Cargando…

A multi-institutional study of bladder-preserving therapy for stage II-IV bladder cancer: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group Study (KROG 14-16)

BACKGROUND: Although radical cystectomy is a standard treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, bladder preservation therapy including transurethral resection of bladder tumor, radiotherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy has been widely adopted, recently. This retrospective analysis was performed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byun, Sang Jun, Park, Won, Cho, Kwan Ho, Cho, Jaeho, Chang, Ah Ram, Kang, Ki Mun, Kim, Jin Ho, Kim, Jin Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30653591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209998
_version_ 1783388027819655168
author Byun, Sang Jun
Park, Won
Cho, Kwan Ho
Cho, Jaeho
Chang, Ah Ram
Kang, Ki Mun
Kim, Jin Ho
Kim, Jin Hee
author_facet Byun, Sang Jun
Park, Won
Cho, Kwan Ho
Cho, Jaeho
Chang, Ah Ram
Kang, Ki Mun
Kim, Jin Ho
Kim, Jin Hee
author_sort Byun, Sang Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although radical cystectomy is a standard treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, bladder preservation therapy including transurethral resection of bladder tumor, radiotherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy has been widely adopted, recently. This retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the survival rates and prognostic factors related to treatment outcomes following bladder-preserving therapy including radiotherapy (RT) in bladder cancer with a curative intent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of 152 patients with stage II-IV bladder cancer treated with curative RT between 2000 and 2010. There were 72 patients in stage II, 49 in stage III, and 31 in stage IV. Ninety-seven patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and fifty-five with RT alone. Radiation was delivered to the pelvis (median 63 Gy), mainly with cisplatin. The median follow-up time was 35.5 months. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (45.4%) showed a complete response to RT. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 45.8%, the 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rate was 48.9%, and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 20.8%. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in the following factors according to the survival rates: patient age, initial hemoglobin level, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, clinical stage group, tumor response to RT, hydronephrosis, and concurrent chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis also revealed a significant difference in patient age (p = 0.003 in OS, p<0.017 in CSS) and tumor response to RT (p = 0.002 in OS, p<0.001 in CSS). Concurrent chemotherapy was significantly different in the DFS rates (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates reported herein are comparable to those from other studies, and tumor response and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were significant prognostic factors for better survival rates. Further randomized studies are needed to elucidate the impact of RT in bladder cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6336268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63362682019-01-30 A multi-institutional study of bladder-preserving therapy for stage II-IV bladder cancer: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group Study (KROG 14-16) Byun, Sang Jun Park, Won Cho, Kwan Ho Cho, Jaeho Chang, Ah Ram Kang, Ki Mun Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Jin Hee PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Although radical cystectomy is a standard treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, bladder preservation therapy including transurethral resection of bladder tumor, radiotherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy has been widely adopted, recently. This retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the survival rates and prognostic factors related to treatment outcomes following bladder-preserving therapy including radiotherapy (RT) in bladder cancer with a curative intent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of 152 patients with stage II-IV bladder cancer treated with curative RT between 2000 and 2010. There were 72 patients in stage II, 49 in stage III, and 31 in stage IV. Ninety-seven patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and fifty-five with RT alone. Radiation was delivered to the pelvis (median 63 Gy), mainly with cisplatin. The median follow-up time was 35.5 months. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (45.4%) showed a complete response to RT. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 45.8%, the 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rate was 48.9%, and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 20.8%. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in the following factors according to the survival rates: patient age, initial hemoglobin level, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, clinical stage group, tumor response to RT, hydronephrosis, and concurrent chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis also revealed a significant difference in patient age (p = 0.003 in OS, p<0.017 in CSS) and tumor response to RT (p = 0.002 in OS, p<0.001 in CSS). Concurrent chemotherapy was significantly different in the DFS rates (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates reported herein are comparable to those from other studies, and tumor response and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were significant prognostic factors for better survival rates. Further randomized studies are needed to elucidate the impact of RT in bladder cancer. Public Library of Science 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6336268/ /pubmed/30653591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209998 Text en © 2019 Byun et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Byun, Sang Jun
Park, Won
Cho, Kwan Ho
Cho, Jaeho
Chang, Ah Ram
Kang, Ki Mun
Kim, Jin Ho
Kim, Jin Hee
A multi-institutional study of bladder-preserving therapy for stage II-IV bladder cancer: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group Study (KROG 14-16)
title A multi-institutional study of bladder-preserving therapy for stage II-IV bladder cancer: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group Study (KROG 14-16)
title_full A multi-institutional study of bladder-preserving therapy for stage II-IV bladder cancer: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group Study (KROG 14-16)
title_fullStr A multi-institutional study of bladder-preserving therapy for stage II-IV bladder cancer: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group Study (KROG 14-16)
title_full_unstemmed A multi-institutional study of bladder-preserving therapy for stage II-IV bladder cancer: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group Study (KROG 14-16)
title_short A multi-institutional study of bladder-preserving therapy for stage II-IV bladder cancer: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group Study (KROG 14-16)
title_sort multi-institutional study of bladder-preserving therapy for stage ii-iv bladder cancer: a korean radiation oncology group study (krog 14-16)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30653591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209998
work_keys_str_mv AT byunsangjun amultiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT parkwon amultiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT chokwanho amultiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT chojaeho amultiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT changahram amultiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT kangkimun amultiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT kimjinho amultiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT kimjinhee amultiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT byunsangjun multiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT parkwon multiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT chokwanho multiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT chojaeho multiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT changahram multiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT kangkimun multiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT kimjinho multiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416
AT kimjinhee multiinstitutionalstudyofbladderpreservingtherapyforstageiiivbladdercancerakoreanradiationoncologygroupstudykrog1416