Cargando…

Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Modified Rodnan Skin Score: Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II)

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) using combined data from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (I and II). METHODS: MCID estimates for the mRSS at 12 months were calculated using three anchors: change in scor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khanna, Dinesh, Clements, Philip J., Volkmann, Elizabeth R., Wilhalme, Holly, Tseng, Chi-hong, Furst, Daniel E., Roth, Michael D., Distler, Oliver, Tashkin, Donald P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30651141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1809-y
_version_ 1783387973164728320
author Khanna, Dinesh
Clements, Philip J.
Volkmann, Elizabeth R.
Wilhalme, Holly
Tseng, Chi-hong
Furst, Daniel E.
Roth, Michael D.
Distler, Oliver
Tashkin, Donald P.
author_facet Khanna, Dinesh
Clements, Philip J.
Volkmann, Elizabeth R.
Wilhalme, Holly
Tseng, Chi-hong
Furst, Daniel E.
Roth, Michael D.
Distler, Oliver
Tashkin, Donald P.
author_sort Khanna, Dinesh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) using combined data from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (I and II). METHODS: MCID estimates for the mRSS at 12 months were calculated using three anchors: change in scores on the Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index from baseline to 12 months, change in scores on the Patient Global Assessment from baseline to 12 months, and answer at 12 month for the Short Form-36 health transition question “Compared to one year ago, how would you rate your health in general now?” We determined the mRSS MCID estimates for all participants and for those with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). We then assessed associations between MCID estimates of mRSS improvement and patient-reported outcomes, using Student’s t test to compare the mean differences in patient outcomes between those who met the MCID improvement criteria versus those who did not meet the improvement criteria. RESULTS: The mean (SD) mRSS at baseline was 14.75 (10.72) for all participants and 20.93 (9.61) for those with dcSSc. The MCID estimate for mRSS improvement at 12 months ranged from 3 to 4 units for the overall group (improvement of 20–27% from baseline) and was 5 units for those with dcSSc (improvement of 24% from baseline). Those who met the mRSS MCID improvement criteria had statistically significant improvements in scores on the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary, the Transition Dyspnea Index, and joint contractures at 12 months. CONCLUSION: MCID estimates for the mRSS were 3–4 units for all participants and 5 units for those with dcSSc. These findings are consistent with previously reported MCID estimates for systemic sclerosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6335851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63358512019-01-23 Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Modified Rodnan Skin Score: Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II) Khanna, Dinesh Clements, Philip J. Volkmann, Elizabeth R. Wilhalme, Holly Tseng, Chi-hong Furst, Daniel E. Roth, Michael D. Distler, Oliver Tashkin, Donald P. Arthritis Res Ther Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) using combined data from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (I and II). METHODS: MCID estimates for the mRSS at 12 months were calculated using three anchors: change in scores on the Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index from baseline to 12 months, change in scores on the Patient Global Assessment from baseline to 12 months, and answer at 12 month for the Short Form-36 health transition question “Compared to one year ago, how would you rate your health in general now?” We determined the mRSS MCID estimates for all participants and for those with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). We then assessed associations between MCID estimates of mRSS improvement and patient-reported outcomes, using Student’s t test to compare the mean differences in patient outcomes between those who met the MCID improvement criteria versus those who did not meet the improvement criteria. RESULTS: The mean (SD) mRSS at baseline was 14.75 (10.72) for all participants and 20.93 (9.61) for those with dcSSc. The MCID estimate for mRSS improvement at 12 months ranged from 3 to 4 units for the overall group (improvement of 20–27% from baseline) and was 5 units for those with dcSSc (improvement of 24% from baseline). Those who met the mRSS MCID improvement criteria had statistically significant improvements in scores on the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary, the Transition Dyspnea Index, and joint contractures at 12 months. CONCLUSION: MCID estimates for the mRSS were 3–4 units for all participants and 5 units for those with dcSSc. These findings are consistent with previously reported MCID estimates for systemic sclerosis. BioMed Central 2019-01-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6335851/ /pubmed/30651141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1809-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khanna, Dinesh
Clements, Philip J.
Volkmann, Elizabeth R.
Wilhalme, Holly
Tseng, Chi-hong
Furst, Daniel E.
Roth, Michael D.
Distler, Oliver
Tashkin, Donald P.
Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Modified Rodnan Skin Score: Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II)
title Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Modified Rodnan Skin Score: Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II)
title_full Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Modified Rodnan Skin Score: Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II)
title_fullStr Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Modified Rodnan Skin Score: Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II)
title_full_unstemmed Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Modified Rodnan Skin Score: Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II)
title_short Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Modified Rodnan Skin Score: Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II)
title_sort minimal clinically important differences for the modified rodnan skin score: results from the scleroderma lung studies (sls-i and sls-ii)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30651141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1809-y
work_keys_str_mv AT khannadinesh minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreresultsfromthesclerodermalungstudiesslsiandslsii
AT clementsphilipj minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreresultsfromthesclerodermalungstudiesslsiandslsii
AT volkmannelizabethr minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreresultsfromthesclerodermalungstudiesslsiandslsii
AT wilhalmeholly minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreresultsfromthesclerodermalungstudiesslsiandslsii
AT tsengchihong minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreresultsfromthesclerodermalungstudiesslsiandslsii
AT furstdaniele minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreresultsfromthesclerodermalungstudiesslsiandslsii
AT rothmichaeld minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreresultsfromthesclerodermalungstudiesslsiandslsii
AT distleroliver minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreresultsfromthesclerodermalungstudiesslsiandslsii
AT tashkindonaldp minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreresultsfromthesclerodermalungstudiesslsiandslsii