Cargando…

Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET

PURPOSE: Cerebral beta-amyloid and regional glucose metabolism assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) are used as diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The present study validates the incremental diagnostic value of amyloid PET in addition to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hellwig, Sabine, Frings, Lars, Bormann, Tobias, Vach, Werner, Buchert, Ralph, Meyer, Philipp T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4111-3
_version_ 1783387606276374528
author Hellwig, Sabine
Frings, Lars
Bormann, Tobias
Vach, Werner
Buchert, Ralph
Meyer, Philipp T.
author_facet Hellwig, Sabine
Frings, Lars
Bormann, Tobias
Vach, Werner
Buchert, Ralph
Meyer, Philipp T.
author_sort Hellwig, Sabine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cerebral beta-amyloid and regional glucose metabolism assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) are used as diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The present study validates the incremental diagnostic value of amyloid PET in addition to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET in a real-life memory clinic population. METHODS: Of 138 consecutive patients with cognitive impairment who received combined [(18)F]FDG and [(11)C]PIB PET, 84 were diagnosed with major neurocognitive disorder (DSM-5) and included. Baseline clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses were independently established with and without access to amyloid PET results and were dichotomized into AD or non-AD disorders. The incremental value of amyloid PET was evaluated in terms of: (1) the change in clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses, (2) the change in agreement between clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses, and (3) diagnostic accuracy using an interdisciplinary consensus diagnosis after an extended follow-up (2.4 ± 1.3 years after PET) as the reference. RESULTS: After disclosure of the amyloid PET results, clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses changed in 23% and 18% of patients, respectively, and agreement between both ratings increased from 62% to 86% (p < 0.001). The accuracy of clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses improved from 71% to 89% (p < 0.01) and from 76% to 94% (p < 0.001), respectively. The additional value of amyloid PET was rather uniform in relation to age at onset and consistency with appropriate use criteria. CONCLUSION: Amyloid PET provides significant incremental diagnostic value beyond clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses of AD. Given the high diagnostic accuracy of combined clinical and amyloid PET assessment, further studies are needed to clarify the role of an additional [(18)F]FDG PET scan in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6333717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63337172019-01-27 Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET Hellwig, Sabine Frings, Lars Bormann, Tobias Vach, Werner Buchert, Ralph Meyer, Philipp T. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: Cerebral beta-amyloid and regional glucose metabolism assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) are used as diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The present study validates the incremental diagnostic value of amyloid PET in addition to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET in a real-life memory clinic population. METHODS: Of 138 consecutive patients with cognitive impairment who received combined [(18)F]FDG and [(11)C]PIB PET, 84 were diagnosed with major neurocognitive disorder (DSM-5) and included. Baseline clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses were independently established with and without access to amyloid PET results and were dichotomized into AD or non-AD disorders. The incremental value of amyloid PET was evaluated in terms of: (1) the change in clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses, (2) the change in agreement between clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses, and (3) diagnostic accuracy using an interdisciplinary consensus diagnosis after an extended follow-up (2.4 ± 1.3 years after PET) as the reference. RESULTS: After disclosure of the amyloid PET results, clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses changed in 23% and 18% of patients, respectively, and agreement between both ratings increased from 62% to 86% (p < 0.001). The accuracy of clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses improved from 71% to 89% (p < 0.01) and from 76% to 94% (p < 0.001), respectively. The additional value of amyloid PET was rather uniform in relation to age at onset and consistency with appropriate use criteria. CONCLUSION: Amyloid PET provides significant incremental diagnostic value beyond clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses of AD. Given the high diagnostic accuracy of combined clinical and amyloid PET assessment, further studies are needed to clarify the role of an additional [(18)F]FDG PET scan in these patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-08-10 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6333717/ /pubmed/30094462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4111-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hellwig, Sabine
Frings, Lars
Bormann, Tobias
Vach, Werner
Buchert, Ralph
Meyer, Philipp T.
Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET
title Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET
title_full Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET
title_fullStr Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET
title_full_unstemmed Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET
title_short Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET
title_sort amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)f]fdg pet
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4111-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hellwigsabine amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet
AT fringslars amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet
AT bormanntobias amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet
AT vachwerner amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet
AT buchertralph amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet
AT meyerphilippt amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet