Cargando…

Evaluation of relationship between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype with valve dysfunction and associated aortopathy

Introduction: Morphology of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) may have implication in the associated pathologies including aortic stenosis (AS), aortic insufficiency (AI) and aortic dilation. The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and patterns of valvular dysfunction and aortopathy associat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toufan Tabrizi, Mehrnoush, Rahimi Asl, Roghaieh, Nazarnia, Soheyla, Pourafkari, Leili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6335981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680084
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcvtr.2018.41
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: Morphology of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) may have implication in the associated pathologies including aortic stenosis (AS), aortic insufficiency (AI) and aortic dilation. The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and patterns of valvular dysfunction and aortopathy associated with different phenotypes of BAV in a referral center in northwest of Iran. Methods: In this prospective study patients who presented to our echocardiography lab between January 2014 and December 2015 and were diagnosed with BAV were assessed. Frequency of various BAV phenotypes and their association with valvular dysfunction and aortopathy was evaluated. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The average age of the study patients was 40±16 years, with predominance of male sex (72%). Patients with anteroposteriorly located BAV (BAV-AP) phenotype constituted majority of our cases with prevalence of 62.7%, while 37.3% of cases had right-left (BAV-RL) located valves. BAV-RL patients when compared to BAV-AP patients had higher frequencies of dilated aortic arch (25% vs. 4.3%, P < 0.001), AS (56.3% vs. 31.4%, P < 0.001), mass or vegetation on aortic valve (14.3 vs. 6.4%, P = 0.023) and lower frequencies of dilated aortic root (42.9% vs. 57.4%, P = 0.01), aortic insufficiency (68.8% vs. 79.8%, P = 0.034) and co-arctation of aorta (3.6% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.01). Conclusion: There seems to be a relationship between various BAV phenotypes, and frequency and pattern of aortic valve dysfunction and aortopathy. These findings suggest that examining leaflet morphology in BAV might help in risk stratification of these patients.