Cargando…

Prognostic analysis of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is routinely used in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) for staging, assessment of remission and recurrence, and estimation of therapeutic efficacy. In this study, we aimed to assess the role of an early interim PET/com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Ling, Kreissl, Michael C., Su, Liping, Wu, Zhifang, Hacker, Marcus, Liu, Jianzhong, Zhang, Xi, Bo, Yunfeng, Zhang, Hongyu, Li, Xiang, Li, Sijin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30382301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4198-6
_version_ 1783387608425955328
author Yuan, Ling
Kreissl, Michael C.
Su, Liping
Wu, Zhifang
Hacker, Marcus
Liu, Jianzhong
Zhang, Xi
Bo, Yunfeng
Zhang, Hongyu
Li, Xiang
Li, Sijin
author_facet Yuan, Ling
Kreissl, Michael C.
Su, Liping
Wu, Zhifang
Hacker, Marcus
Liu, Jianzhong
Zhang, Xi
Bo, Yunfeng
Zhang, Hongyu
Li, Xiang
Li, Sijin
author_sort Yuan, Ling
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is routinely used in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) for staging, assessment of remission and recurrence, and estimation of therapeutic efficacy. In this study, we aimed to assess the role of an early interim PET/computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of response in DLBCL. METHODS: Sixty primary DLBCL patients (31 females) were analyzed. Baseline and follow-up (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed in patients after one cycle (n = 30) and two cycles (n = 30) of chemotherapy. The ΔSUVmax% was calculated. Patients were additionally evaluated using the conventional Deauville five-point scale (D-5PS) system. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was employed to characterize the MYC gene status. We determined the optimum cutoff value of ΔSUVmax% using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Kaplan–Meier analysis was applied to test for the influence of prognostic values. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff for the prediction of treatment outcome was a ΔSUVmax% of 57% (after one cycle) and 63% (after two cycles); we could not detect a difference in accuracy with respect to a PET scan performed after one cycle and two cycles of chemotherapy (P  > 0.05). The ΔSUVmax% and the D-5PS (score 5) showed the highest prognostic value compared to a score of 3 and/or 4 (both after one cycle and two cycles). No significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or the area of under the curve (AUC) of ΔSUVmax% and D-5PS (score 5) was observed between PETs performed after one cycle or two cycles of therapy (P  > 0.05). ΔSUVmax%, D-5PS (score 5), and MYC gene rearrangement correlated significantly (P  < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT after one cycle of chemotherapy is feasible and yields similar predictive results as compared to an interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT after two cycles of chemotherapy in patients suffering from DLBCL. The combination of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT with the MYC gene diagnosis might provide increased prognostic value for DLBCL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6333726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63337262019-01-27 Prognostic analysis of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy Yuan, Ling Kreissl, Michael C. Su, Liping Wu, Zhifang Hacker, Marcus Liu, Jianzhong Zhang, Xi Bo, Yunfeng Zhang, Hongyu Li, Xiang Li, Sijin Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is routinely used in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) for staging, assessment of remission and recurrence, and estimation of therapeutic efficacy. In this study, we aimed to assess the role of an early interim PET/computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of response in DLBCL. METHODS: Sixty primary DLBCL patients (31 females) were analyzed. Baseline and follow-up (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed in patients after one cycle (n = 30) and two cycles (n = 30) of chemotherapy. The ΔSUVmax% was calculated. Patients were additionally evaluated using the conventional Deauville five-point scale (D-5PS) system. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was employed to characterize the MYC gene status. We determined the optimum cutoff value of ΔSUVmax% using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Kaplan–Meier analysis was applied to test for the influence of prognostic values. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff for the prediction of treatment outcome was a ΔSUVmax% of 57% (after one cycle) and 63% (after two cycles); we could not detect a difference in accuracy with respect to a PET scan performed after one cycle and two cycles of chemotherapy (P  > 0.05). The ΔSUVmax% and the D-5PS (score 5) showed the highest prognostic value compared to a score of 3 and/or 4 (both after one cycle and two cycles). No significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or the area of under the curve (AUC) of ΔSUVmax% and D-5PS (score 5) was observed between PETs performed after one cycle or two cycles of therapy (P  > 0.05). ΔSUVmax%, D-5PS (score 5), and MYC gene rearrangement correlated significantly (P  < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT after one cycle of chemotherapy is feasible and yields similar predictive results as compared to an interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT after two cycles of chemotherapy in patients suffering from DLBCL. The combination of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT with the MYC gene diagnosis might provide increased prognostic value for DLBCL. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-10-31 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6333726/ /pubmed/30382301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4198-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yuan, Ling
Kreissl, Michael C.
Su, Liping
Wu, Zhifang
Hacker, Marcus
Liu, Jianzhong
Zhang, Xi
Bo, Yunfeng
Zhang, Hongyu
Li, Xiang
Li, Sijin
Prognostic analysis of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy
title Prognostic analysis of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy
title_full Prognostic analysis of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy
title_fullStr Prognostic analysis of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic analysis of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy
title_short Prognostic analysis of interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy
title_sort prognostic analysis of interim (18)f-fdg pet/ct in patients with diffuse large b cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30382301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4198-6
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanling prognosticanalysisofinterim18ffdgpetctinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaafteronecycleversustwocyclesofchemotherapy
AT kreisslmichaelc prognosticanalysisofinterim18ffdgpetctinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaafteronecycleversustwocyclesofchemotherapy
AT suliping prognosticanalysisofinterim18ffdgpetctinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaafteronecycleversustwocyclesofchemotherapy
AT wuzhifang prognosticanalysisofinterim18ffdgpetctinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaafteronecycleversustwocyclesofchemotherapy
AT hackermarcus prognosticanalysisofinterim18ffdgpetctinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaafteronecycleversustwocyclesofchemotherapy
AT liujianzhong prognosticanalysisofinterim18ffdgpetctinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaafteronecycleversustwocyclesofchemotherapy
AT zhangxi prognosticanalysisofinterim18ffdgpetctinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaafteronecycleversustwocyclesofchemotherapy
AT boyunfeng prognosticanalysisofinterim18ffdgpetctinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaafteronecycleversustwocyclesofchemotherapy
AT zhanghongyu prognosticanalysisofinterim18ffdgpetctinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaafteronecycleversustwocyclesofchemotherapy
AT lixiang prognosticanalysisofinterim18ffdgpetctinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaafteronecycleversustwocyclesofchemotherapy
AT lisijin prognosticanalysisofinterim18ffdgpetctinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaafteronecycleversustwocyclesofchemotherapy