Cargando…

Early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic integrative review of definitions and activities

BACKGROUND: Mechanically ventilated patients often develop muscle weakness post-intensive care admission. Current evidence suggests that early mobilisation of these patients can be an effective intervention in improving their outcomes. However, what constitutes early mobilisation in mechanically ven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clarissa, Catherine, Salisbury, Lisa, Rodgers, Sheila, Kean, Susanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0355-z
_version_ 1783388337089806336
author Clarissa, Catherine
Salisbury, Lisa
Rodgers, Sheila
Kean, Susanne
author_facet Clarissa, Catherine
Salisbury, Lisa
Rodgers, Sheila
Kean, Susanne
author_sort Clarissa, Catherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mechanically ventilated patients often develop muscle weakness post-intensive care admission. Current evidence suggests that early mobilisation of these patients can be an effective intervention in improving their outcomes. However, what constitutes early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients (EM-MV) remains unclear. We aimed to systematically explore the definitions and activity types of EM-MV in the literature. METHODS: Whittemore and Knafl’s framework guided this review. CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, and Cochrane Library were searched to capture studies from 2000 to 2018, combined with hand search of grey literature and reference lists of included studies. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools were used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Data extraction and quality assessment of studies were performed independently by each reviewer before coming together in sub-groups for discussion and agreement. An inductive and data-driven thematic analysis was undertaken on verbatim extracts of EM-MV definitions and activities in included studies. RESULTS: Seventy-six studies were included from which four major themes were inferred: (1) non-standardised definition, (2) contextual factors, (3) negotiated process and (4) collaboration between patients and staff. The first theme indicates that EM-MV is either not fully defined in studies or when a definition is provided this is not standardised across studies. The remaining themes reflect the diversity of EM-MV activities which depends on patients’ characteristics and ICU settings; the negotiated decision-making process between patients and staff; and their interdependent relationship during the implementation. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the absence of an agreed definition and on what constitutes early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients. To advance research and practice an agreed and shared definition is a pre-requisite.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6337811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63378112019-01-24 Early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic integrative review of definitions and activities Clarissa, Catherine Salisbury, Lisa Rodgers, Sheila Kean, Susanne J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Mechanically ventilated patients often develop muscle weakness post-intensive care admission. Current evidence suggests that early mobilisation of these patients can be an effective intervention in improving their outcomes. However, what constitutes early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients (EM-MV) remains unclear. We aimed to systematically explore the definitions and activity types of EM-MV in the literature. METHODS: Whittemore and Knafl’s framework guided this review. CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, and Cochrane Library were searched to capture studies from 2000 to 2018, combined with hand search of grey literature and reference lists of included studies. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools were used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Data extraction and quality assessment of studies were performed independently by each reviewer before coming together in sub-groups for discussion and agreement. An inductive and data-driven thematic analysis was undertaken on verbatim extracts of EM-MV definitions and activities in included studies. RESULTS: Seventy-six studies were included from which four major themes were inferred: (1) non-standardised definition, (2) contextual factors, (3) negotiated process and (4) collaboration between patients and staff. The first theme indicates that EM-MV is either not fully defined in studies or when a definition is provided this is not standardised across studies. The remaining themes reflect the diversity of EM-MV activities which depends on patients’ characteristics and ICU settings; the negotiated decision-making process between patients and staff; and their interdependent relationship during the implementation. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the absence of an agreed definition and on what constitutes early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients. To advance research and practice an agreed and shared definition is a pre-requisite. BioMed Central 2019-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6337811/ /pubmed/30680218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0355-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Clarissa, Catherine
Salisbury, Lisa
Rodgers, Sheila
Kean, Susanne
Early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic integrative review of definitions and activities
title Early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic integrative review of definitions and activities
title_full Early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic integrative review of definitions and activities
title_fullStr Early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic integrative review of definitions and activities
title_full_unstemmed Early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic integrative review of definitions and activities
title_short Early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic integrative review of definitions and activities
title_sort early mobilisation in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic integrative review of definitions and activities
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0355-z
work_keys_str_mv AT clarissacatherine earlymobilisationinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsasystematicintegrativereviewofdefinitionsandactivities
AT salisburylisa earlymobilisationinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsasystematicintegrativereviewofdefinitionsandactivities
AT rodgerssheila earlymobilisationinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsasystematicintegrativereviewofdefinitionsandactivities
AT keansusanne earlymobilisationinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsasystematicintegrativereviewofdefinitionsandactivities