Cargando…

Commissioning of a respiratory gating system involving a pressure sensor in carbon‐ion scanning radiotherapy

This study reports the commissioning methodology and results of a respiratory gating system [AZ – 733 V/733 VI (Anzai Medical Co., Japan)] using a pressure sensor in carbon‐ion scanning radiotherapy. Commissioning includes choosing a location and method for pressure sensor installation, delay time m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mizuno, Hideyuki, Saito, Osami, Tajiri, Minoru, Kimura, Taku, Kuroiwa, Daigo, Shirai, Toshiyuki, Inaniwa, Taku, Fukahori, Mai, Miki, Kentaro, Fukuda, Shigekazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30387271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12463
Descripción
Sumario:This study reports the commissioning methodology and results of a respiratory gating system [AZ – 733 V/733 VI (Anzai Medical Co., Japan)] using a pressure sensor in carbon‐ion scanning radiotherapy. Commissioning includes choosing a location and method for pressure sensor installation, delay time measurement of the system, and the final flow test. Additionally, we proposed a methodology for the determination of a threshold level of generating an on/off gate for the beam to the respiratory waveform, which is important for clinical application. Regarding the location and method for installation of the pressure sensor, the actual person's abdomen, back of the body position, and supine/prone positioning were checked. By comparing the motion between the pressure sensor output and the reference LED sensor motion, the chest rear surface was shown to be unsuitable for the sensor installation, due to noise in the signal caused by the cardiac beat. Regarding delay time measurement of the system, measurements were performed for the following four steps: (a). Actual motion to wave signal generation; (b). Wave signal to gate signal generation; (c). Gate signal to beam on/off signal generation; (d). Beam on/off signal to the beam irradiation. The total delay time measured was 46 ms (beam on)/33 ms (beam off); these were within the prescribed tolerance time (<100 ms). Regarding the final flow test, an end‐to‐end test was performed with a patient verification system using an actual carbon‐ion beam; the respiratory gating irradiation was successfully performed, in accordance with the intended timing. Finally, regarding the method for determining the threshold level of the gate generation of the respiration waveform, the target motion obtained from 4D‐CT was assumed to be correlated with the waveform obtained from the pressure sensor; it was used to determine the threshold value in amplitude direction.