Cargando…

Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can be used to accurately detect fetal chromosomal anomalies early in pregnancy by assessing cell-free fetal DNA present in maternal blood. The rapid diffusion of NIPT, as well as the ease and simplicity of the test raises concerns around informed dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cernat, Alexandra, De Freitas, Chante, Majid, Umair, Trivedi, Forum, Higgins, Caroline, Vanstone, Meredith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2168-4
_version_ 1783387454953226240
author Cernat, Alexandra
De Freitas, Chante
Majid, Umair
Trivedi, Forum
Higgins, Caroline
Vanstone, Meredith
author_facet Cernat, Alexandra
De Freitas, Chante
Majid, Umair
Trivedi, Forum
Higgins, Caroline
Vanstone, Meredith
author_sort Cernat, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can be used to accurately detect fetal chromosomal anomalies early in pregnancy by assessing cell-free fetal DNA present in maternal blood. The rapid diffusion of NIPT, as well as the ease and simplicity of the test raises concerns around informed decision-making and the potential for routinization. Introducing NIPT in a way that facilitates informed and autonomous decisions is imperative to the ethical application of this technology. We approach this imperative by systematically reviewing and synthesizing primary qualitative research on women’s experiences with and preferences for informed decision-making around NIPT. METHODS: We searched multiple bibliographic databases including Ovid MEDLINE, EBSCO Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and ISI Web of Science Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Our review was guided by integrative qualitative meta-synthesis, and we used a staged coding process similar to that of grounded theory to conduct our analysis. RESULTS: Thirty empirical primary qualitative research studies were eligible for inclusion. Women preferred to learn about NIPT from their clinicians, but they expressed dissatisfaction with the quality and quantity of information provided during counselling and often sought information from a variety of other sources. Women generally had a good understanding of test characteristics, and the factors of accuracy, physical risk, and test timing were the critical information elements that they used to make informed decisions around NIPT. Women often described NIPT as easy or just another blood test, highlighting threats to informed decision-making such as routinization or a pressure to test. CONCLUSIONS: Women’s unique circumstances modulate the information that they value and require most in the context of making an informed decision. Widened availability of trustworthy information about NIPT as well as careful attention to the facilitation of counselling may help facilitate informed decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018086261. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2168-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6332899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63328992019-01-23 Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences Cernat, Alexandra De Freitas, Chante Majid, Umair Trivedi, Forum Higgins, Caroline Vanstone, Meredith BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can be used to accurately detect fetal chromosomal anomalies early in pregnancy by assessing cell-free fetal DNA present in maternal blood. The rapid diffusion of NIPT, as well as the ease and simplicity of the test raises concerns around informed decision-making and the potential for routinization. Introducing NIPT in a way that facilitates informed and autonomous decisions is imperative to the ethical application of this technology. We approach this imperative by systematically reviewing and synthesizing primary qualitative research on women’s experiences with and preferences for informed decision-making around NIPT. METHODS: We searched multiple bibliographic databases including Ovid MEDLINE, EBSCO Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and ISI Web of Science Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Our review was guided by integrative qualitative meta-synthesis, and we used a staged coding process similar to that of grounded theory to conduct our analysis. RESULTS: Thirty empirical primary qualitative research studies were eligible for inclusion. Women preferred to learn about NIPT from their clinicians, but they expressed dissatisfaction with the quality and quantity of information provided during counselling and often sought information from a variety of other sources. Women generally had a good understanding of test characteristics, and the factors of accuracy, physical risk, and test timing were the critical information elements that they used to make informed decisions around NIPT. Women often described NIPT as easy or just another blood test, highlighting threats to informed decision-making such as routinization or a pressure to test. CONCLUSIONS: Women’s unique circumstances modulate the information that they value and require most in the context of making an informed decision. Widened availability of trustworthy information about NIPT as well as careful attention to the facilitation of counselling may help facilitate informed decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018086261. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2168-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6332899/ /pubmed/30642270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2168-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cernat, Alexandra
De Freitas, Chante
Majid, Umair
Trivedi, Forum
Higgins, Caroline
Vanstone, Meredith
Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
title Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
title_full Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
title_fullStr Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
title_full_unstemmed Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
title_short Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
title_sort facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (nipt): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2168-4
work_keys_str_mv AT cernatalexandra facilitatinginformedchoiceaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesisofwomensexperiences
AT defreitaschante facilitatinginformedchoiceaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesisofwomensexperiences
AT majidumair facilitatinginformedchoiceaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesisofwomensexperiences
AT trivediforum facilitatinginformedchoiceaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesisofwomensexperiences
AT higginscaroline facilitatinginformedchoiceaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesisofwomensexperiences
AT vanstonemeredith facilitatinginformedchoiceaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptasystematicreviewandqualitativemetasynthesisofwomensexperiences