Cargando…

A qualitative study of cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Check using different risk calculators: protocol for the RIsk COmmunication in NHS Health Check (RICO) study

BACKGROUND: NHS Health Check is a national cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment programme for 40–74 year olds in England, in which practitioners should assess and communicate CVD risk, supported by appropriate risk-management advice and goal-setting. This requires effective communication, to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gidlow, Christopher J., Ellis, Naomi J., Cowap, Lisa, Riley, Victoria, Crone, Diane, Cottrell, Elizabeth, Grogan, Sarah, Chambers, Ruth, Clark-Carter, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0897-0
_version_ 1783387458086371328
author Gidlow, Christopher J.
Ellis, Naomi J.
Cowap, Lisa
Riley, Victoria
Crone, Diane
Cottrell, Elizabeth
Grogan, Sarah
Chambers, Ruth
Clark-Carter, David
author_facet Gidlow, Christopher J.
Ellis, Naomi J.
Cowap, Lisa
Riley, Victoria
Crone, Diane
Cottrell, Elizabeth
Grogan, Sarah
Chambers, Ruth
Clark-Carter, David
author_sort Gidlow, Christopher J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: NHS Health Check is a national cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment programme for 40–74 year olds in England, in which practitioners should assess and communicate CVD risk, supported by appropriate risk-management advice and goal-setting. This requires effective communication, to equip patients with knowledge and intention to act. Currently, the QRISK®2 10-year CVD risk score is most common way in which CVD risk is estimated. Newer tools, such as JBS3, allow manipulation of risk factors and can demonstrate the impact of positive actions. However, the use, and relative value, of these tools within CVD risk communication is unknown. We will explore practitioner and patient CVD risk perceptions when using QRISK®2 or JBS3, the associated advice or treatment offered by the practitioner, and patients’ responses. METHODS: RIsk COmmunication in NHS Health Check (RICO) is a qualitative study with quantitative process evaluation. Twelve general practices in the West Midlands of England will be randomised to one of two groups: usual practice, in which practitioners use QRISK®2 to assess and communicate CVD risk; intervention, in which practitioners use JBS3. Twenty Health Checks per practice will be video-recorded (n = 240, 120 per group), with patients stratified by age, gender and ethnicity. Post-Health Check, video-stimulated recall (VSR) interviews will be conducted with 48 patients (n = 24 per group) and all practitioners (n = 12–18), using video excerpts to enhance participant recall/reflection. Patient medical record reviews will detect health-protective actions in the first 12-weeks following a Health Check (e.g., lifestyle referrals, statin prescription). Risk communication, patient response and intentions for health-protective behaviours in each group will be explored through thematic analysis of video-recorded Health Checks (using Protection Motivation Theory as a framework) and VSR interviews. Process evaluation will include between-group comparisons of quantitatively coded Health Check content and post-Health Check patient outcomes. Finally, 10 patients with the most positive intentions or behaviours will be selected for case study analysis (using all data sources). DISCUSSION: This study will produce novel insights about the utility of QRISK®2 and JBS3 to promote patient and practitioner understanding and perception of CVD risk and associated implications for patient intentions with respect to health-protective behaviours (and underlying mechanisms). Recommendations for practice will be developed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN10443908. Registered 7th February 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0897-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6332912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63329122019-01-23 A qualitative study of cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Check using different risk calculators: protocol for the RIsk COmmunication in NHS Health Check (RICO) study Gidlow, Christopher J. Ellis, Naomi J. Cowap, Lisa Riley, Victoria Crone, Diane Cottrell, Elizabeth Grogan, Sarah Chambers, Ruth Clark-Carter, David BMC Fam Pract Study Protocol BACKGROUND: NHS Health Check is a national cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment programme for 40–74 year olds in England, in which practitioners should assess and communicate CVD risk, supported by appropriate risk-management advice and goal-setting. This requires effective communication, to equip patients with knowledge and intention to act. Currently, the QRISK®2 10-year CVD risk score is most common way in which CVD risk is estimated. Newer tools, such as JBS3, allow manipulation of risk factors and can demonstrate the impact of positive actions. However, the use, and relative value, of these tools within CVD risk communication is unknown. We will explore practitioner and patient CVD risk perceptions when using QRISK®2 or JBS3, the associated advice or treatment offered by the practitioner, and patients’ responses. METHODS: RIsk COmmunication in NHS Health Check (RICO) is a qualitative study with quantitative process evaluation. Twelve general practices in the West Midlands of England will be randomised to one of two groups: usual practice, in which practitioners use QRISK®2 to assess and communicate CVD risk; intervention, in which practitioners use JBS3. Twenty Health Checks per practice will be video-recorded (n = 240, 120 per group), with patients stratified by age, gender and ethnicity. Post-Health Check, video-stimulated recall (VSR) interviews will be conducted with 48 patients (n = 24 per group) and all practitioners (n = 12–18), using video excerpts to enhance participant recall/reflection. Patient medical record reviews will detect health-protective actions in the first 12-weeks following a Health Check (e.g., lifestyle referrals, statin prescription). Risk communication, patient response and intentions for health-protective behaviours in each group will be explored through thematic analysis of video-recorded Health Checks (using Protection Motivation Theory as a framework) and VSR interviews. Process evaluation will include between-group comparisons of quantitatively coded Health Check content and post-Health Check patient outcomes. Finally, 10 patients with the most positive intentions or behaviours will be selected for case study analysis (using all data sources). DISCUSSION: This study will produce novel insights about the utility of QRISK®2 and JBS3 to promote patient and practitioner understanding and perception of CVD risk and associated implications for patient intentions with respect to health-protective behaviours (and underlying mechanisms). Recommendations for practice will be developed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN10443908. Registered 7th February 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0897-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6332912/ /pubmed/30642267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0897-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Gidlow, Christopher J.
Ellis, Naomi J.
Cowap, Lisa
Riley, Victoria
Crone, Diane
Cottrell, Elizabeth
Grogan, Sarah
Chambers, Ruth
Clark-Carter, David
A qualitative study of cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Check using different risk calculators: protocol for the RIsk COmmunication in NHS Health Check (RICO) study
title A qualitative study of cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Check using different risk calculators: protocol for the RIsk COmmunication in NHS Health Check (RICO) study
title_full A qualitative study of cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Check using different risk calculators: protocol for the RIsk COmmunication in NHS Health Check (RICO) study
title_fullStr A qualitative study of cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Check using different risk calculators: protocol for the RIsk COmmunication in NHS Health Check (RICO) study
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study of cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Check using different risk calculators: protocol for the RIsk COmmunication in NHS Health Check (RICO) study
title_short A qualitative study of cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Check using different risk calculators: protocol for the RIsk COmmunication in NHS Health Check (RICO) study
title_sort qualitative study of cardiovascular disease risk communication in nhs health check using different risk calculators: protocol for the risk communication in nhs health check (rico) study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0897-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gidlowchristopherj aqualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT ellisnaomij aqualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT cowaplisa aqualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT rileyvictoria aqualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT cronediane aqualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT cottrellelizabeth aqualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT grogansarah aqualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT chambersruth aqualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT clarkcarterdavid aqualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT gidlowchristopherj qualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT ellisnaomij qualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT cowaplisa qualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT rileyvictoria qualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT cronediane qualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT cottrellelizabeth qualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT grogansarah qualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT chambersruth qualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy
AT clarkcarterdavid qualitativestudyofcardiovasculardiseaseriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckusingdifferentriskcalculatorsprotocolfortheriskcommunicationinnhshealthcheckricostudy