Cargando…
Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when?
Multiple myeloma is one of the most common hematological malignancies, affecting mainly elderly patients. The treatment landscape for the management of this disease has evolved significantly over the past 15 years, and a vast array of therapeutics is now available, including immunomodulatory drugs,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-018-3546-8 |
_version_ | 1783387777713307648 |
---|---|
author | Goldschmidt, Hartmut Ashcroft, John Szabo, Zsolt Garderet, Laurent |
author_facet | Goldschmidt, Hartmut Ashcroft, John Szabo, Zsolt Garderet, Laurent |
author_sort | Goldschmidt, Hartmut |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple myeloma is one of the most common hematological malignancies, affecting mainly elderly patients. The treatment landscape for the management of this disease has evolved significantly over the past 15 years, and a vast array of therapeutics is now available, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. As a result, deciding which drugs to use and when, and whether these should be used in a particular order or combination, can be challenging. Although combination regimens are often associated with deeper responses and better long-term outcomes than monotherapy, and are becoming the standard of care, they may result in significant incremental toxicity; hence, a sequential approach may be more appropriate for some patients. In particular, treatment choices can vary depending on whether the patient has newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, is eligible for transplant, has relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, or is considered to have high-risk disease. In this review, we discuss factors to be taken into account when making treatment decisions in each of these settings. We also briefly discuss possible therapeutic strategies involving agents that may become available in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6334731 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63347312019-02-01 Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when? Goldschmidt, Hartmut Ashcroft, John Szabo, Zsolt Garderet, Laurent Ann Hematol Review Article Multiple myeloma is one of the most common hematological malignancies, affecting mainly elderly patients. The treatment landscape for the management of this disease has evolved significantly over the past 15 years, and a vast array of therapeutics is now available, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. As a result, deciding which drugs to use and when, and whether these should be used in a particular order or combination, can be challenging. Although combination regimens are often associated with deeper responses and better long-term outcomes than monotherapy, and are becoming the standard of care, they may result in significant incremental toxicity; hence, a sequential approach may be more appropriate for some patients. In particular, treatment choices can vary depending on whether the patient has newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, is eligible for transplant, has relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, or is considered to have high-risk disease. In this review, we discuss factors to be taken into account when making treatment decisions in each of these settings. We also briefly discuss possible therapeutic strategies involving agents that may become available in the future. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-23 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6334731/ /pubmed/30470875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-018-3546-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Goldschmidt, Hartmut Ashcroft, John Szabo, Zsolt Garderet, Laurent Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when? |
title | Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when? |
title_full | Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when? |
title_fullStr | Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when? |
title_full_unstemmed | Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when? |
title_short | Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when? |
title_sort | navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-018-3546-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goldschmidthartmut navigatingthetreatmentlandscapeinmultiplemyelomawhichcombinationstouseandwhen AT ashcroftjohn navigatingthetreatmentlandscapeinmultiplemyelomawhichcombinationstouseandwhen AT szabozsolt navigatingthetreatmentlandscapeinmultiplemyelomawhichcombinationstouseandwhen AT garderetlaurent navigatingthetreatmentlandscapeinmultiplemyelomawhichcombinationstouseandwhen |