Cargando…
The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis
BACKGROUND: While four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is extensively used in adults, reluctance remains to use 4DCT in children. Day‐to‐day (interfractional) variability and irregular respiration (intrafractional variability) have shown to be limiting factors of 4DCT effectiveness in adults....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30414252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12488 |
_version_ | 1783387503989882880 |
---|---|
author | Huijskens, Sophie C. van Dijk, Irma W. E. M. Visser, Jorrit Balgobind, Brian V. Rasch, Coen R. N. Alderliesten, Tanja Bel, Arjan |
author_facet | Huijskens, Sophie C. van Dijk, Irma W. E. M. Visser, Jorrit Balgobind, Brian V. Rasch, Coen R. N. Alderliesten, Tanja Bel, Arjan |
author_sort | Huijskens, Sophie C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is extensively used in adults, reluctance remains to use 4DCT in children. Day‐to‐day (interfractional) variability and irregular respiration (intrafractional variability) have shown to be limiting factors of 4DCT effectiveness in adults. In order to evaluate 4DCT applicability in children, the purpose of this study is to quantify inter‐ and intrafractional variability of respiratory motion in children and adults. The pooled analysis enables a solid comparison to reveal if 4DCT application for planning purposes in children could be valid. METHODS/MATERIALS: We retrospectively included 90 patients (45 children and 45 adults), for whom the diaphragm was visible on abdominal/thoracic free‐breathing cone beam CTs (480 pediatric, 524 adult CBCTs). For each CBCT, the cranial–caudal position of end‐exhale and end‐inhale positions of the right diaphragm dome were manually selected in the projection images. The difference in position between both phases defines the amplitude. Cycle time equaled inspiratory plus expiratory time. We analyzed the variability of the inter‐ and intrafractional respiratory‐induced diaphragm motion. RESULTS: Ranges of respiratory motion characteristics were large in both children and adults (amplitude: 4–17 vs 5–24 mm, cycle time 2.1–3.9 vs 2.7–6.5 s). The mean amplitude was slightly smaller in children than in adults (10.7 vs 12.3 mm; P = 0.06). Interfractional amplitude variability was statistically significantly smaller in children than in adults (1.4 vs 2.2 mm; P = 0.00). Mean cycle time was statistically significantly shorter in children (2.9 vs 3.6 s; P = 0.00). Additionally, intrafractional cycle time variability was statistically significantly smaller in children (0.5 vs 0.7 s; P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Overall variability is smaller in children than in adults, indicating that respiratory motion is more regular in children than in adults. This implies that a single pretreatment 4DCT could be a good representation of daily respiratory motion in children and will be at least equally beneficial for planning purposes as it is in adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6333119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63331192019-01-23 The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis Huijskens, Sophie C. van Dijk, Irma W. E. M. Visser, Jorrit Balgobind, Brian V. Rasch, Coen R. N. Alderliesten, Tanja Bel, Arjan J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging BACKGROUND: While four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is extensively used in adults, reluctance remains to use 4DCT in children. Day‐to‐day (interfractional) variability and irregular respiration (intrafractional variability) have shown to be limiting factors of 4DCT effectiveness in adults. In order to evaluate 4DCT applicability in children, the purpose of this study is to quantify inter‐ and intrafractional variability of respiratory motion in children and adults. The pooled analysis enables a solid comparison to reveal if 4DCT application for planning purposes in children could be valid. METHODS/MATERIALS: We retrospectively included 90 patients (45 children and 45 adults), for whom the diaphragm was visible on abdominal/thoracic free‐breathing cone beam CTs (480 pediatric, 524 adult CBCTs). For each CBCT, the cranial–caudal position of end‐exhale and end‐inhale positions of the right diaphragm dome were manually selected in the projection images. The difference in position between both phases defines the amplitude. Cycle time equaled inspiratory plus expiratory time. We analyzed the variability of the inter‐ and intrafractional respiratory‐induced diaphragm motion. RESULTS: Ranges of respiratory motion characteristics were large in both children and adults (amplitude: 4–17 vs 5–24 mm, cycle time 2.1–3.9 vs 2.7–6.5 s). The mean amplitude was slightly smaller in children than in adults (10.7 vs 12.3 mm; P = 0.06). Interfractional amplitude variability was statistically significantly smaller in children than in adults (1.4 vs 2.2 mm; P = 0.00). Mean cycle time was statistically significantly shorter in children (2.9 vs 3.6 s; P = 0.00). Additionally, intrafractional cycle time variability was statistically significantly smaller in children (0.5 vs 0.7 s; P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Overall variability is smaller in children than in adults, indicating that respiratory motion is more regular in children than in adults. This implies that a single pretreatment 4DCT could be a good representation of daily respiratory motion in children and will be at least equally beneficial for planning purposes as it is in adults. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6333119/ /pubmed/30414252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12488 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Huijskens, Sophie C. van Dijk, Irma W. E. M. Visser, Jorrit Balgobind, Brian V. Rasch, Coen R. N. Alderliesten, Tanja Bel, Arjan The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis |
title | The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis |
title_full | The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis |
title_short | The effectiveness of 4DCT in children and adults: A pooled analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of 4dct in children and adults: a pooled analysis |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30414252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12488 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huijskenssophiec theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT vandijkirmawem theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT visserjorrit theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT balgobindbrianv theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT raschcoenrn theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT alderliestentanja theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT belarjan theeffectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT huijskenssophiec effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT vandijkirmawem effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT visserjorrit effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT balgobindbrianv effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT raschcoenrn effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT alderliestentanja effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis AT belarjan effectivenessof4dctinchildrenandadultsapooledanalysis |