Cargando…

Computed Tomography: Return on Investment and Regional Disparity Factor Analysis

The number of computed tomography (CT) systems in operation in Japan is approximately 4.3 times higher than that of the OECD average. However, CT systems are expensive, and thus, a heavy financial burden for hospital management. We calculate the annual net profits from CT introduction in Japan for s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imai, Shinya, Akahane, Manabu, Imamura, Tomoaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00380
_version_ 1783387986957697024
author Imai, Shinya
Akahane, Manabu
Imamura, Tomoaki
author_facet Imai, Shinya
Akahane, Manabu
Imamura, Tomoaki
author_sort Imai, Shinya
collection PubMed
description The number of computed tomography (CT) systems in operation in Japan is approximately 4.3 times higher than that of the OECD average. However, CT systems are expensive, and thus, a heavy financial burden for hospital management. We calculate the annual net profits from CT introduction in Japan for single-slice CT (SSCT), multi-slice CT (MSCT), number of hospital beds, and prefecture. We also analyze the factors that affect CT profitability. First, the annual income per CT in operation is estimated for 2011. Second, the annual costs per CT are calculated as the sum of depreciation, maintenance, and labor costs. Finally, the annual net profits per CT are estimated for SSCT and MSCT, the number of hospital beds, and prefecture. A correlation analysis between the annual net profits, population, and number of physicians per CT equipment is used to determine the determinants of the net CT profits by prefecture. Our results show that, for hospitals with fewer than 100 beds, the annual net CT profits are higher for SSCT than MSCT, and vice versa for hospitals with at least 100 beds. Both SSCT and MSCT increased profits as the number of hospital beds increased. The annual net CT profits per prefecture are USD −12,105 for SSCT and USD 87,233 for MSCT, on average. The annual net profits per prefecture and population per CT show positive correlations with both SSCT and MSCT, as do the annual net profits per prefecture and number of physicians per CT. Thus, choosing high-performance MSCT is advantageous in terms of profitability in facilities with at least 100 beds. Additionally, CT profitability presumably affects the balance between the number of introduced CTs, population per CT, and number of physicians per CT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6335945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63359452019-01-25 Computed Tomography: Return on Investment and Regional Disparity Factor Analysis Imai, Shinya Akahane, Manabu Imamura, Tomoaki Front Public Health Public Health The number of computed tomography (CT) systems in operation in Japan is approximately 4.3 times higher than that of the OECD average. However, CT systems are expensive, and thus, a heavy financial burden for hospital management. We calculate the annual net profits from CT introduction in Japan for single-slice CT (SSCT), multi-slice CT (MSCT), number of hospital beds, and prefecture. We also analyze the factors that affect CT profitability. First, the annual income per CT in operation is estimated for 2011. Second, the annual costs per CT are calculated as the sum of depreciation, maintenance, and labor costs. Finally, the annual net profits per CT are estimated for SSCT and MSCT, the number of hospital beds, and prefecture. A correlation analysis between the annual net profits, population, and number of physicians per CT equipment is used to determine the determinants of the net CT profits by prefecture. Our results show that, for hospitals with fewer than 100 beds, the annual net CT profits are higher for SSCT than MSCT, and vice versa for hospitals with at least 100 beds. Both SSCT and MSCT increased profits as the number of hospital beds increased. The annual net CT profits per prefecture are USD −12,105 for SSCT and USD 87,233 for MSCT, on average. The annual net profits per prefecture and population per CT show positive correlations with both SSCT and MSCT, as do the annual net profits per prefecture and number of physicians per CT. Thus, choosing high-performance MSCT is advantageous in terms of profitability in facilities with at least 100 beds. Additionally, CT profitability presumably affects the balance between the number of introduced CTs, population per CT, and number of physicians per CT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6335945/ /pubmed/30687691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00380 Text en Copyright © 2019 Imai, Akahane and Imamura. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Imai, Shinya
Akahane, Manabu
Imamura, Tomoaki
Computed Tomography: Return on Investment and Regional Disparity Factor Analysis
title Computed Tomography: Return on Investment and Regional Disparity Factor Analysis
title_full Computed Tomography: Return on Investment and Regional Disparity Factor Analysis
title_fullStr Computed Tomography: Return on Investment and Regional Disparity Factor Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Computed Tomography: Return on Investment and Regional Disparity Factor Analysis
title_short Computed Tomography: Return on Investment and Regional Disparity Factor Analysis
title_sort computed tomography: return on investment and regional disparity factor analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00380
work_keys_str_mv AT imaishinya computedtomographyreturnoninvestmentandregionaldisparityfactoranalysis
AT akahanemanabu computedtomographyreturnoninvestmentandregionaldisparityfactoranalysis
AT imamuratomoaki computedtomographyreturnoninvestmentandregionaldisparityfactoranalysis