Cargando…
Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET
PURPOSE: Cerebral beta-amyloid and regional glucose metabolism assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) are used as diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The present study validates the incremental diagnostic value of amyloid PET in addition to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4111-3 |
_version_ | 1783387606276374528 |
---|---|
author | Hellwig, Sabine Frings, Lars Bormann, Tobias Vach, Werner Buchert, Ralph Meyer, Philipp T. |
author_facet | Hellwig, Sabine Frings, Lars Bormann, Tobias Vach, Werner Buchert, Ralph Meyer, Philipp T. |
author_sort | Hellwig, Sabine |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Cerebral beta-amyloid and regional glucose metabolism assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) are used as diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The present study validates the incremental diagnostic value of amyloid PET in addition to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET in a real-life memory clinic population. METHODS: Of 138 consecutive patients with cognitive impairment who received combined [(18)F]FDG and [(11)C]PIB PET, 84 were diagnosed with major neurocognitive disorder (DSM-5) and included. Baseline clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses were independently established with and without access to amyloid PET results and were dichotomized into AD or non-AD disorders. The incremental value of amyloid PET was evaluated in terms of: (1) the change in clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses, (2) the change in agreement between clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses, and (3) diagnostic accuracy using an interdisciplinary consensus diagnosis after an extended follow-up (2.4 ± 1.3 years after PET) as the reference. RESULTS: After disclosure of the amyloid PET results, clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses changed in 23% and 18% of patients, respectively, and agreement between both ratings increased from 62% to 86% (p < 0.001). The accuracy of clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses improved from 71% to 89% (p < 0.01) and from 76% to 94% (p < 0.001), respectively. The additional value of amyloid PET was rather uniform in relation to age at onset and consistency with appropriate use criteria. CONCLUSION: Amyloid PET provides significant incremental diagnostic value beyond clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses of AD. Given the high diagnostic accuracy of combined clinical and amyloid PET assessment, further studies are needed to clarify the role of an additional [(18)F]FDG PET scan in these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6333717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63337172019-01-27 Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET Hellwig, Sabine Frings, Lars Bormann, Tobias Vach, Werner Buchert, Ralph Meyer, Philipp T. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: Cerebral beta-amyloid and regional glucose metabolism assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) are used as diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The present study validates the incremental diagnostic value of amyloid PET in addition to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET in a real-life memory clinic population. METHODS: Of 138 consecutive patients with cognitive impairment who received combined [(18)F]FDG and [(11)C]PIB PET, 84 were diagnosed with major neurocognitive disorder (DSM-5) and included. Baseline clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses were independently established with and without access to amyloid PET results and were dichotomized into AD or non-AD disorders. The incremental value of amyloid PET was evaluated in terms of: (1) the change in clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses, (2) the change in agreement between clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses, and (3) diagnostic accuracy using an interdisciplinary consensus diagnosis after an extended follow-up (2.4 ± 1.3 years after PET) as the reference. RESULTS: After disclosure of the amyloid PET results, clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses changed in 23% and 18% of patients, respectively, and agreement between both ratings increased from 62% to 86% (p < 0.001). The accuracy of clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses improved from 71% to 89% (p < 0.01) and from 76% to 94% (p < 0.001), respectively. The additional value of amyloid PET was rather uniform in relation to age at onset and consistency with appropriate use criteria. CONCLUSION: Amyloid PET provides significant incremental diagnostic value beyond clinical and [(18)F]FDG PET diagnoses of AD. Given the high diagnostic accuracy of combined clinical and amyloid PET assessment, further studies are needed to clarify the role of an additional [(18)F]FDG PET scan in these patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-08-10 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6333717/ /pubmed/30094462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4111-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hellwig, Sabine Frings, Lars Bormann, Tobias Vach, Werner Buchert, Ralph Meyer, Philipp T. Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET |
title | Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET |
title_full | Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET |
title_fullStr | Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET |
title_full_unstemmed | Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET |
title_short | Amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)F]FDG PET |
title_sort | amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis of dementia: incremental value compared to clinical diagnosis and [(18)f]fdg pet |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4111-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hellwigsabine amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet AT fringslars amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet AT bormanntobias amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet AT vachwerner amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet AT buchertralph amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet AT meyerphilippt amyloidimagingfordifferentialdiagnosisofdementiaincrementalvaluecomparedtoclinicaldiagnosisand18ffdgpet |