Cargando…

Comparing the conventional 15 cm and the C-length approaches for central venous catheter placement

Introduction: The present guidelines recommend placing the catheter tip in the superior vena cava (SVC) above the pericardial cephalic reflection. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of two different approaches in locating the tip of the Central venous catheter (CVC) at the suggested v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarineshin, Hashem, Sharifi, Maryam, Kashani, Saeid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680081
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcvtr.2018.38
_version_ 1783387992172265472
author Jarineshin, Hashem
Sharifi, Maryam
Kashani, Saeid
author_facet Jarineshin, Hashem
Sharifi, Maryam
Kashani, Saeid
author_sort Jarineshin, Hashem
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The present guidelines recommend placing the catheter tip in the superior vena cava (SVC) above the pericardial cephalic reflection. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of two different approaches in locating the tip of the Central venous catheter (CVC) at the suggested vascular zone. Methods: This was an interventional study on two hundred patients undergoing Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) operation who required a central venous cannulation. They were randomly assigned into two groups. In the first group catheter placement was applied through using the conventional 15 cm method. In the second group a C-length method was applied for measuring the depth of catheter tip placement from the preoperative chest radiographs. For statistical analysis Chi-square test and T-test were used. Results: In the first group (15 cm) 100% of the patients had their catheters placed below the C-line (Carina line) and the average distance between the catheter tip and the C-line was +4.22±2.10 cm. In the second (C-Length) group 52% of the catheters were below C-line with an average distance of +0.77±0.5 cm. There was a meaningful difference between the two groups in respect to the catheter location depth and zone of placement (P<0.001). Conclusion: The C-Length approach in comparison to the conventional 15 cm approach resulted in a considerable higher number of catheters above the recommended C-line, thus it can provide a more reliable and safe mode for CVC placement in the SVC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6335980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63359802019-01-24 Comparing the conventional 15 cm and the C-length approaches for central venous catheter placement Jarineshin, Hashem Sharifi, Maryam Kashani, Saeid J Cardiovasc Thorac Res Original Article Introduction: The present guidelines recommend placing the catheter tip in the superior vena cava (SVC) above the pericardial cephalic reflection. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of two different approaches in locating the tip of the Central venous catheter (CVC) at the suggested vascular zone. Methods: This was an interventional study on two hundred patients undergoing Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) operation who required a central venous cannulation. They were randomly assigned into two groups. In the first group catheter placement was applied through using the conventional 15 cm method. In the second group a C-length method was applied for measuring the depth of catheter tip placement from the preoperative chest radiographs. For statistical analysis Chi-square test and T-test were used. Results: In the first group (15 cm) 100% of the patients had their catheters placed below the C-line (Carina line) and the average distance between the catheter tip and the C-line was +4.22±2.10 cm. In the second (C-Length) group 52% of the catheters were below C-line with an average distance of +0.77±0.5 cm. There was a meaningful difference between the two groups in respect to the catheter location depth and zone of placement (P<0.001). Conclusion: The C-Length approach in comparison to the conventional 15 cm approach resulted in a considerable higher number of catheters above the recommended C-line, thus it can provide a more reliable and safe mode for CVC placement in the SVC. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018 2018-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6335980/ /pubmed/30680081 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcvtr.2018.38 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jarineshin, Hashem
Sharifi, Maryam
Kashani, Saeid
Comparing the conventional 15 cm and the C-length approaches for central venous catheter placement
title Comparing the conventional 15 cm and the C-length approaches for central venous catheter placement
title_full Comparing the conventional 15 cm and the C-length approaches for central venous catheter placement
title_fullStr Comparing the conventional 15 cm and the C-length approaches for central venous catheter placement
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the conventional 15 cm and the C-length approaches for central venous catheter placement
title_short Comparing the conventional 15 cm and the C-length approaches for central venous catheter placement
title_sort comparing the conventional 15 cm and the c-length approaches for central venous catheter placement
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680081
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcvtr.2018.38
work_keys_str_mv AT jarineshinhashem comparingtheconventional15cmandtheclengthapproachesforcentralvenouscatheterplacement
AT sharifimaryam comparingtheconventional15cmandtheclengthapproachesforcentralvenouscatheterplacement
AT kashanisaeid comparingtheconventional15cmandtheclengthapproachesforcentralvenouscatheterplacement