Cargando…

Validity of the scan of postgraduate educational environment domains (SPEED) questionnaire in a rural general practice training setting

BACKGROUND: The educational environment is critical to learning and is determined by social interactions. Trainee satisfaction translates to career commitment, retention and a positive professional attitude as well as being an important factor in assessing the impact of the training program. This st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S., Alele, Faith, Collares, Carlos Fernando, Reeve, Carole, Van der Vleuten, Cees, Holdsworth, Marcy, Heggarty, Paula, Teague, Peta-Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1455-8
_version_ 1783388323623993344
author Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S.
Alele, Faith
Collares, Carlos Fernando
Reeve, Carole
Van der Vleuten, Cees
Holdsworth, Marcy
Heggarty, Paula
Teague, Peta-Ann
author_facet Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S.
Alele, Faith
Collares, Carlos Fernando
Reeve, Carole
Van der Vleuten, Cees
Holdsworth, Marcy
Heggarty, Paula
Teague, Peta-Ann
author_sort Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The educational environment is critical to learning and is determined by social interactions. Trainee satisfaction translates to career commitment, retention and a positive professional attitude as well as being an important factor in assessing the impact of the training program. This study aimed to validate the Scan of Postgraduate Educational Environment Domain (SPEED) tool and assess its appropriateness in evaluating the quality of General Practice (GP) rural postgraduate educational environment. METHODS: A questionnaire containing the 15-item SPEED tool was administered to GP registrars to examine their perceptions of the educational environment. Principal component analysis (PCA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were used to gather evidences of the validity of the instrument based on its internal structure. Additional validity evidence and reliability estimates were obtained using many-facet Rasch model analysis (MFRM). RESULTS: The survey was completed by 351 registrars with a response rate of 60%. Parallel analysis performed using principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis suggests that the SPEED tool is unidimensional. The MFRM analysis demonstrated an excellent degree of infit and outfit for items and training sites, but not for persons. The MFRM analysis also estimated high reliability levels for items (0.98), training sites (0.95) and persons within training sites (ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 in each training sites). Overall, the registrars agreed that the educational environment had high quality, with most (13 out of 15) of the items rated above 4 out of 5. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a high degree of validity and reliability of the SPEED tool for the measurement of the quality of the educational environment in a rural postgraduate GP training context. However, when applied in a new setting, the tool may not function as a multidimensional tool consistent with its theoretical grounding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6337755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63377552019-01-23 Validity of the scan of postgraduate educational environment domains (SPEED) questionnaire in a rural general practice training setting Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S. Alele, Faith Collares, Carlos Fernando Reeve, Carole Van der Vleuten, Cees Holdsworth, Marcy Heggarty, Paula Teague, Peta-Ann BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The educational environment is critical to learning and is determined by social interactions. Trainee satisfaction translates to career commitment, retention and a positive professional attitude as well as being an important factor in assessing the impact of the training program. This study aimed to validate the Scan of Postgraduate Educational Environment Domain (SPEED) tool and assess its appropriateness in evaluating the quality of General Practice (GP) rural postgraduate educational environment. METHODS: A questionnaire containing the 15-item SPEED tool was administered to GP registrars to examine their perceptions of the educational environment. Principal component analysis (PCA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were used to gather evidences of the validity of the instrument based on its internal structure. Additional validity evidence and reliability estimates were obtained using many-facet Rasch model analysis (MFRM). RESULTS: The survey was completed by 351 registrars with a response rate of 60%. Parallel analysis performed using principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis suggests that the SPEED tool is unidimensional. The MFRM analysis demonstrated an excellent degree of infit and outfit for items and training sites, but not for persons. The MFRM analysis also estimated high reliability levels for items (0.98), training sites (0.95) and persons within training sites (ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 in each training sites). Overall, the registrars agreed that the educational environment had high quality, with most (13 out of 15) of the items rated above 4 out of 5. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a high degree of validity and reliability of the SPEED tool for the measurement of the quality of the educational environment in a rural postgraduate GP training context. However, when applied in a new setting, the tool may not function as a multidimensional tool consistent with its theoretical grounding. BioMed Central 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6337755/ /pubmed/30654772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1455-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S.
Alele, Faith
Collares, Carlos Fernando
Reeve, Carole
Van der Vleuten, Cees
Holdsworth, Marcy
Heggarty, Paula
Teague, Peta-Ann
Validity of the scan of postgraduate educational environment domains (SPEED) questionnaire in a rural general practice training setting
title Validity of the scan of postgraduate educational environment domains (SPEED) questionnaire in a rural general practice training setting
title_full Validity of the scan of postgraduate educational environment domains (SPEED) questionnaire in a rural general practice training setting
title_fullStr Validity of the scan of postgraduate educational environment domains (SPEED) questionnaire in a rural general practice training setting
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the scan of postgraduate educational environment domains (SPEED) questionnaire in a rural general practice training setting
title_short Validity of the scan of postgraduate educational environment domains (SPEED) questionnaire in a rural general practice training setting
title_sort validity of the scan of postgraduate educational environment domains (speed) questionnaire in a rural general practice training setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1455-8
work_keys_str_mv AT malauadulibunmis validityofthescanofpostgraduateeducationalenvironmentdomainsspeedquestionnaireinaruralgeneralpracticetrainingsetting
AT alelefaith validityofthescanofpostgraduateeducationalenvironmentdomainsspeedquestionnaireinaruralgeneralpracticetrainingsetting
AT collarescarlosfernando validityofthescanofpostgraduateeducationalenvironmentdomainsspeedquestionnaireinaruralgeneralpracticetrainingsetting
AT reevecarole validityofthescanofpostgraduateeducationalenvironmentdomainsspeedquestionnaireinaruralgeneralpracticetrainingsetting
AT vandervleutencees validityofthescanofpostgraduateeducationalenvironmentdomainsspeedquestionnaireinaruralgeneralpracticetrainingsetting
AT holdsworthmarcy validityofthescanofpostgraduateeducationalenvironmentdomainsspeedquestionnaireinaruralgeneralpracticetrainingsetting
AT heggartypaula validityofthescanofpostgraduateeducationalenvironmentdomainsspeedquestionnaireinaruralgeneralpracticetrainingsetting
AT teaguepetaann validityofthescanofpostgraduateeducationalenvironmentdomainsspeedquestionnaireinaruralgeneralpracticetrainingsetting