Cargando…

Obesity Does not Compromise Ovarian Reserve Markers in Infertile Women

Introduction In the literature, conflicting results from studies examining the relationship between obesity and ovarian reserve have been reported. The purpose of the study is to investigate whether obesity adversely affects serum concentrations of ovarian reserve markers in infertile women with dif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorkem, Umit, Kucukler, Ferit Kerim, Togrul, Cihan, Gulen, Şebnem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0650-4723
_version_ 1783388059439464448
author Gorkem, Umit
Kucukler, Ferit Kerim
Togrul, Cihan
Gulen, Şebnem
author_facet Gorkem, Umit
Kucukler, Ferit Kerim
Togrul, Cihan
Gulen, Şebnem
author_sort Gorkem, Umit
collection PubMed
description Introduction In the literature, conflicting results from studies examining the relationship between obesity and ovarian reserve have been reported. The purpose of the study is to investigate whether obesity adversely affects serum concentrations of ovarian reserve markers in infertile women with different ovarian reserve status. Materials and Methods A total of 402 women were assigned to three groups according to body mass index (BMI; < 25 kg/m (2) : normal, n = 198; 25.0 – 29.9 kg/m (2) : overweight, n = 126; and ≥ 30 kg/m (2) : obese, n = 78). The women were also divided into two groups according to waist circumference (WC; < 80 cm: normal, n = 103; and ≥ 80 cm: obese, n = 299). Participants were also categorized into three types of ovarian reserve patterns: normal (n = 146), high (n = 112), and poor ovarian reserve (n = 144). The serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), estradiol (E2), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were assayed and compared in all groups. Results There were no significant differences in BMI and WC in the three ovarian reserve groups. There were significant differences between all ovarian reserve groups for AMH, E2, and FSH (p < 0.001 for all). The comparisons of ovarian reserve parameters (AMH, E2, and FSH) and obesity parameters (BMI and WC) revealed no significant differences in women with all ovarian reserve patterns. Conclusion The parameters of ovarian reserve do not seem to be affected by increased BMI and WC. Thus, AMH may be considered as a reliable marker of ovarian reserve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6336460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63364602019-01-24 Obesity Does not Compromise Ovarian Reserve Markers in Infertile Women Gorkem, Umit Kucukler, Ferit Kerim Togrul, Cihan Gulen, Şebnem Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Introduction In the literature, conflicting results from studies examining the relationship between obesity and ovarian reserve have been reported. The purpose of the study is to investigate whether obesity adversely affects serum concentrations of ovarian reserve markers in infertile women with different ovarian reserve status. Materials and Methods A total of 402 women were assigned to three groups according to body mass index (BMI; < 25 kg/m (2) : normal, n = 198; 25.0 – 29.9 kg/m (2) : overweight, n = 126; and ≥ 30 kg/m (2) : obese, n = 78). The women were also divided into two groups according to waist circumference (WC; < 80 cm: normal, n = 103; and ≥ 80 cm: obese, n = 299). Participants were also categorized into three types of ovarian reserve patterns: normal (n = 146), high (n = 112), and poor ovarian reserve (n = 144). The serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), estradiol (E2), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were assayed and compared in all groups. Results There were no significant differences in BMI and WC in the three ovarian reserve groups. There were significant differences between all ovarian reserve groups for AMH, E2, and FSH (p < 0.001 for all). The comparisons of ovarian reserve parameters (AMH, E2, and FSH) and obesity parameters (BMI and WC) revealed no significant differences in women with all ovarian reserve patterns. Conclusion The parameters of ovarian reserve do not seem to be affected by increased BMI and WC. Thus, AMH may be considered as a reliable marker of ovarian reserve. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-01 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6336460/ /pubmed/30686837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0650-4723 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Gorkem, Umit
Kucukler, Ferit Kerim
Togrul, Cihan
Gulen, Şebnem
Obesity Does not Compromise Ovarian Reserve Markers in Infertile Women
title Obesity Does not Compromise Ovarian Reserve Markers in Infertile Women
title_full Obesity Does not Compromise Ovarian Reserve Markers in Infertile Women
title_fullStr Obesity Does not Compromise Ovarian Reserve Markers in Infertile Women
title_full_unstemmed Obesity Does not Compromise Ovarian Reserve Markers in Infertile Women
title_short Obesity Does not Compromise Ovarian Reserve Markers in Infertile Women
title_sort obesity does not compromise ovarian reserve markers in infertile women
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30686837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0650-4723
work_keys_str_mv AT gorkemumit obesitydoesnotcompromiseovarianreservemarkersininfertilewomen
AT kucuklerferitkerim obesitydoesnotcompromiseovarianreservemarkersininfertilewomen
AT togrulcihan obesitydoesnotcompromiseovarianreservemarkersininfertilewomen
AT gulensebnem obesitydoesnotcompromiseovarianreservemarkersininfertilewomen