Cargando…

Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study

BACKGROUND: This study focused on the unique aspect of investigating shoulder morphometric differences between 2 distinct populations. METHODS: We used 90 computed tomography images of cadaveric shoulders for this study; 45 scans belonged to the South African (SA) cohort (49.74 ± 15.4 years) and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dey, Roopam, Roche, Steven, Rosch, Theo, Mutsvangwa, Tinashe, Charilaou, Johan, Sivarasu, Sudesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2017.11.007
_version_ 1783387801751912448
author Dey, Roopam
Roche, Steven
Rosch, Theo
Mutsvangwa, Tinashe
Charilaou, Johan
Sivarasu, Sudesh
author_facet Dey, Roopam
Roche, Steven
Rosch, Theo
Mutsvangwa, Tinashe
Charilaou, Johan
Sivarasu, Sudesh
author_sort Dey, Roopam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study focused on the unique aspect of investigating shoulder morphometric differences between 2 distinct populations. METHODS: We used 90 computed tomography images of cadaveric shoulders for this study; 45 scans belonged to the South African (SA) cohort (49.74 ± 15.4 years) and the rest were Swiss (CH; 53.8 ± 21 years). The articulating surfaces of the glenohumeral joint were extracted, and their morphometric features, such as head circular diameter, glenoid and humeral head radius of curvature, head height, and humeral height, were measured. RESULTS: The mean interpopulation difference in the circular diameter of the humerus was 2.0 mm (P = .017) and 1.86 mm (P > .05) in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions, respectively. The difference in the radius of curvature between the populations was 1.17 mm (P = .037). The SA shoulders were found to be longer than the CH shoulders by 8.4 mm (P > .05). There was no significant difference in the glenoid radius of curvature. The SA shoulders had higher glenohumeral mismatch (P = .005) and lower conformity index (P = .001) in comparison to the CH shoulders. CONCLUSION: This study presents anatomic differences between African and European glenohumeral articulating surfaces. The results suggest that the glenohumeral geometry is both gender and population specific, and future joint replacements may be designed to address these differences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6334885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63348852019-01-23 Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study Dey, Roopam Roche, Steven Rosch, Theo Mutsvangwa, Tinashe Charilaou, Johan Sivarasu, Sudesh JSES Open Access Article BACKGROUND: This study focused on the unique aspect of investigating shoulder morphometric differences between 2 distinct populations. METHODS: We used 90 computed tomography images of cadaveric shoulders for this study; 45 scans belonged to the South African (SA) cohort (49.74 ± 15.4 years) and the rest were Swiss (CH; 53.8 ± 21 years). The articulating surfaces of the glenohumeral joint were extracted, and their morphometric features, such as head circular diameter, glenoid and humeral head radius of curvature, head height, and humeral height, were measured. RESULTS: The mean interpopulation difference in the circular diameter of the humerus was 2.0 mm (P = .017) and 1.86 mm (P > .05) in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions, respectively. The difference in the radius of curvature between the populations was 1.17 mm (P = .037). The SA shoulders were found to be longer than the CH shoulders by 8.4 mm (P > .05). There was no significant difference in the glenoid radius of curvature. The SA shoulders had higher glenohumeral mismatch (P = .005) and lower conformity index (P = .001) in comparison to the CH shoulders. CONCLUSION: This study presents anatomic differences between African and European glenohumeral articulating surfaces. The results suggest that the glenohumeral geometry is both gender and population specific, and future joint replacements may be designed to address these differences. Elsevier 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6334885/ /pubmed/30675559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2017.11.007 Text en © 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dey, Roopam
Roche, Steven
Rosch, Theo
Mutsvangwa, Tinashe
Charilaou, Johan
Sivarasu, Sudesh
Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study
title Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study
title_full Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study
title_fullStr Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study
title_full_unstemmed Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study
title_short Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study
title_sort anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6334885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2017.11.007
work_keys_str_mv AT deyroopam anatomicvariationsinglenohumeraljointaninterpopulationstudy
AT rochesteven anatomicvariationsinglenohumeraljointaninterpopulationstudy
AT roschtheo anatomicvariationsinglenohumeraljointaninterpopulationstudy
AT mutsvangwatinashe anatomicvariationsinglenohumeraljointaninterpopulationstudy
AT charilaoujohan anatomicvariationsinglenohumeraljointaninterpopulationstudy
AT sivarasusudesh anatomicvariationsinglenohumeraljointaninterpopulationstudy