Cargando…

Efficacy of tuina in patients with chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a common and disabling musculoskeletal disorder in developing and developed countries. Previous studies have shown that tuina and traditional Chinese massage are effective treatments for patients with CNP. However, there is little evidence to support the use of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Zhiwei, Kong, Lingjun, Zhu, Qingguang, Song, Pengfei, Fang, Min, Sun, Wuquan, Zhang, Hao, Cheng, Yanbin, Xu, Shanda, Guo, Guangxin, Zhou, Xin, Lv, Zhizhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3096-3
_version_ 1783388326871433216
author Wu, Zhiwei
Kong, Lingjun
Zhu, Qingguang
Song, Pengfei
Fang, Min
Sun, Wuquan
Zhang, Hao
Cheng, Yanbin
Xu, Shanda
Guo, Guangxin
Zhou, Xin
Lv, Zhizhen
author_facet Wu, Zhiwei
Kong, Lingjun
Zhu, Qingguang
Song, Pengfei
Fang, Min
Sun, Wuquan
Zhang, Hao
Cheng, Yanbin
Xu, Shanda
Guo, Guangxin
Zhou, Xin
Lv, Zhizhen
author_sort Wu, Zhiwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a common and disabling musculoskeletal disorder in developing and developed countries. Previous studies have shown that tuina and traditional Chinese massage are effective treatments for patients with CNP. However, there is little evidence to support the use of one intervention over the other. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of tuina and traditional Chinese massage in the treatment of pain and disability in patients with CNP. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter, assessor- and analyst-blinded, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms: a tuina group and a traditional Chinese massage group. A total of 356 eligible CNP patients will be randomly assigned to the groups in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention in the tuina group includes both structural and relaxation massage, while the traditional Chinese massage group will receive relaxation massage only. The interventions for both groups will last for 15 min and will be carried out three times a week for a period of 4 weeks. The primary outcome will be changes in the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes will be measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The data will be analyzed at the baseline, at the end of the intervention, and during the 3 months of follow-up by repeated measures analysis of variance. The significance level is 5%. The safety of tuina and traditional Chinese massage will be evaluated after each treatment session. The results of this trial will help clarify the value of tuina and traditional Chinese massage as treatments for CNP and will highlight any differences in the efficacy of the treatments. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this trial is to determine whether tuina is more effective than traditional Chinese massage in adults with CNP. This trial will, therefore, contribute to providing a solid foundation for clinical treatment of CNP, as well as future research in massage therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-INR-17013763. Registered 8 December 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3096-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6337769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63377692019-01-23 Efficacy of tuina in patients with chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Wu, Zhiwei Kong, Lingjun Zhu, Qingguang Song, Pengfei Fang, Min Sun, Wuquan Zhang, Hao Cheng, Yanbin Xu, Shanda Guo, Guangxin Zhou, Xin Lv, Zhizhen Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a common and disabling musculoskeletal disorder in developing and developed countries. Previous studies have shown that tuina and traditional Chinese massage are effective treatments for patients with CNP. However, there is little evidence to support the use of one intervention over the other. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of tuina and traditional Chinese massage in the treatment of pain and disability in patients with CNP. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter, assessor- and analyst-blinded, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms: a tuina group and a traditional Chinese massage group. A total of 356 eligible CNP patients will be randomly assigned to the groups in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention in the tuina group includes both structural and relaxation massage, while the traditional Chinese massage group will receive relaxation massage only. The interventions for both groups will last for 15 min and will be carried out three times a week for a period of 4 weeks. The primary outcome will be changes in the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes will be measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The data will be analyzed at the baseline, at the end of the intervention, and during the 3 months of follow-up by repeated measures analysis of variance. The significance level is 5%. The safety of tuina and traditional Chinese massage will be evaluated after each treatment session. The results of this trial will help clarify the value of tuina and traditional Chinese massage as treatments for CNP and will highlight any differences in the efficacy of the treatments. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this trial is to determine whether tuina is more effective than traditional Chinese massage in adults with CNP. This trial will, therefore, contribute to providing a solid foundation for clinical treatment of CNP, as well as future research in massage therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-INR-17013763. Registered 8 December 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3096-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6337769/ /pubmed/30654844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3096-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Wu, Zhiwei
Kong, Lingjun
Zhu, Qingguang
Song, Pengfei
Fang, Min
Sun, Wuquan
Zhang, Hao
Cheng, Yanbin
Xu, Shanda
Guo, Guangxin
Zhou, Xin
Lv, Zhizhen
Efficacy of tuina in patients with chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of tuina in patients with chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of tuina in patients with chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of tuina in patients with chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of tuina in patients with chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of tuina in patients with chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of tuina in patients with chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3096-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wuzhiwei efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT konglingjun efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhuqingguang efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT songpengfei efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fangmin efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sunwuquan efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhanghao efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chengyanbin efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xushanda efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guoguangxin efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhouxin efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lvzhizhen efficacyoftuinainpatientswithchronicneckpainstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial