Cargando…

Malignant benign hematology

When faced with a life‐threatening non‐cancerous blood disorder, the term “benign” is a misnomer. Devastating diseases like catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, acquired hemophilia, and severe immune thrombocytopenia present a challenge to the hematologist. They are often difficult to tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sholzberg, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12170
_version_ 1783387422796546048
author Sholzberg, Michelle
author_facet Sholzberg, Michelle
author_sort Sholzberg, Michelle
collection PubMed
description When faced with a life‐threatening non‐cancerous blood disorder, the term “benign” is a misnomer. Devastating diseases like catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, acquired hemophilia, and severe immune thrombocytopenia present a challenge to the hematologist. They are often difficult to treat and lack appropriately powered, unbiased evidence to support management. Moreover, the label “benign” does a disservice as it subconsciously triggers discrepancies in prioritization for the care provider, the system, the patient and his/her family. Despite our progressive advances in non‐malignant hematology, there remain many knowledge and care gaps that can be effectively addressed by more international collaboration, more clinical and research infrastructure and more expertly trained clinicians. To highlight the need, is it time to reconsider the term “benign” hematology?
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6332750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63327502019-01-17 Malignant benign hematology Sholzberg, Michelle Res Pract Thromb Haemost Forum When faced with a life‐threatening non‐cancerous blood disorder, the term “benign” is a misnomer. Devastating diseases like catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, acquired hemophilia, and severe immune thrombocytopenia present a challenge to the hematologist. They are often difficult to treat and lack appropriately powered, unbiased evidence to support management. Moreover, the label “benign” does a disservice as it subconsciously triggers discrepancies in prioritization for the care provider, the system, the patient and his/her family. Despite our progressive advances in non‐malignant hematology, there remain many knowledge and care gaps that can be effectively addressed by more international collaboration, more clinical and research infrastructure and more expertly trained clinicians. To highlight the need, is it time to reconsider the term “benign” hematology? John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6332750/ /pubmed/30656271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12170 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Forum
Sholzberg, Michelle
Malignant benign hematology
title Malignant benign hematology
title_full Malignant benign hematology
title_fullStr Malignant benign hematology
title_full_unstemmed Malignant benign hematology
title_short Malignant benign hematology
title_sort malignant benign hematology
topic Forum
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12170
work_keys_str_mv AT sholzbergmichelle malignantbenignhematology