Cargando…

The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator

Accurate beam modeling is essential to help ensure overall accuracy in the radiotherapy process. This study describes our experience with beam model validation of a Monaco treatment planning system on a Versa HD linear accelerator. Data were collected such that Monaco beam models could be generated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snyder, Jeffrey E., Hyer, Daniel E., Flynn, Ryan T., Boczkowski, Amanda, Wang, Dongxu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30525308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12507
_version_ 1783387504685088768
author Snyder, Jeffrey E.
Hyer, Daniel E.
Flynn, Ryan T.
Boczkowski, Amanda
Wang, Dongxu
author_facet Snyder, Jeffrey E.
Hyer, Daniel E.
Flynn, Ryan T.
Boczkowski, Amanda
Wang, Dongxu
author_sort Snyder, Jeffrey E.
collection PubMed
description Accurate beam modeling is essential to help ensure overall accuracy in the radiotherapy process. This study describes our experience with beam model validation of a Monaco treatment planning system on a Versa HD linear accelerator. Data were collected such that Monaco beam models could be generated using three algorithms: collapsed cone (CC) and photon Monte Carlo (MC) for photon beams, and electron Monte Carlo (eMC) for electron beams. Validations are performed on measured percent depth doses (PDDs) and profiles, for open‐field point‐doses in homogenous and heterogeneous media, and for obliquely incident electron beams. Gamma analysis is used to assess the agreement between calculation and measurement for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, including volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiation therapy (VMAT SBRT). For all relevant conditions, gamma index values below 1 are obtained when comparing Monaco calculated PDDs and profiles with measured data. Point‐doses in a water medium are found to be within 2% agreement of commissioning data in 99.5% and 98.6% of the points computed by MC and CC, respectively. All point‐dose calculations for the eMC algorithm in water are within 4% agreement of measurement, and 92% of measurements are within 3%. In heterogeneous media of air and cortical bone, both CC and MC yielded better than 3% agreement with ion chamber measurements. eMC yielded 3% agreement to measurement downstream of air with oblique beams of up to 27°, 5% agreement distal to bone, and within 4% agreement at extended source to surface distance (SSD) for all electron energies except 6 MeV. The 6‐MeV point of measurement is on a steep dose gradient which may impact the magnitude of discrepancy measured. The average gamma passing rate for IMRT/VMAT plans is 96.9% (±2.1%) and 98.0% (±1.9%) for VMAT SBRT when evaluated using 3%/2 mm criteria. Monaco beam models for the Versa HD linac were successfully commissioned for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6333122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63331222019-01-23 The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator Snyder, Jeffrey E. Hyer, Daniel E. Flynn, Ryan T. Boczkowski, Amanda Wang, Dongxu J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Accurate beam modeling is essential to help ensure overall accuracy in the radiotherapy process. This study describes our experience with beam model validation of a Monaco treatment planning system on a Versa HD linear accelerator. Data were collected such that Monaco beam models could be generated using three algorithms: collapsed cone (CC) and photon Monte Carlo (MC) for photon beams, and electron Monte Carlo (eMC) for electron beams. Validations are performed on measured percent depth doses (PDDs) and profiles, for open‐field point‐doses in homogenous and heterogeneous media, and for obliquely incident electron beams. Gamma analysis is used to assess the agreement between calculation and measurement for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, including volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiation therapy (VMAT SBRT). For all relevant conditions, gamma index values below 1 are obtained when comparing Monaco calculated PDDs and profiles with measured data. Point‐doses in a water medium are found to be within 2% agreement of commissioning data in 99.5% and 98.6% of the points computed by MC and CC, respectively. All point‐dose calculations for the eMC algorithm in water are within 4% agreement of measurement, and 92% of measurements are within 3%. In heterogeneous media of air and cortical bone, both CC and MC yielded better than 3% agreement with ion chamber measurements. eMC yielded 3% agreement to measurement downstream of air with oblique beams of up to 27°, 5% agreement distal to bone, and within 4% agreement at extended source to surface distance (SSD) for all electron energies except 6 MeV. The 6‐MeV point of measurement is on a steep dose gradient which may impact the magnitude of discrepancy measured. The average gamma passing rate for IMRT/VMAT plans is 96.9% (±2.1%) and 98.0% (±1.9%) for VMAT SBRT when evaluated using 3%/2 mm criteria. Monaco beam models for the Versa HD linac were successfully commissioned for clinical use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6333122/ /pubmed/30525308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12507 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Snyder, Jeffrey E.
Hyer, Daniel E.
Flynn, Ryan T.
Boczkowski, Amanda
Wang, Dongxu
The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator
title The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator
title_full The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator
title_fullStr The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator
title_full_unstemmed The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator
title_short The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator
title_sort commissioning and validation of monaco treatment planning system on an elekta versahd linear accelerator
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30525308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12507
work_keys_str_mv AT snyderjeffreye thecommissioningandvalidationofmonacotreatmentplanningsystemonanelektaversahdlinearaccelerator
AT hyerdaniele thecommissioningandvalidationofmonacotreatmentplanningsystemonanelektaversahdlinearaccelerator
AT flynnryant thecommissioningandvalidationofmonacotreatmentplanningsystemonanelektaversahdlinearaccelerator
AT boczkowskiamanda thecommissioningandvalidationofmonacotreatmentplanningsystemonanelektaversahdlinearaccelerator
AT wangdongxu thecommissioningandvalidationofmonacotreatmentplanningsystemonanelektaversahdlinearaccelerator
AT snyderjeffreye commissioningandvalidationofmonacotreatmentplanningsystemonanelektaversahdlinearaccelerator
AT hyerdaniele commissioningandvalidationofmonacotreatmentplanningsystemonanelektaversahdlinearaccelerator
AT flynnryant commissioningandvalidationofmonacotreatmentplanningsystemonanelektaversahdlinearaccelerator
AT boczkowskiamanda commissioningandvalidationofmonacotreatmentplanningsystemonanelektaversahdlinearaccelerator
AT wangdongxu commissioningandvalidationofmonacotreatmentplanningsystemonanelektaversahdlinearaccelerator