Cargando…

A review of the 10/66 dementia research group

BACKGROUND: In this review we discuss how the study of dementia epidemiology in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) has changed in the last 20 years, and specifically to review the evidence created by the 10/66 Dementia Research Group (DRG) and discuss future directions for research. METHODS: W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prina, A. Matthew, Mayston, Rosie, Wu, Yu-Tzu, Prince, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1626-7
_version_ 1783388107461099520
author Prina, A. Matthew
Mayston, Rosie
Wu, Yu-Tzu
Prince, Martin
author_facet Prina, A. Matthew
Mayston, Rosie
Wu, Yu-Tzu
Prince, Martin
author_sort Prina, A. Matthew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this review we discuss how the study of dementia epidemiology in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) has changed in the last 20 years, and specifically to review the evidence created by the 10/66 Dementia Research Group (DRG) and discuss future directions for research. METHODS: We identified and collated all the papers related to the 10/66 Dementia Research Group, including papers from groups who adopted the 10/66 methodology, that have been published in peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: Over 200 papers including data from Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean were identified by this review. Many of the findings revolved around the epidemiology of dementia, mental health and non-communicable diseases, including the cross-cultural development and validation of measurement tools of cognition and functioning, need for care, care arrangements and mental health. Social ageing, care dependence and caregiver interventions were also topics that the group had published on. DISCUSSION: A body of evidence has been generated that has challenged the view, prevalent when the group started, that dementia is comparatively rare in LMICs. The experience of the 10/66 DRG has shown that descriptive epidemiological research can be important and impactful, where few data exist. Monitoring population trends in the prevalence and incidence of dementia may be our best chance to confirm hypotheses regarding modifiable risk factors of dementia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6336743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63367432019-02-01 A review of the 10/66 dementia research group Prina, A. Matthew Mayston, Rosie Wu, Yu-Tzu Prince, Martin Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Invited Review BACKGROUND: In this review we discuss how the study of dementia epidemiology in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) has changed in the last 20 years, and specifically to review the evidence created by the 10/66 Dementia Research Group (DRG) and discuss future directions for research. METHODS: We identified and collated all the papers related to the 10/66 Dementia Research Group, including papers from groups who adopted the 10/66 methodology, that have been published in peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: Over 200 papers including data from Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean were identified by this review. Many of the findings revolved around the epidemiology of dementia, mental health and non-communicable diseases, including the cross-cultural development and validation of measurement tools of cognition and functioning, need for care, care arrangements and mental health. Social ageing, care dependence and caregiver interventions were also topics that the group had published on. DISCUSSION: A body of evidence has been generated that has challenged the view, prevalent when the group started, that dementia is comparatively rare in LMICs. The experience of the 10/66 DRG has shown that descriptive epidemiological research can be important and impactful, where few data exist. Monitoring population trends in the prevalence and incidence of dementia may be our best chance to confirm hypotheses regarding modifiable risk factors of dementia. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6336743/ /pubmed/30467589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1626-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Prina, A. Matthew
Mayston, Rosie
Wu, Yu-Tzu
Prince, Martin
A review of the 10/66 dementia research group
title A review of the 10/66 dementia research group
title_full A review of the 10/66 dementia research group
title_fullStr A review of the 10/66 dementia research group
title_full_unstemmed A review of the 10/66 dementia research group
title_short A review of the 10/66 dementia research group
title_sort review of the 10/66 dementia research group
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1626-7
work_keys_str_mv AT prinaamatthew areviewofthe1066dementiaresearchgroup
AT maystonrosie areviewofthe1066dementiaresearchgroup
AT wuyutzu areviewofthe1066dementiaresearchgroup
AT princemartin areviewofthe1066dementiaresearchgroup
AT prinaamatthew reviewofthe1066dementiaresearchgroup
AT maystonrosie reviewofthe1066dementiaresearchgroup
AT wuyutzu reviewofthe1066dementiaresearchgroup
AT princemartin reviewofthe1066dementiaresearchgroup