Cargando…

Citation Classics in Cone Beam Computed Tomography: The 100 Top-Cited Articles

AIM: The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize the 100 most cited articles on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive list of citation classics in CBCT was generated by searching the Scopus database without year or language restrictions. The top...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gondivkar, Shailesh M., Sarode, Sachin C., Gadbail, Amol R., Gondivkar, Rima S., Choudhary, Nilookumari, Patil, Shankargouda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9423281
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize the 100 most cited articles on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive list of citation classics in CBCT was generated by searching the Scopus database without year or language restrictions. The top 100 articles were retrieved after reading abstracts or full texts. The following study variables were evaluated: number of citations, citation density, journal name, impact factor, category and quartile of journals, publication year, authors with their affiliations, article type, and topics covered. RESULTS: The citation number ranged from 86 to 624, with a mean of 161.9 citations per article. The top 100 articles were distributed in 29 journals, and the journal with the most articles was Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (n=16). The articles were published between 1998 and 2012, and eight authors published more than 3 papers. The USA produced the most papers (n=38), followed by the UK (n=12). King's college London Dental Institute led the list of classics, with 8 articles. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first citation analysis to provide a detailed list of the most influential articles on CBCT and helps to recognize the quality of the works, discoveries, and trends steering the field.