Cargando…

The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis

BACKGROUND: While four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is extensively used in adults, reluctance remains to use 4DCT in children. Day‐to‐day (interfractional) variability and irregular respiration (intrafractional variability) have shown to be limiting factors of 4DCT effectiveness in adults....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huijskens, Sophie C., van Dijk, Irma W. E. M., Visser, Jorrit, Balgobind, Brian V., Rasch, Coen R. N., Alderliesten, Tanja, Bel, Arjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30414252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12488
_version_ 1783387503989882880
author Huijskens, Sophie C.
van Dijk, Irma W. E. M.
Visser, Jorrit
Balgobind, Brian V.
Rasch, Coen R. N.
Alderliesten, Tanja
Bel, Arjan
author_facet Huijskens, Sophie C.
van Dijk, Irma W. E. M.
Visser, Jorrit
Balgobind, Brian V.
Rasch, Coen R. N.
Alderliesten, Tanja
Bel, Arjan
author_sort Huijskens, Sophie C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is extensively used in adults, reluctance remains to use 4DCT in children. Day‐to‐day (interfractional) variability and irregular respiration (intrafractional variability) have shown to be limiting factors of 4DCT effectiveness in adults. In order to evaluate 4DCT applicability in children, the purpose of this study is to quantify inter‐ and intrafractional variability of respiratory motion in children and adults. The pooled analysis enables a solid comparison to reveal if 4DCT application for planning purposes in children could be valid. METHODS/MATERIALS: We retrospectively included 90 patients (45 children and 45 adults), for whom the diaphragm was visible on abdominal/thoracic free‐breathing cone beam CTs (480 pediatric, 524 adult CBCTs). For each CBCT, the cranial–caudal position of end‐exhale and end‐inhale positions of the right diaphragm dome were manually selected in the projection images. The difference in position between both phases defines the amplitude. Cycle time equaled inspiratory plus expiratory time. We analyzed the variability of the inter‐ and intrafractional respiratory‐induced diaphragm motion. RESULTS: Ranges of respiratory motion characteristics were large in both children and adults (amplitude: 4–17 vs 5–24 mm, cycle time 2.1–3.9 vs 2.7–6.5 s). The mean amplitude was slightly smaller in children than in adults (10.7 vs 12.3 mm; P = 0.06). Interfractional amplitude variability was statistically significantly smaller in children than in adults (1.4 vs 2.2 mm; P = 0.00). Mean cycle time was statistically significantly shorter in children (2.9 vs 3.6 s; P = 0.00). Additionally, intrafractional cycle time variability was statistically significantly smaller in children (0.5 vs 0.7 s; P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Overall variability is smaller in children than in adults, indicating that respiratory motion is more regular in children than in adults. This implies that a single pretreatment 4DCT could be a good representation of daily respiratory motion in children and will be at least equally beneficial for planning purposes as it is in adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6333119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63331192019-01-23 The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis Huijskens, Sophie C. van Dijk, Irma W. E. M. Visser, Jorrit Balgobind, Brian V. Rasch, Coen R. N. Alderliesten, Tanja Bel, Arjan J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging BACKGROUND: While four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is extensively used in adults, reluctance remains to use 4DCT in children. Day‐to‐day (interfractional) variability and irregular respiration (intrafractional variability) have shown to be limiting factors of 4DCT effectiveness in adults. In order to evaluate 4DCT applicability in children, the purpose of this study is to quantify inter‐ and intrafractional variability of respiratory motion in children and adults. The pooled analysis enables a solid comparison to reveal if 4DCT application for planning purposes in children could be valid. METHODS/MATERIALS: We retrospectively included 90 patients (45 children and 45 adults), for whom the diaphragm was visible on abdominal/thoracic free‐breathing cone beam CTs (480 pediatric, 524 adult CBCTs). For each CBCT, the cranial–caudal position of end‐exhale and end‐inhale positions of the right diaphragm dome were manually selected in the projection images. The difference in position between both phases defines the amplitude. Cycle time equaled inspiratory plus expiratory time. We analyzed the variability of the inter‐ and intrafractional respiratory‐induced diaphragm motion. RESULTS: Ranges of respiratory motion characteristics were large in both children and adults (amplitude: 4–17 vs 5–24 mm, cycle time 2.1–3.9 vs 2.7–6.5 s). The mean amplitude was slightly smaller in children than in adults (10.7 vs 12.3 mm; P = 0.06). Interfractional amplitude variability was statistically significantly smaller in children than in adults (1.4 vs 2.2 mm; P = 0.00). Mean cycle time was statistically significantly shorter in children (2.9 vs 3.6 s; P = 0.00). Additionally, intrafractional cycle time variability was statistically significantly smaller in children (0.5 vs 0.7 s; P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Overall variability is smaller in children than in adults, indicating that respiratory motion is more regular in children than in adults. This implies that a single pretreatment 4DCT could be a good representation of daily respiratory motion in children and will be at least equally beneficial for planning purposes as it is in adults. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6333119/ /pubmed/30414252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12488 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Huijskens, Sophie C.
van Dijk, Irma W. E. M.
Visser, Jorrit
Balgobind, Brian V.
Rasch, Coen R. N.
Alderliesten, Tanja
Bel, Arjan
The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis
title The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis
title_full The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis
title_fullStr The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis
title_short The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis
title_sort effectiveness of 4dct in children and adults: a pooled analysis
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30414252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12488
work_keys_str_mv AT huijskenssophiec theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT vandijkirmawem theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT visserjorrit theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT balgobindbrianv theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT raschcoenrn theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT alderliestentanja theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT belarjan theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT huijskenssophiec effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT vandijkirmawem effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT visserjorrit effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT balgobindbrianv effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT raschcoenrn effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT alderliestentanja effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis
AT belarjan effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis