Cargando…
Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial
BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a life-saving technology that restores or assists breathing. Like any treatment, MV has side effects. In some patients it can cause diaphragmatic atrophy, injury, and dysfunction (ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, VIDD). Accumulating evidence su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3171-9 |
_version_ | 1783388327356923904 |
---|---|
author | Evans, Douglas Shure, Deborah Clark, Linda Criner, Gerard J. Dres, Martin de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Laghi, Franco McDonagh, David Petrof, Basil Nelson, Teresa Similowski, Thomas |
author_facet | Evans, Douglas Shure, Deborah Clark, Linda Criner, Gerard J. Dres, Martin de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Laghi, Franco McDonagh, David Petrof, Basil Nelson, Teresa Similowski, Thomas |
author_sort | Evans, Douglas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a life-saving technology that restores or assists breathing. Like any treatment, MV has side effects. In some patients it can cause diaphragmatic atrophy, injury, and dysfunction (ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, VIDD). Accumulating evidence suggests that VIDD makes weaning from MV difficult, which involves increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This paper describes the protocol of a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial that is designed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a novel therapy, temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing (TTVDP), to improve weaning from MV in up to 88 mechanically ventilated adult patients who have failed at least two spontaneous breathing trials over at least 7 days. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to TTVDP (treatment) or standard of care (control) groups. The primary efficacy endpoint is time to successful extubation with no reintubation within 48 h. Secondary endpoints include maximal inspiratory pressure and ultrasound-measured changes in diaphragm thickness and diaphragm thickening fraction over time. In addition, observational data will be collected and analyzed, including 30-day mortality and time to discharge from the intensive care unit and from the hospital. The hypothesis to be tested postulates that more TTVDP patients than control patients will be successfully weaned from MV within the 30 days following randomization. DISCUSSION: This study is the first large-scale clinical trial of a novel technology (TTVDP) aimed at accelerating difficult weaning from MV. The technology tested provides the first therapy directed specifically at VIDD, an important cause of delayed weaning from MV. Its results will help delineate the place of this therapeutic approach in clinical practice and help design future studies aimed at defining the indications and benefits of TTVDP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03096639. Registered on 30 March 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3171-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6337771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63377712019-01-23 Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial Evans, Douglas Shure, Deborah Clark, Linda Criner, Gerard J. Dres, Martin de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Laghi, Franco McDonagh, David Petrof, Basil Nelson, Teresa Similowski, Thomas Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a life-saving technology that restores or assists breathing. Like any treatment, MV has side effects. In some patients it can cause diaphragmatic atrophy, injury, and dysfunction (ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, VIDD). Accumulating evidence suggests that VIDD makes weaning from MV difficult, which involves increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This paper describes the protocol of a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial that is designed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a novel therapy, temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing (TTVDP), to improve weaning from MV in up to 88 mechanically ventilated adult patients who have failed at least two spontaneous breathing trials over at least 7 days. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to TTVDP (treatment) or standard of care (control) groups. The primary efficacy endpoint is time to successful extubation with no reintubation within 48 h. Secondary endpoints include maximal inspiratory pressure and ultrasound-measured changes in diaphragm thickness and diaphragm thickening fraction over time. In addition, observational data will be collected and analyzed, including 30-day mortality and time to discharge from the intensive care unit and from the hospital. The hypothesis to be tested postulates that more TTVDP patients than control patients will be successfully weaned from MV within the 30 days following randomization. DISCUSSION: This study is the first large-scale clinical trial of a novel technology (TTVDP) aimed at accelerating difficult weaning from MV. The technology tested provides the first therapy directed specifically at VIDD, an important cause of delayed weaning from MV. Its results will help delineate the place of this therapeutic approach in clinical practice and help design future studies aimed at defining the indications and benefits of TTVDP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03096639. Registered on 30 March 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3171-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6337771/ /pubmed/30654837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3171-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Evans, Douglas Shure, Deborah Clark, Linda Criner, Gerard J. Dres, Martin de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Laghi, Franco McDonagh, David Petrof, Basil Nelson, Teresa Similowski, Thomas Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial |
title | Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial |
title_full | Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial |
title_short | Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial |
title_sort | temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3171-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evansdouglas temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial AT shuredeborah temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial AT clarklinda temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial AT crinergerardj temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial AT dresmartin temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial AT deabreumarcelogama temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial AT laghifranco temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial AT mcdonaghdavid temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial AT petrofbasil temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial AT nelsonteresa temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial AT similowskithomas temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial |