Cargando…

Location and thickness of delaminated rotator cuff tears: cross-sectional analysis with surgery record review

BACKGROUND: To facilitate better treatment, we analyzed morphologic features of delamination from the viewpoint of the location of delamination and the thickness of each layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 270 shoulders that consecutively underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, 210 were included. D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Motoki, Nimura, Akimoto, Takahashi, Norimasa, Mochizuki, Tomoyuki, Kato, Ryuichi, Sugaya, Hiroyuki, Akita, Keiichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2017.11.004
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To facilitate better treatment, we analyzed morphologic features of delamination from the viewpoint of the location of delamination and the thickness of each layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 270 shoulders that consecutively underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, 210 were included. During the operation, the surgeon assessed the size of the rotator cuff tear, determined the presence and location of delamination, and compared the thickness between superficial and deep layers if delamination was present. Immediately after the operation, the surgeon wrote down the data in the record form. The authors retrospectively referred to these surgical records to investigate those items. RESULTS: Delamination was found in 111 of 210 shoulders. The overall preoperative Constant score did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. In terms of the location, 7.2% cases had delamination in the anterior part, 74.8% in the posterior part, and 18.0% in both parts (Fleiss κ = 0.9). The larger the rotator cuff tear, the more frequently the delamination was limited to the posterior part (trend P = .001). As for layer thickness comparison, 40.0% of the shoulders with small tears, 38.8% with medium tears, 66.0% with large tears, and 80.0% with massive tears had a thicker deep layer than superficial layer (Fleiss κ = 0.9). The larger the size of the rotator cuff tear, the more frequently the deep layer was thicker than the superficial layer (trend P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The larger the rotator cuff tear, the more carefully shoulder surgeons should observe and treat the posterior and deep part of delamination.