Cargando…

Effect of Low-Frequency Vibration on Muscle Response under Different Neurointact Conditions

Stretch reflex is an important factor that influences the biomechanical response of the human body under whole-body vibration. However, there is a lack of quantitative evaluation at lower frequencies. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of vibration on the stretch reflex and,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chaofei, Wang, Wenjun, Anderson, Dennis, Guan, Sishu, Li, Guofa, Xiang, Hongyi, Zhao, Hui, Cheng, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1971045
_version_ 1783387975799799808
author Zhang, Chaofei
Wang, Wenjun
Anderson, Dennis
Guan, Sishu
Li, Guofa
Xiang, Hongyi
Zhao, Hui
Cheng, Bo
author_facet Zhang, Chaofei
Wang, Wenjun
Anderson, Dennis
Guan, Sishu
Li, Guofa
Xiang, Hongyi
Zhao, Hui
Cheng, Bo
author_sort Zhang, Chaofei
collection PubMed
description Stretch reflex is an important factor that influences the biomechanical response of the human body under whole-body vibration. However, there is a lack of quantitative evaluation at lower frequencies. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of vibration on the stretch reflex and, in particular, to explore the quantitative relationship between dynamic muscle responses and low-frequency vibrations. The gastrocnemius muscle of 45 Sprague-Dawley rats was dissected. Sinusoidal vibrations of five discrete frequencies (2~16 Hz) with peak-to-peak amplitudes of 1 mm were applied to the gastrocnemius muscles with 2 mm or 3 mm prelengthening. Variables including dynamic muscle force, vibration acceleration, and displacement were recorded in two conditions, with and without the stretch reflex. Results showed that the dynamic muscle forces decreased by 20% on average for the 2 mm prelengthening group after the stretch reflex was blocked and by 24% for the 3 mm prelengthening group. Statistical analysis indicated that the amplitude of dynamic muscle force in the “with stretch reflex” condition was significantly larger than that in the “without stretch reflex” condition (p < 0.001). The tension-length curve was found to be a nonlinear hysteresis loop that changed with frequency. The phase difference between the dynamic muscle force and the length change was affected significantly by vibration frequency (p < 0.01), and the minimum frequency was 4–8 Hz. Experimental results of this study could benefit musculoskeletal model by providing a theoretical support to build a stretch reflex model for low-frequency vibration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6335862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63358622019-02-04 Effect of Low-Frequency Vibration on Muscle Response under Different Neurointact Conditions Zhang, Chaofei Wang, Wenjun Anderson, Dennis Guan, Sishu Li, Guofa Xiang, Hongyi Zhao, Hui Cheng, Bo Appl Bionics Biomech Research Article Stretch reflex is an important factor that influences the biomechanical response of the human body under whole-body vibration. However, there is a lack of quantitative evaluation at lower frequencies. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of vibration on the stretch reflex and, in particular, to explore the quantitative relationship between dynamic muscle responses and low-frequency vibrations. The gastrocnemius muscle of 45 Sprague-Dawley rats was dissected. Sinusoidal vibrations of five discrete frequencies (2~16 Hz) with peak-to-peak amplitudes of 1 mm were applied to the gastrocnemius muscles with 2 mm or 3 mm prelengthening. Variables including dynamic muscle force, vibration acceleration, and displacement were recorded in two conditions, with and without the stretch reflex. Results showed that the dynamic muscle forces decreased by 20% on average for the 2 mm prelengthening group after the stretch reflex was blocked and by 24% for the 3 mm prelengthening group. Statistical analysis indicated that the amplitude of dynamic muscle force in the “with stretch reflex” condition was significantly larger than that in the “without stretch reflex” condition (p < 0.001). The tension-length curve was found to be a nonlinear hysteresis loop that changed with frequency. The phase difference between the dynamic muscle force and the length change was affected significantly by vibration frequency (p < 0.01), and the minimum frequency was 4–8 Hz. Experimental results of this study could benefit musculoskeletal model by providing a theoretical support to build a stretch reflex model for low-frequency vibration. Hindawi 2019-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6335862/ /pubmed/30719071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1971045 Text en Copyright © 2019 Chaofei Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Chaofei
Wang, Wenjun
Anderson, Dennis
Guan, Sishu
Li, Guofa
Xiang, Hongyi
Zhao, Hui
Cheng, Bo
Effect of Low-Frequency Vibration on Muscle Response under Different Neurointact Conditions
title Effect of Low-Frequency Vibration on Muscle Response under Different Neurointact Conditions
title_full Effect of Low-Frequency Vibration on Muscle Response under Different Neurointact Conditions
title_fullStr Effect of Low-Frequency Vibration on Muscle Response under Different Neurointact Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Low-Frequency Vibration on Muscle Response under Different Neurointact Conditions
title_short Effect of Low-Frequency Vibration on Muscle Response under Different Neurointact Conditions
title_sort effect of low-frequency vibration on muscle response under different neurointact conditions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30719071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1971045
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchaofei effectoflowfrequencyvibrationonmuscleresponseunderdifferentneurointactconditions
AT wangwenjun effectoflowfrequencyvibrationonmuscleresponseunderdifferentneurointactconditions
AT andersondennis effectoflowfrequencyvibrationonmuscleresponseunderdifferentneurointactconditions
AT guansishu effectoflowfrequencyvibrationonmuscleresponseunderdifferentneurointactconditions
AT liguofa effectoflowfrequencyvibrationonmuscleresponseunderdifferentneurointactconditions
AT xianghongyi effectoflowfrequencyvibrationonmuscleresponseunderdifferentneurointactconditions
AT zhaohui effectoflowfrequencyvibrationonmuscleresponseunderdifferentneurointactconditions
AT chengbo effectoflowfrequencyvibrationonmuscleresponseunderdifferentneurointactconditions