Cargando…
Spontaneous Breathing in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Insights From the Large Observational Study to UNderstand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory FailurE Study*
OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome with or without spontaneous breathing and to investigate whether the effects of spontaneous breathing on outcome depend on acute respiratory distress syndrome severity. DESIGN: Planned secon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30379668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003519 |
_version_ | 1783388063214338048 |
---|---|
author | van Haren, Frank Pham, Tài Brochard, Laurent Bellani, Giacomo Laffey, John Dres, Martin Fan, Eddy Goligher, Ewan C. Heunks, Leo Lynch, Joan Wrigge, Hermann McAuley, Danny |
author_facet | van Haren, Frank Pham, Tài Brochard, Laurent Bellani, Giacomo Laffey, John Dres, Martin Fan, Eddy Goligher, Ewan C. Heunks, Leo Lynch, Joan Wrigge, Hermann McAuley, Danny |
author_sort | van Haren, Frank |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome with or without spontaneous breathing and to investigate whether the effects of spontaneous breathing on outcome depend on acute respiratory distress syndrome severity. DESIGN: Planned secondary analysis of a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study. SETTING: International sample of 459 ICUs from 50 countries. PATIENTS: Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and at least 2 days of invasive mechanical ventilation and available data for the mode of mechanical ventilation and respiratory rate for the 2 first days. INTERVENTIONS: Analysis of patients with and without spontaneous breathing, defined by the mode of mechanical ventilation and by actual respiratory rate compared with set respiratory rate during the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Spontaneous breathing was present in 67% of patients with mild acute respiratory distress syndrome, 58% of patients with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 46% of patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients with spontaneous breathing were older and had lower acute respiratory distress syndrome severity, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores, ICU and hospital mortality, and were less likely to be diagnosed with acute respiratory distress syndrome by clinicians. In adjusted analysis, spontaneous breathing during the first 2 days was not associated with an effect on ICU or hospital mortality (33% vs 37%; odds ratio, 1.18 [0.92–1.51]; p = 0.19 and 37% vs 41%; odds ratio, 1.18 [0.93–1.50]; p = 0.196, respectively ). Spontaneous breathing was associated with increased ventilator-free days (13 [0–22] vs 8 [0–20]; p = 0.014) and shorter duration of ICU stay (11 [6–20] vs 12 [7–22]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous breathing is common in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome during the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. Spontaneous breathing is not associated with worse outcomes and may hasten liberation from the ventilator and from ICU. Although these results support the use of spontaneous breathing in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome independent of acute respiratory distress syndrome severity, the use of controlled ventilation indicates a bias toward use in patients with higher disease severity. In addition, because the lack of reliable data on inspiratory effort in our study, prospective studies incorporating the magnitude of inspiratory effort and adjusting for all potential severity confounders are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6336491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63364912019-01-29 Spontaneous Breathing in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Insights From the Large Observational Study to UNderstand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory FailurE Study* van Haren, Frank Pham, Tài Brochard, Laurent Bellani, Giacomo Laffey, John Dres, Martin Fan, Eddy Goligher, Ewan C. Heunks, Leo Lynch, Joan Wrigge, Hermann McAuley, Danny Crit Care Med Clinical Investigations OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome with or without spontaneous breathing and to investigate whether the effects of spontaneous breathing on outcome depend on acute respiratory distress syndrome severity. DESIGN: Planned secondary analysis of a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study. SETTING: International sample of 459 ICUs from 50 countries. PATIENTS: Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and at least 2 days of invasive mechanical ventilation and available data for the mode of mechanical ventilation and respiratory rate for the 2 first days. INTERVENTIONS: Analysis of patients with and without spontaneous breathing, defined by the mode of mechanical ventilation and by actual respiratory rate compared with set respiratory rate during the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Spontaneous breathing was present in 67% of patients with mild acute respiratory distress syndrome, 58% of patients with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 46% of patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients with spontaneous breathing were older and had lower acute respiratory distress syndrome severity, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores, ICU and hospital mortality, and were less likely to be diagnosed with acute respiratory distress syndrome by clinicians. In adjusted analysis, spontaneous breathing during the first 2 days was not associated with an effect on ICU or hospital mortality (33% vs 37%; odds ratio, 1.18 [0.92–1.51]; p = 0.19 and 37% vs 41%; odds ratio, 1.18 [0.93–1.50]; p = 0.196, respectively ). Spontaneous breathing was associated with increased ventilator-free days (13 [0–22] vs 8 [0–20]; p = 0.014) and shorter duration of ICU stay (11 [6–20] vs 12 [7–22]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous breathing is common in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome during the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. Spontaneous breathing is not associated with worse outcomes and may hasten liberation from the ventilator and from ICU. Although these results support the use of spontaneous breathing in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome independent of acute respiratory distress syndrome severity, the use of controlled ventilation indicates a bias toward use in patients with higher disease severity. In addition, because the lack of reliable data on inspiratory effort in our study, prospective studies incorporating the magnitude of inspiratory effort and adjusting for all potential severity confounders are required. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-02 2019-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6336491/ /pubmed/30379668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003519 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations van Haren, Frank Pham, Tài Brochard, Laurent Bellani, Giacomo Laffey, John Dres, Martin Fan, Eddy Goligher, Ewan C. Heunks, Leo Lynch, Joan Wrigge, Hermann McAuley, Danny Spontaneous Breathing in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Insights From the Large Observational Study to UNderstand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory FailurE Study* |
title | Spontaneous Breathing in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Insights From the Large Observational Study to UNderstand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory FailurE Study* |
title_full | Spontaneous Breathing in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Insights From the Large Observational Study to UNderstand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory FailurE Study* |
title_fullStr | Spontaneous Breathing in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Insights From the Large Observational Study to UNderstand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory FailurE Study* |
title_full_unstemmed | Spontaneous Breathing in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Insights From the Large Observational Study to UNderstand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory FailurE Study* |
title_short | Spontaneous Breathing in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Insights From the Large Observational Study to UNderstand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory FailurE Study* |
title_sort | spontaneous breathing in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: insights from the large observational study to understand the global impact of severe acute respiratory failure study* |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30379668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanharenfrank spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT phamtai spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT brochardlaurent spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT bellanigiacomo spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT laffeyjohn spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT dresmartin spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT faneddy spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT goligherewanc spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT heunksleo spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT lynchjoan spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT wriggehermann spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT mcauleydanny spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy AT spontaneousbreathinginearlyacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinsightsfromthelargeobservationalstudytounderstandtheglobalimpactofsevereacuterespiratoryfailurestudy |