Cargando…

Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up benefits stroke/TIA patients with low education: a randomized controlled trial sub-study

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of two forms of secondary preventive follow-up on the association between education level and levels of blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). METHODS: We incl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irewall, Anna-Lotta, Ögren, Joachim, Bergström, Lisa, Laurell, Katarina, Söderström, Lars, Mooe, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3131-4
_version_ 1783387758122762240
author Irewall, Anna-Lotta
Ögren, Joachim
Bergström, Lisa
Laurell, Katarina
Söderström, Lars
Mooe, Thomas
author_facet Irewall, Anna-Lotta
Ögren, Joachim
Bergström, Lisa
Laurell, Katarina
Söderström, Lars
Mooe, Thomas
author_sort Irewall, Anna-Lotta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of two forms of secondary preventive follow-up on the association between education level and levels of blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). METHODS: We included a population-based cohort of 771 stroke and TIA patients randomly assigned (1:1) to secondary preventive follow-up within primary health care (control) or nurse-led, telephone-based follow-up (intervention) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013, as part of the NAILED (nurse-based age-independent intervention to limit evolution of disease) stroke risk factor trial. We compared BP and LDL-C levels 12 months after hospital discharge in relation to education level (low, ≤10 years; high, >10 years) separately for the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: Among controls, systolic BP (SBP) decreased only among the highly educated (−2.5 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.2 to −4.8), whereas LDL-C increased in the low-education group (0.2 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.3). At 12 months, controls with low education not more than 70 years of age had higher SBP than controls of the same age with high education (5.8 mm Hg, 95% CI 1.0 to 10.6). In contrast, SBP in the intervention group decreased similarly regardless of education level, LDL-C decreased among those with low education (−0.3 mmol/L, 95% CI −0.2 to −0.4) and, in the subgroup not more than 70 years old, low-educated participants had lower LDL-C at 12 months than those with high education (0.3 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up led to comparable improvements in BP across education groups, while routine follow-up disfavored those with low education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN23868518, June 19, 2012 - Retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6334622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63346222019-01-23 Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up benefits stroke/TIA patients with low education: a randomized controlled trial sub-study Irewall, Anna-Lotta Ögren, Joachim Bergström, Lisa Laurell, Katarina Söderström, Lars Mooe, Thomas Trials Research BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of two forms of secondary preventive follow-up on the association between education level and levels of blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). METHODS: We included a population-based cohort of 771 stroke and TIA patients randomly assigned (1:1) to secondary preventive follow-up within primary health care (control) or nurse-led, telephone-based follow-up (intervention) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013, as part of the NAILED (nurse-based age-independent intervention to limit evolution of disease) stroke risk factor trial. We compared BP and LDL-C levels 12 months after hospital discharge in relation to education level (low, ≤10 years; high, >10 years) separately for the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: Among controls, systolic BP (SBP) decreased only among the highly educated (−2.5 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.2 to −4.8), whereas LDL-C increased in the low-education group (0.2 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.3). At 12 months, controls with low education not more than 70 years of age had higher SBP than controls of the same age with high education (5.8 mm Hg, 95% CI 1.0 to 10.6). In contrast, SBP in the intervention group decreased similarly regardless of education level, LDL-C decreased among those with low education (−0.3 mmol/L, 95% CI −0.2 to −0.4) and, in the subgroup not more than 70 years old, low-educated participants had lower LDL-C at 12 months than those with high education (0.3 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up led to comparable improvements in BP across education groups, while routine follow-up disfavored those with low education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN23868518, June 19, 2012 - Retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2019-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6334622/ /pubmed/30646948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3131-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Irewall, Anna-Lotta
Ögren, Joachim
Bergström, Lisa
Laurell, Katarina
Söderström, Lars
Mooe, Thomas
Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up benefits stroke/TIA patients with low education: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up benefits stroke/TIA patients with low education: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title_full Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up benefits stroke/TIA patients with low education: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title_fullStr Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up benefits stroke/TIA patients with low education: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title_full_unstemmed Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up benefits stroke/TIA patients with low education: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title_short Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up benefits stroke/TIA patients with low education: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title_sort nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up benefits stroke/tia patients with low education: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3131-4
work_keys_str_mv AT irewallannalotta nurseledtelephonebasedsecondarypreventivefollowupbenefitsstroketiapatientswithloweducationarandomizedcontrolledtrialsubstudy
AT ogrenjoachim nurseledtelephonebasedsecondarypreventivefollowupbenefitsstroketiapatientswithloweducationarandomizedcontrolledtrialsubstudy
AT bergstromlisa nurseledtelephonebasedsecondarypreventivefollowupbenefitsstroketiapatientswithloweducationarandomizedcontrolledtrialsubstudy
AT laurellkatarina nurseledtelephonebasedsecondarypreventivefollowupbenefitsstroketiapatientswithloweducationarandomizedcontrolledtrialsubstudy
AT soderstromlars nurseledtelephonebasedsecondarypreventivefollowupbenefitsstroketiapatientswithloweducationarandomizedcontrolledtrialsubstudy
AT mooethomas nurseledtelephonebasedsecondarypreventivefollowupbenefitsstroketiapatientswithloweducationarandomizedcontrolledtrialsubstudy