Cargando…
Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) application for luteal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693136 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.73603 |
_version_ | 1783387678229659648 |
---|---|
author | Karakaş Yılmaz, Nafiye Kara, Mustafa Hançerlioğulları, Necati Erkılınç, Selçuk Coşkun, Buğra Sargın, Ayla Erkaya, Salim |
author_facet | Karakaş Yılmaz, Nafiye Kara, Mustafa Hançerlioğulları, Necati Erkılınç, Selçuk Coşkun, Buğra Sargın, Ayla Erkaya, Salim |
author_sort | Karakaş Yılmaz, Nafiye |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) application for luteal phase support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 456 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to luteal phase support type: in group 1 (n=158), single-dose triptorelin acetate 0.1 mg was given on the sixth day after the oocyte pick-up (OPU). In group 2 (n=298), hCG 1500 IU was given on day 4, 7 and 10 after the OPU. RESULTS: Both groups were homogeneous in relation with age and antral follicle count. The number of stimulation days and endometrial thickness on hCG day (mm) were found to be significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (p<0.001). The clinical pregnancy rate was slightly higher in the GnRHa group, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, luteal phase support with single-dose GnRHa might be as efficient as three doses of hCG. Large prospective, randomized-controlled studies are required comparing GnRHa and hCG for luteal phase support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6334251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63342512019-01-28 Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes Karakaş Yılmaz, Nafiye Kara, Mustafa Hançerlioğulları, Necati Erkılınç, Selçuk Coşkun, Buğra Sargın, Ayla Erkaya, Salim Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) application for luteal phase support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 456 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to luteal phase support type: in group 1 (n=158), single-dose triptorelin acetate 0.1 mg was given on the sixth day after the oocyte pick-up (OPU). In group 2 (n=298), hCG 1500 IU was given on day 4, 7 and 10 after the OPU. RESULTS: Both groups were homogeneous in relation with age and antral follicle count. The number of stimulation days and endometrial thickness on hCG day (mm) were found to be significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (p<0.001). The clinical pregnancy rate was slightly higher in the GnRHa group, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, luteal phase support with single-dose GnRHa might be as efficient as three doses of hCG. Large prospective, randomized-controlled studies are required comparing GnRHa and hCG for luteal phase support. Galenos Publishing 2018-12 2019-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6334251/ /pubmed/30693136 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.73603 Text en ©Copyright 2018 by Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology | Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Karakaş Yılmaz, Nafiye Kara, Mustafa Hançerlioğulları, Necati Erkılınç, Selçuk Coşkun, Buğra Sargın, Ayla Erkaya, Salim Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes |
title | Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes |
title_full | Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes |
title_fullStr | Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes |
title_short | Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes |
title_sort | analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693136 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.73603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karakasyılmaznafiye analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes AT karamustafa analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes AT hancerliogullarınecati analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes AT erkılıncselcuk analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes AT coskunbugra analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes AT sargınayla analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes AT erkayasalim analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes |