Cargando…

Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a life-saving technology that restores or assists breathing. Like any treatment, MV has side effects. In some patients it can cause diaphragmatic atrophy, injury, and dysfunction (ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, VIDD). Accumulating evidence su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Douglas, Shure, Deborah, Clark, Linda, Criner, Gerard J., Dres, Martin, de Abreu, Marcelo Gama, Laghi, Franco, McDonagh, David, Petrof, Basil, Nelson, Teresa, Similowski, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3171-9
_version_ 1783388327356923904
author Evans, Douglas
Shure, Deborah
Clark, Linda
Criner, Gerard J.
Dres, Martin
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Laghi, Franco
McDonagh, David
Petrof, Basil
Nelson, Teresa
Similowski, Thomas
author_facet Evans, Douglas
Shure, Deborah
Clark, Linda
Criner, Gerard J.
Dres, Martin
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Laghi, Franco
McDonagh, David
Petrof, Basil
Nelson, Teresa
Similowski, Thomas
author_sort Evans, Douglas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a life-saving technology that restores or assists breathing. Like any treatment, MV has side effects. In some patients it can cause diaphragmatic atrophy, injury, and dysfunction (ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, VIDD). Accumulating evidence suggests that VIDD makes weaning from MV difficult, which involves increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This paper describes the protocol of a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial that is designed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a novel therapy, temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing (TTVDP), to improve weaning from MV in up to 88 mechanically ventilated adult patients who have failed at least two spontaneous breathing trials over at least 7 days. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to TTVDP (treatment) or standard of care (control) groups. The primary efficacy endpoint is time to successful extubation with no reintubation within 48 h. Secondary endpoints include maximal inspiratory pressure and ultrasound-measured changes in diaphragm thickness and diaphragm thickening fraction over time. In addition, observational data will be collected and analyzed, including 30-day mortality and time to discharge from the intensive care unit and from the hospital. The hypothesis to be tested postulates that more TTVDP patients than control patients will be successfully weaned from MV within the 30 days following randomization. DISCUSSION: This study is the first large-scale clinical trial of a novel technology (TTVDP) aimed at accelerating difficult weaning from MV. The technology tested provides the first therapy directed specifically at VIDD, an important cause of delayed weaning from MV. Its results will help delineate the place of this therapeutic approach in clinical practice and help design future studies aimed at defining the indications and benefits of TTVDP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03096639. Registered on 30 March 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3171-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6337771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63377712019-01-23 Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial Evans, Douglas Shure, Deborah Clark, Linda Criner, Gerard J. Dres, Martin de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Laghi, Franco McDonagh, David Petrof, Basil Nelson, Teresa Similowski, Thomas Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a life-saving technology that restores or assists breathing. Like any treatment, MV has side effects. In some patients it can cause diaphragmatic atrophy, injury, and dysfunction (ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, VIDD). Accumulating evidence suggests that VIDD makes weaning from MV difficult, which involves increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This paper describes the protocol of a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial that is designed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a novel therapy, temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing (TTVDP), to improve weaning from MV in up to 88 mechanically ventilated adult patients who have failed at least two spontaneous breathing trials over at least 7 days. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to TTVDP (treatment) or standard of care (control) groups. The primary efficacy endpoint is time to successful extubation with no reintubation within 48 h. Secondary endpoints include maximal inspiratory pressure and ultrasound-measured changes in diaphragm thickness and diaphragm thickening fraction over time. In addition, observational data will be collected and analyzed, including 30-day mortality and time to discharge from the intensive care unit and from the hospital. The hypothesis to be tested postulates that more TTVDP patients than control patients will be successfully weaned from MV within the 30 days following randomization. DISCUSSION: This study is the first large-scale clinical trial of a novel technology (TTVDP) aimed at accelerating difficult weaning from MV. The technology tested provides the first therapy directed specifically at VIDD, an important cause of delayed weaning from MV. Its results will help delineate the place of this therapeutic approach in clinical practice and help design future studies aimed at defining the indications and benefits of TTVDP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03096639. Registered on 30 March 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3171-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6337771/ /pubmed/30654837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3171-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Evans, Douglas
Shure, Deborah
Clark, Linda
Criner, Gerard J.
Dres, Martin
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Laghi, Franco
McDonagh, David
Petrof, Basil
Nelson, Teresa
Similowski, Thomas
Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial
title Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial
title_full Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial
title_fullStr Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial
title_short Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial
title_sort temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3171-9
work_keys_str_mv AT evansdouglas temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT shuredeborah temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT clarklinda temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT crinergerardj temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT dresmartin temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT deabreumarcelogama temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT laghifranco temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT mcdonaghdavid temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT petrofbasil temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT nelsonteresa temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial
AT similowskithomas temporarytransvenousdiaphragmpacingvsstandardofcareforweaningfrommechanicalventilationstudyprotocolforarandomizedtrial