Cargando…

Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches

In this paper, comparative assessment of failure fatigue lives of thin laminated cementitious composites (LCCs) modeled by two modeling approaches—double-parameter Weibull distribution model and triple-parameter distribution model—was carried out. LCCs were fabricated of ordinary Portland cement (OP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanif, Asad, Kim, Yongjae, Park, Cheolwoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30602671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12010110
_version_ 1783388192923189248
author Hanif, Asad
Kim, Yongjae
Park, Cheolwoo
author_facet Hanif, Asad
Kim, Yongjae
Park, Cheolwoo
author_sort Hanif, Asad
collection PubMed
description In this paper, comparative assessment of failure fatigue lives of thin laminated cementitious composites (LCCs) modeled by two modeling approaches—double-parameter Weibull distribution model and triple-parameter distribution model—was carried out. LCCs were fabricated of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), fly ash cenosphere (FAC), quartz sand, and reinforcing meshes and fibers. The failure fatigue life assessment at various probabilities by the two-parameter model was based on numerical calculations whereas the three-parameter model was applied by an open source program—ProFatigue(®). Respective parameters, shape and scale parameters in the two-parameter Weibull distribution model while shape, scale, and location parameters in three-parameter model were determined, and the corresponding probabilistic fatigue lives at various failure probabilities were calculated. It is concluded that the two-parameter model is more accurate in probabilistic fatigue life assessment of double-layer mesh-reinforced LCCs, whereas for single-layer reinforced LCCs, both models could be used at a fair confidence level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6337210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63372102019-01-22 Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches Hanif, Asad Kim, Yongjae Park, Cheolwoo Materials (Basel) Article In this paper, comparative assessment of failure fatigue lives of thin laminated cementitious composites (LCCs) modeled by two modeling approaches—double-parameter Weibull distribution model and triple-parameter distribution model—was carried out. LCCs were fabricated of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), fly ash cenosphere (FAC), quartz sand, and reinforcing meshes and fibers. The failure fatigue life assessment at various probabilities by the two-parameter model was based on numerical calculations whereas the three-parameter model was applied by an open source program—ProFatigue(®). Respective parameters, shape and scale parameters in the two-parameter Weibull distribution model while shape, scale, and location parameters in three-parameter model were determined, and the corresponding probabilistic fatigue lives at various failure probabilities were calculated. It is concluded that the two-parameter model is more accurate in probabilistic fatigue life assessment of double-layer mesh-reinforced LCCs, whereas for single-layer reinforced LCCs, both models could be used at a fair confidence level. MDPI 2018-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6337210/ /pubmed/30602671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12010110 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hanif, Asad
Kim, Yongjae
Park, Cheolwoo
Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches
title Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches
title_full Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches
title_fullStr Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches
title_short Numerical Validation of Two-Parameter Weibull Model for Assessing Failure Fatigue Lives of Laminated Cementitious Composites—Comparative Assessment of Modeling Approaches
title_sort numerical validation of two-parameter weibull model for assessing failure fatigue lives of laminated cementitious composites—comparative assessment of modeling approaches
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30602671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12010110
work_keys_str_mv AT hanifasad numericalvalidationoftwoparameterweibullmodelforassessingfailurefatiguelivesoflaminatedcementitiouscompositescomparativeassessmentofmodelingapproaches
AT kimyongjae numericalvalidationoftwoparameterweibullmodelforassessingfailurefatiguelivesoflaminatedcementitiouscompositescomparativeassessmentofmodelingapproaches
AT parkcheolwoo numericalvalidationoftwoparameterweibullmodelforassessingfailurefatiguelivesoflaminatedcementitiouscompositescomparativeassessmentofmodelingapproaches