Cargando…
Understanding ‘Good Health care’ from the Patient’s Perspective: Development of a Conceptual Model Using Group Concept Mapping
BACKGROUND: There is an increasing focus on measuring performance indicators of health care providers, but there is a lack of patient input into what defines ‘good care.’ OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to develop a conceptual model of ‘good health care’ from the patient’s perspective. Explorat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29968180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-018-0320-x |
_version_ | 1783387874085830656 |
---|---|
author | McCaffrey, Stacey A. Chiauzzi, Emil Chan, Caroline Hoole, Michael |
author_facet | McCaffrey, Stacey A. Chiauzzi, Emil Chan, Caroline Hoole, Michael |
author_sort | McCaffrey, Stacey A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is an increasing focus on measuring performance indicators of health care providers, but there is a lack of patient input into what defines ‘good care.’ OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to develop a conceptual model of ‘good health care’ from the patient’s perspective. Exploratory analyses were also conducted to investigate (1) differences in patient priorities based on demographic and clinical factors, and (2) differences between patients and health stakeholders (e.g., clinicians, researchers) with respect to patient health care priorities. METHOD: These objectives were accomplished using group concept mapping. Following statement generation, PatientsLikeMe members, Baltimore community members recruited through a university-affiliated clinic, and stakeholders individually sorted the statements into meaningful categories and rated the statements with respect to importance. Qualitative and quantitative analyses generated a final conceptual model. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients and 17 stakeholders provided input during statement generation. The 1779-statement pool was reduced to 79 statements for the structuring (sorting and rating) activities. In total, 221 patients and 16 stakeholders completed structuring activities through group concept mapping software. Results yielded a 10-cluster solution, and patient priorities were found to be relatively invariant across demographic/clinical groups. Results were also similar between patients and stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive qualitative and quantitative investigation is an important first step in developing patient-reported outcome performance measures that capture the aspects of health care that are most important and relevant for patients. Limitations and future directions are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6335377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63353772019-02-01 Understanding ‘Good Health care’ from the Patient’s Perspective: Development of a Conceptual Model Using Group Concept Mapping McCaffrey, Stacey A. Chiauzzi, Emil Chan, Caroline Hoole, Michael Patient Original Research Article BACKGROUND: There is an increasing focus on measuring performance indicators of health care providers, but there is a lack of patient input into what defines ‘good care.’ OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to develop a conceptual model of ‘good health care’ from the patient’s perspective. Exploratory analyses were also conducted to investigate (1) differences in patient priorities based on demographic and clinical factors, and (2) differences between patients and health stakeholders (e.g., clinicians, researchers) with respect to patient health care priorities. METHOD: These objectives were accomplished using group concept mapping. Following statement generation, PatientsLikeMe members, Baltimore community members recruited through a university-affiliated clinic, and stakeholders individually sorted the statements into meaningful categories and rated the statements with respect to importance. Qualitative and quantitative analyses generated a final conceptual model. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients and 17 stakeholders provided input during statement generation. The 1779-statement pool was reduced to 79 statements for the structuring (sorting and rating) activities. In total, 221 patients and 16 stakeholders completed structuring activities through group concept mapping software. Results yielded a 10-cluster solution, and patient priorities were found to be relatively invariant across demographic/clinical groups. Results were also similar between patients and stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive qualitative and quantitative investigation is an important first step in developing patient-reported outcome performance measures that capture the aspects of health care that are most important and relevant for patients. Limitations and future directions are discussed. Springer International Publishing 2018-07-02 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6335377/ /pubmed/29968180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-018-0320-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article McCaffrey, Stacey A. Chiauzzi, Emil Chan, Caroline Hoole, Michael Understanding ‘Good Health care’ from the Patient’s Perspective: Development of a Conceptual Model Using Group Concept Mapping |
title | Understanding ‘Good Health care’ from the Patient’s Perspective: Development of a Conceptual Model Using Group Concept Mapping |
title_full | Understanding ‘Good Health care’ from the Patient’s Perspective: Development of a Conceptual Model Using Group Concept Mapping |
title_fullStr | Understanding ‘Good Health care’ from the Patient’s Perspective: Development of a Conceptual Model Using Group Concept Mapping |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding ‘Good Health care’ from the Patient’s Perspective: Development of a Conceptual Model Using Group Concept Mapping |
title_short | Understanding ‘Good Health care’ from the Patient’s Perspective: Development of a Conceptual Model Using Group Concept Mapping |
title_sort | understanding ‘good health care’ from the patient’s perspective: development of a conceptual model using group concept mapping |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29968180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-018-0320-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccaffreystaceya understandinggoodhealthcarefromthepatientsperspectivedevelopmentofaconceptualmodelusinggroupconceptmapping AT chiauzziemil understandinggoodhealthcarefromthepatientsperspectivedevelopmentofaconceptualmodelusinggroupconceptmapping AT chancaroline understandinggoodhealthcarefromthepatientsperspectivedevelopmentofaconceptualmodelusinggroupconceptmapping AT hoolemichael understandinggoodhealthcarefromthepatientsperspectivedevelopmentofaconceptualmodelusinggroupconceptmapping |