Cargando…

Increased urokinase and consumption of α(2)‐antiplasmin as an explanation for the loss of benefit of tranexamic acid after treatment delay

ESSENTIALS: Delayed treatment with tranexamic acid results in loss of efficacy and poor outcomes. Increasing urokinase activity may account for adverse effects of late tranexamic acid treatment. Urokinase + tranexamic acid produces plasmin in plasma or blood and disrupts clotting. α(2)‐Antiplasmin c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Longstaff, C., Locke, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30451372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.14338
Descripción
Sumario:ESSENTIALS: Delayed treatment with tranexamic acid results in loss of efficacy and poor outcomes. Increasing urokinase activity may account for adverse effects of late tranexamic acid treatment. Urokinase + tranexamic acid produces plasmin in plasma or blood and disrupts clotting. α(2)‐Antiplasmin consumption with ongoing fibrinolysis increases plasmin‐induced coagulopathy. SUMMARY: BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an effective antifibrinolytic agent with a proven safety record. However, large clinical trials show TXA becomes ineffective or harmful if treatment is delayed beyond 3 h. The mechanism is unknown but urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) has been implicated. METHODS: Inhibitory mechanisms of TXA were explored in a variety of clot lysis systems using plasma and whole blood. Lysis by tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), uPA and plasmin were investigated. Coagulopathy was investigated using ROTEM and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). RESULTS: IC(50) values for antifibrinolytic activity of TXA varied from < 10 to > 1000 μmol L(−1) depending on the system, but good fibrin protection was observed in the presence of tPA, uPA and plasmin. However, in plasma or blood, active plasmin was generated by TXA + uPA (but not tPA) and coagulopathy developed leading to no or poor clot formation. The extent of coagulopathy was sensitive to available α(2)‐antiplasmin. No clot formed with plasma containing 40% normal α(2)‐antiplasmin after short incubation with TXA + uPA. Adding purified α(2)‐antiplasmin progressively restored clotting. Plasmin could be inhibited by aprotinin, IC(50) = 530 nmol L(−1), in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Tranexamic acid protects fibrin but stimulates uPA activity and slows inhibition of plasmin by α(2)‐antiplasmin. Plasmin proteolytic activity digests fibrinogen and disrupts coagulation, exacerbated when α(2)‐antiplasmin is consumed by ongoing fibrinolysis. Additional direct inhibition of plasmin by aprotinin may prevent development of coagulopathy and extend the useful time window of TXA treatment.