Cargando…

Continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not

BACKGROUND: While continuous exercise (CE) induces greater ventilation ([Formula: see text] (E)) when compared to intermittent exercise (IE), little is known of the consequences on airway damage. Our aim was to investigate markers of epithelial cell damage – i.e. serum levels of CC16 and of the CC16...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Combes, Adrien, Dekerle, Jeanne, Dumont, Xavier, Twomey, Rosie, Bernard, Alfred, Daussin, Frédéric, Bougault, Valérie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30654798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-0978-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: While continuous exercise (CE) induces greater ventilation ([Formula: see text] (E)) when compared to intermittent exercise (IE), little is known of the consequences on airway damage. Our aim was to investigate markers of epithelial cell damage – i.e. serum levels of CC16 and of the CC16/SP-D ratio - during and following a bout of CE and IE of matched work. METHODS: Sixteen healthy young adults performed a 30-min continuous (CE) and a 60-min intermittent exercise (IE; 1-min work: 1-min rest) on separate occasions in a random order. Intensity was set at 70% of their maximum work rate (WR(max)). Heart rate (HR) and [Formula: see text] (E) were measured throughout both tests. Blood samples were taken at rest, after the 10th min of the warm-up, at the end of both exercises, half way through IE (matched time but 50% work done for IE) as well as 30- and 60-min post-exercise. Lactate and CC16 and SP-D were determined. RESULTS: Mean [Formula: see text] (E) was higher for CE compared to IE (85 ± 17 l.min(− 1) vs 50 ± 8 l.min(− 1), respectively; P < 0.001). Serum-based markers of epithelial cell damage remained unchanged during IE. Interaction of test × time was observed for SP-D (P = 0.02), CC16 (μg.l(− 1)) (P = 0.006) and CC16/SP-D ratio (P = 0.03). Maximum delta CC16/SP-D was significantly correlated with mean [Formula: see text] (E) sustained (r = 0.83, P < 0.001) during CE but not during IE. CONCLUSION: The 30-min CE performed at 70% WR(max) induced mild airway damage, while a time- or work-matched IE did not. The extent of the damage during CE was associated with the higher ventilation rate.