Cargando…
Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches
In this paper, comparative assessment of failure fatigue lives of thin laminated cementitious composites (LCCs) modeled by two modeling approaches—double-parameter Weibull distribution model and triple-parameter distribution model—was carried out. LCCs were fabricated of ordinary Portland cement (OP...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30602671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12010110 |
_version_ | 1783388192923189248 |
---|---|
author | Hanif, Asad Kim, Yongjae Park, Cheolwoo |
author_facet | Hanif, Asad Kim, Yongjae Park, Cheolwoo |
author_sort | Hanif, Asad |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper, comparative assessment of failure fatigue lives of thin laminated cementitious composites (LCCs) modeled by two modeling approaches—double-parameter Weibull distribution model and triple-parameter distribution model—was carried out. LCCs were fabricated of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), fly ash cenosphere (FAC), quartz sand, and reinforcing meshes and fibers. The failure fatigue life assessment at various probabilities by the two-parameter model was based on numerical calculations whereas the three-parameter model was applied by an open source program—ProFatigue(®). Respective parameters, shape and scale parameters in the two-parameter Weibull distribution model while shape, scale, and location parameters in three-parameter model were determined, and the corresponding probabilistic fatigue lives at various failure probabilities were calculated. It is concluded that the two-parameter model is more accurate in probabilistic fatigue life assessment of double-layer mesh-reinforced LCCs, whereas for single-layer reinforced LCCs, both models could be used at a fair confidence level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6337210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63372102019-01-22 Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches Hanif, Asad Kim, Yongjae Park, Cheolwoo Materials (Basel) Article In this paper, comparative assessment of failure fatigue lives of thin laminated cementitious composites (LCCs) modeled by two modeling approaches—double-parameter Weibull distribution model and triple-parameter distribution model—was carried out. LCCs were fabricated of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), fly ash cenosphere (FAC), quartz sand, and reinforcing meshes and fibers. The failure fatigue life assessment at various probabilities by the two-parameter model was based on numerical calculations whereas the three-parameter model was applied by an open source program—ProFatigue(®). Respective parameters, shape and scale parameters in the two-parameter Weibull distribution model while shape, scale, and location parameters in three-parameter model were determined, and the corresponding probabilistic fatigue lives at various failure probabilities were calculated. It is concluded that the two-parameter model is more accurate in probabilistic fatigue life assessment of double-layer mesh-reinforced LCCs, whereas for single-layer reinforced LCCs, both models could be used at a fair confidence level. MDPI 2018-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6337210/ /pubmed/30602671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12010110 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hanif, Asad Kim, Yongjae Park, Cheolwoo Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches |
title | Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches |
title_full | Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches |
title_fullStr | Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches |
title_short | Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches |
title_sort | numerical validation of two-parameter weibull model for assessing failure fatigue lives of laminated cementitious composites—comparative assessment of modeling approaches |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30602671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12010110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanifasad numericalvalidationoftwoparameterweibullmodelforassessingfailurefatiguelivesoflaminatedcementitiouscompositescomparativeassessmentofmodelingapproaches AT kimyongjae numericalvalidationoftwoparameterweibullmodelforassessingfailurefatiguelivesoflaminatedcementitiouscompositescomparativeassessmentofmodelingapproaches AT parkcheolwoo numericalvalidationoftwoparameterweibullmodelforassessingfailurefatiguelivesoflaminatedcementitiouscompositescomparativeassessmentofmodelingapproaches |