Cargando…

Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) application for luteal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karakaş Yılmaz, Nafiye, Kara, Mustafa, Hançerlioğulları, Necati, Erkılınç, Selçuk, Coşkun, Buğra, Sargın, Ayla, Erkaya, Salim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693136
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.73603
_version_ 1783387678229659648
author Karakaş Yılmaz, Nafiye
Kara, Mustafa
Hançerlioğulları, Necati
Erkılınç, Selçuk
Coşkun, Buğra
Sargın, Ayla
Erkaya, Salim
author_facet Karakaş Yılmaz, Nafiye
Kara, Mustafa
Hançerlioğulları, Necati
Erkılınç, Selçuk
Coşkun, Buğra
Sargın, Ayla
Erkaya, Salim
author_sort Karakaş Yılmaz, Nafiye
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) application for luteal phase support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 456 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to luteal phase support type: in group 1 (n=158), single-dose triptorelin acetate 0.1 mg was given on the sixth day after the oocyte pick-up (OPU). In group 2 (n=298), hCG 1500 IU was given on day 4, 7 and 10 after the OPU. RESULTS: Both groups were homogeneous in relation with age and antral follicle count. The number of stimulation days and endometrial thickness on hCG day (mm) were found to be significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (p<0.001). The clinical pregnancy rate was slightly higher in the GnRHa group, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, luteal phase support with single-dose GnRHa might be as efficient as three doses of hCG. Large prospective, randomized-controlled studies are required comparing GnRHa and hCG for luteal phase support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6334251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63342512019-01-28 Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes Karakaş Yılmaz, Nafiye Kara, Mustafa Hançerlioğulları, Necati Erkılınç, Selçuk Coşkun, Buğra Sargın, Ayla Erkaya, Salim Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) application for luteal phase support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 456 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to luteal phase support type: in group 1 (n=158), single-dose triptorelin acetate 0.1 mg was given on the sixth day after the oocyte pick-up (OPU). In group 2 (n=298), hCG 1500 IU was given on day 4, 7 and 10 after the OPU. RESULTS: Both groups were homogeneous in relation with age and antral follicle count. The number of stimulation days and endometrial thickness on hCG day (mm) were found to be significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (p<0.001). The clinical pregnancy rate was slightly higher in the GnRHa group, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, luteal phase support with single-dose GnRHa might be as efficient as three doses of hCG. Large prospective, randomized-controlled studies are required comparing GnRHa and hCG for luteal phase support. Galenos Publishing 2018-12 2019-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6334251/ /pubmed/30693136 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.73603 Text en ©Copyright 2018 by Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology | Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Karakaş Yılmaz, Nafiye
Kara, Mustafa
Hançerlioğulları, Necati
Erkılınç, Selçuk
Coşkun, Buğra
Sargın, Ayla
Erkaya, Salim
Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes
title Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes
title_full Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes
title_fullStr Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes
title_short Analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes
title_sort analysis of two different luteal phase support regimes and evaluation of in vitro fertilization-intra cytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693136
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.73603
work_keys_str_mv AT karakasyılmaznafiye analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes
AT karamustafa analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes
AT hancerliogullarınecati analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes
AT erkılıncselcuk analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes
AT coskunbugra analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes
AT sargınayla analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes
AT erkayasalim analysisoftwodifferentlutealphasesupportregimesandevaluationofinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjectionoutcomes