge Alberto |
author_sort | Martínez-García, Mireya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Currently, thanks to the growing number of public database resources, most evidence on planning and management, healthcare institutions, policies and practices is becoming available to everyone. However, one of the limitations for the advancement of data and literature-driven research has been the lack of flexibility of the methodological resources used in qualitative research. There is a need to incorporate friendly, cheaper and faster tools for the systematic, unbiased analysis of large data corpora, in particular regarding the qualitative aspects of the information (often overlooked). METHODS: This article proposes a series of novel techniques, exemplified by the case of the role of Institutional Committees of Bioethics to (1) massively identify the documents relevant to a given issue, (2) extract the fundamental content, focusing on qualitative analysis, (3) synthesize the findings in the published literature, (4) categorize and visualize the evidence, and (5) analyse and report the results. RESULTS: A critical study of the institutional role of public health policies and practices in Institutional Committees of Bioethics was used as an example application of the method. Interactive strategies were helpful to define and conceptualise variables, propose research questions and refine research interpretation. These methods are additional aids to systematic reviews, pre-coding schemes and construction of a priori diagrams to survey and analyse social science literature. CONCLUSIONS: These novel methods have proven to facilitate the formulation and testing of hypotheses on the subjects to be studied. Such tools may allow important advances going from descriptive approaches to decision-making and even institutional assessment and policy redesign, by pragmatic reason of time and costs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0404-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6332644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63326442019-01-16 Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research Martínez-García, Mireya Vallejo, Maite Hernández-Lemus, Enrique Álvarez-Díaz, Jorge Alberto Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Currently, thanks to the growing number of public database resources, most evidence on planning and management, healthcare institutions, policies and practices is becoming available to everyone. However, one of the limitations for the advancement of data and literature-driven research has been the lack of flexibility of the methodological resources used in qualitative research. There is a need to incorporate friendly, cheaper and faster tools for the systematic, unbiased analysis of large data corpora, in particular regarding the qualitative aspects of the information (often overlooked). METHODS: This article proposes a series of novel techniques, exemplified by the case of the role of Institutional Committees of Bioethics to (1) massively identify the documents relevant to a given issue, (2) extract the fundamental content, focusing on qualitative analysis, (3) synthesize the findings in the published literature, (4) categorize and visualize the evidence, and (5) analyse and report the results. RESULTS: A critical study of the institutional role of public health policies and practices in Institutional Committees of Bioethics was used as an example application of the method. Interactive strategies were helpful to define and conceptualise variables, propose research questions and refine research interpretation. These methods are additional aids to systematic reviews, pre-coding schemes and construction of a priori diagrams to survey and analyse social science literature. CONCLUSIONS: These novel methods have proven to facilitate the formulation and testing of hypotheses on the subjects to be studied. Such tools may allow important advances going from descriptive approaches to decision-making and even institutional assessment and policy redesign, by pragmatic reason of time and costs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0404-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6332644/ /pubmed/30642358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0404-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Martínez-García, Mireya Vallejo, Maite Hernández-Lemus, Enrique Álvarez-Díaz, Jorge Alberto Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research |
title | Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research |
title_full | Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research |
title_fullStr | Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research |
title_short | Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research |
title_sort | novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0404-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinezgarciamireya novelmethodsofqualitativeanalysisforhealthpolicyresearch AT vallejomaite novelmethodsofqualitativeanalysisforhealthpolicyresearch AT hernandezlemusenrique novelmethodsofqualitativeanalysisforhealthpolicyresearch AT alvarezdiazjorgealberto novelmethodsofqualitativeanalysisforhealthpolicyresearch |