Cargando…

Different prognostic implication of ypTNM stage and pTNM stage for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND: Pathological stage is considered as the best prognosis indicator for gastric cancer. With the increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the latest TNM staging included a new pathological stage of ypTNM for patients with NACT. However, no study has investigated if ypTNM stage has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ziyu, Wang, Yinkui, Ying, Xiangji, Shan, Fei, Wu, Zhouqiao, Zhang, Lianhai, Li, Shuangxi, Jia, Yongning, Ren, Hui, Ji, Jiafu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30651085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5283-3
_version_ 1783387941646630912
author Li, Ziyu
Wang, Yinkui
Ying, Xiangji
Shan, Fei
Wu, Zhouqiao
Zhang, Lianhai
Li, Shuangxi
Jia, Yongning
Ren, Hui
Ji, Jiafu
author_facet Li, Ziyu
Wang, Yinkui
Ying, Xiangji
Shan, Fei
Wu, Zhouqiao
Zhang, Lianhai
Li, Shuangxi
Jia, Yongning
Ren, Hui
Ji, Jiafu
author_sort Li, Ziyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pathological stage is considered as the best prognosis indicator for gastric cancer. With the increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the latest TNM staging included a new pathological stage of ypTNM for patients with NACT. However, no study has investigated if ypTNM stage has the same prognostic implication as pTNM stage for gastric cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively selected eligible patients within a prospectively maintained database containing all patients treated with gastric cancer in Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2007 to 2015 using overall survival as the outcome. Patients using ypTNM and pTNM were 1:1 matched by propensity scores (PS) calculated from a model containing variables associated with ypTNM use or survival. Overall survival was compared by unconditional Cox regression. Conventional multivariate analysis was conducted to corroborate PS matching results. RESULTS: 1441 patients were included in the analysis with a median follow-up of 37 months (range = 2–106). The matched sample contained 756 patients. After PS matching, patients with specific ypTNM stage were 1.34 (95%CI = 1.05–1.72, P = 0.019) times more likely to die than patients with the same pTNM stage. Similar to the results of PS matching, multivariate Cox regression yielded a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.35 (95%CI = 1.09–1.67, P = 0.006). Subgroup analysis indicated this survival difference between ypTNM and pTNM stage varied by the specific TNM stage of patients. The HR was 3.44 (95%CI = 1.06–11.18, P = 0.040) and 1.28 (95%CI = 1.00–1.62, P = 0.048) for patients in stage I and III, respectively; whereas for stage II patients, no significant difference was observed (HR = 1.37, 95%CI = 0.78–2.38, P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Gastric cancer patients with specific ypTNM stage had worse prognosis compared to those at the same stage defined by pTNM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5283-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6335703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63357032019-01-23 Different prognostic implication of ypTNM stage and pTNM stage for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis Li, Ziyu Wang, Yinkui Ying, Xiangji Shan, Fei Wu, Zhouqiao Zhang, Lianhai Li, Shuangxi Jia, Yongning Ren, Hui Ji, Jiafu BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Pathological stage is considered as the best prognosis indicator for gastric cancer. With the increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the latest TNM staging included a new pathological stage of ypTNM for patients with NACT. However, no study has investigated if ypTNM stage has the same prognostic implication as pTNM stage for gastric cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively selected eligible patients within a prospectively maintained database containing all patients treated with gastric cancer in Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2007 to 2015 using overall survival as the outcome. Patients using ypTNM and pTNM were 1:1 matched by propensity scores (PS) calculated from a model containing variables associated with ypTNM use or survival. Overall survival was compared by unconditional Cox regression. Conventional multivariate analysis was conducted to corroborate PS matching results. RESULTS: 1441 patients were included in the analysis with a median follow-up of 37 months (range = 2–106). The matched sample contained 756 patients. After PS matching, patients with specific ypTNM stage were 1.34 (95%CI = 1.05–1.72, P = 0.019) times more likely to die than patients with the same pTNM stage. Similar to the results of PS matching, multivariate Cox regression yielded a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.35 (95%CI = 1.09–1.67, P = 0.006). Subgroup analysis indicated this survival difference between ypTNM and pTNM stage varied by the specific TNM stage of patients. The HR was 3.44 (95%CI = 1.06–11.18, P = 0.040) and 1.28 (95%CI = 1.00–1.62, P = 0.048) for patients in stage I and III, respectively; whereas for stage II patients, no significant difference was observed (HR = 1.37, 95%CI = 0.78–2.38, P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Gastric cancer patients with specific ypTNM stage had worse prognosis compared to those at the same stage defined by pTNM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5283-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6335703/ /pubmed/30651085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5283-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Ziyu
Wang, Yinkui
Ying, Xiangji
Shan, Fei
Wu, Zhouqiao
Zhang, Lianhai
Li, Shuangxi
Jia, Yongning
Ren, Hui
Ji, Jiafu
Different prognostic implication of ypTNM stage and pTNM stage for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title Different prognostic implication of ypTNM stage and pTNM stage for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full Different prognostic implication of ypTNM stage and pTNM stage for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_fullStr Different prognostic implication of ypTNM stage and pTNM stage for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Different prognostic implication of ypTNM stage and pTNM stage for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_short Different prognostic implication of ypTNM stage and pTNM stage for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_sort different prognostic implication of yptnm stage and ptnm stage for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30651085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5283-3
work_keys_str_mv AT liziyu differentprognosticimplicationofyptnmstageandptnmstageforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT wangyinkui differentprognosticimplicationofyptnmstageandptnmstageforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT yingxiangji differentprognosticimplicationofyptnmstageandptnmstageforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT shanfei differentprognosticimplicationofyptnmstageandptnmstageforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT wuzhouqiao differentprognosticimplicationofyptnmstageandptnmstageforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT zhanglianhai differentprognosticimplicationofyptnmstageandptnmstageforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT lishuangxi differentprognosticimplicationofyptnmstageandptnmstageforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT jiayongning differentprognosticimplicationofyptnmstageandptnmstageforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT renhui differentprognosticimplicationofyptnmstageandptnmstageforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT jijiafu differentprognosticimplicationofyptnmstageandptnmstageforgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis