Cargando…

Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research

BACKGROUND: Currently, thanks to the growing number of public database resources, most evidence on planning and management, healthcare institutions, policies and practices is becoming available to everyone. However, one of the limitations for the advancement of data and literature-driven research ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martínez-García, Mireya, Vallejo, Maite, Hernández-Lemus, Enrique, Álvarez-Díaz, Jorge Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0404-z
_version_ 1783387399592607744
author Martínez-García, Mireya
Vallejo, Maite
Hernández-Lemus, Enrique
Álvarez-Díaz, Jorge Alberto
author_facet Martínez-García, Mireya
Vallejo, Maite
Hernández-Lemus, Enrique
Álvarez-Díaz, Jorge Alberto
author_sort Martínez-García, Mireya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, thanks to the growing number of public database resources, most evidence on planning and management, healthcare institutions, policies and practices is becoming available to everyone. However, one of the limitations for the advancement of data and literature-driven research has been the lack of flexibility of the methodological resources used in qualitative research. There is a need to incorporate friendly, cheaper and faster tools for the systematic, unbiased analysis of large data corpora, in particular regarding the qualitative aspects of the information (often overlooked). METHODS: This article proposes a series of novel techniques, exemplified by the case of the role of Institutional Committees of Bioethics to (1) massively identify the documents relevant to a given issue, (2) extract the fundamental content, focusing on qualitative analysis, (3) synthesize the findings in the published literature, (4) categorize and visualize the evidence, and (5) analyse and report the results. RESULTS: A critical study of the institutional role of public health policies and practices in Institutional Committees of Bioethics was used as an example application of the method. Interactive strategies were helpful to define and conceptualise variables, propose research questions and refine research interpretation. These methods are additional aids to systematic reviews, pre-coding schemes and construction of a priori diagrams to survey and analyse social science literature. CONCLUSIONS: These novel methods have proven to facilitate the formulation and testing of hypotheses on the subjects to be studied. Such tools may allow important advances going from descriptive approaches to decision-making and even institutional assessment and policy redesign, by pragmatic reason of time and costs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0404-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6332644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63326442019-01-16 Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research Martínez-García, Mireya Vallejo, Maite Hernández-Lemus, Enrique Álvarez-Díaz, Jorge Alberto Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Currently, thanks to the growing number of public database resources, most evidence on planning and management, healthcare institutions, policies and practices is becoming available to everyone. However, one of the limitations for the advancement of data and literature-driven research has been the lack of flexibility of the methodological resources used in qualitative research. There is a need to incorporate friendly, cheaper and faster tools for the systematic, unbiased analysis of large data corpora, in particular regarding the qualitative aspects of the information (often overlooked). METHODS: This article proposes a series of novel techniques, exemplified by the case of the role of Institutional Committees of Bioethics to (1) massively identify the documents relevant to a given issue, (2) extract the fundamental content, focusing on qualitative analysis, (3) synthesize the findings in the published literature, (4) categorize and visualize the evidence, and (5) analyse and report the results. RESULTS: A critical study of the institutional role of public health policies and practices in Institutional Committees of Bioethics was used as an example application of the method. Interactive strategies were helpful to define and conceptualise variables, propose research questions and refine research interpretation. These methods are additional aids to systematic reviews, pre-coding schemes and construction of a priori diagrams to survey and analyse social science literature. CONCLUSIONS: These novel methods have proven to facilitate the formulation and testing of hypotheses on the subjects to be studied. Such tools may allow important advances going from descriptive approaches to decision-making and even institutional assessment and policy redesign, by pragmatic reason of time and costs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0404-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6332644/ /pubmed/30642358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0404-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Martínez-García, Mireya
Vallejo, Maite
Hernández-Lemus, Enrique
Álvarez-Díaz, Jorge Alberto
Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research
title Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research
title_full Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research
title_fullStr Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research
title_full_unstemmed Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research
title_short Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research
title_sort novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0404-z
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezgarciamireya novelmethodsofqualitativeanalysisforhealthpolicyresearch
AT vallejomaite novelmethodsofqualitativeanalysisforhealthpolicyresearch
AT hernandezlemusenrique novelmethodsofqualitativeanalysisforhealthpolicyresearch
AT alvarezdiazjorgealberto novelmethodsofqualitativeanalysisforhealthpolicyresearch